Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Main Debate Question; This is a Debate?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (40 fans)

Tonight’s “debate” sponsored by ABC gave Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos an opportunity to demonstrate that they and their broadcast network have more contempt for the public airways than does Rupert Murdoch. They proved it beyond the shadow of a doubt.

 

The proceedings opened with a rehash of Mario Cuomo’s fully reversible dream ticket, then devolved into forty-five minutes of a Weekly World News like forum for gossip. It was very much like a rerun of The Worst of Fox, with most of the opening salvoes aimed at undermining Obama. The first two questions dealt with Obama’s San Francisco comments and his former pastor, Jeremiah Wright, with asides from Hillary attempting to connect Obama with Louis Farrakhan and Hamas. The third question, directed to Senator Clinton, dealt with her Bosnia sniper remarks. Then back to Senator Obama with the Rush Limbaugh/Sean Hannity talking points about flag lapel pins and striving to link him with William Ayers of the Weather Underground. It was a sort of guilt by association and misinterpretation sweepstakes.

 

Finally, after forty-five minutes of tabloid sleaze, they stumbled upon a subject that could be construed as germane to the campaign. That was the Iraq war. Even that, however was presented by Gibson in a fashion to denigrate the positions of both candidates if they didn’t abandon their commitments to withdraw troops and not toe the line drawn by General Petreus’ propaganda.

 

The discussion of Iran and the possibility of their producing nuclear weapons was dominated by the panel’s attempts to elicit a commitment from the candidates to declare that an Iranian nuclear attack on Israel would be considered to be the same as an attack on the United States. Obama did not bite; Clinton did, saying that such an attack “would trigger massive retaliation”.

 

Discussion moved to tax policy next with Charlie and Georgie publishing the McCain claim that any Democrat would raise taxes on everyone without regard to income level. Then Charlie tried to elicit a “read my lips” pledge from the candidates to foreswear any tax increases of “any kind” on people earning less than $200,000.00 per year. In keeping with the ABC policy of disingenuous repartee, the transparent gotcha was sprung a few minutes later when he pointed out how the candidates had discussed raising the cap on earnings eligible for Social Security Taxes.

 

From there, the low quality of the moderating plateaued through questions regarding gun control, affirmative action and gas prices (as opposed to energy policy). Then they found the edge of the plateau and descended back to the gossip with a question about making use of former presidents (as if Dubya could be used for anything more than hard physical labor).

 

The final question, striving to keep itself as devoid of substance as the previous hour and three quarters, dealt with how they would argue their merits to the Democratic super delegates to secure the nomination. And that, dear friends, is how ABC wastes two hours of airtime.

 

I have to conclude at the end of this propaganda fest that ABC News aspires to be worse than Fox News, and this night has brought them a long, long way toward achieving that goal. It nice to know where the fascists stand, and now that the ABC fascists have told me, I’ll believe them.

 

I am a lifelong resident of the Chicago suburbs, with a several year hiatus to serve in the Navy when my Vietnam era draft notice turned up. I had been told that guys with last names like mine were among the preferred cannon fodder in the Army, so (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Steal $2.5 Trillion

The "Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme" Hoax

Wisconsin's Union Workers Have Always Paid 100% of the Cost of Their Benefits

Republican Bipartisanship, a Union of Both of Their Faces

Considering Edward Snowden

The Democratization of Energy, or God Bless the Child That's Got His Own

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

With your description of the appetizer, I can see ... by Margaret Bassett on Thursday, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:07:09 AM
Thanks for the compliment. I have a great deal of ... by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:13:37 PM
things that turned my stomach.One was Stephanopoul... by Richard Mynick on Thursday, Apr 17, 2008 at 6:09:25 PM