Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
16 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

False Gods Create False Hope

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (14 fans)

opednews.com

The good news is the huge pent up public demand for political change.  The bad news is that presidential candidates have made a mockery of the concept of change while ignoring true political reforms.  Missing are details about fixing the corrupt, dysfunctional political system and restoring balance among the three branches of government and between the states and the federal government.

 

So what kind of change do people want?  The Wall Street Journal-NBC News survey last month of both Democrats and Republicans found 24 percent of voters favor “small adjustments” in America, 29 percent want “moderate corrections,” but 46 percent thankfully seek “major reforms” and a “brand-new” approach.

 

When people rally behind false change agents something worse than being disappointed and having their hopes killed happens: the national energy for real change is wasted.  In the end, false change agents protect the status quo political establishment.  Hope is replaced by despair for disaffected anti-establishment masses.  The worst false change agent is Ron Paul.

 

An early sign of trouble was that Paul supporters seemed to worship him as if he is the long-awaited savior for America, akin to one of our Founding Fathers.  In their writing and behavior they seem like members of a cult, not thoughtful political activists open to new information.  They don’t appreciate the need to have disagreements without being disagreeable.  Though their hero speaks of persuasion, his supporters express obnoxious in-your-face anger, disparagement, and intimidation.  They show disdain for others that want major political change but do not support Paul.

 

For years before he became a Republican presidential candidate I had admired Paul for his maverick behavior in Congress and had a very pleasant meeting with him.  But I had doubts about most of his policy goals, and his use of pork spending earmarks to get billions of dollars for his district was troubling.  Paul remains a change talker, not a change agent.

 

The more I examined what he wanted to do as president the more he looked like the emperor with no clothes.  He never produced detailed plans on how he would use new legislation, presidential actions or constitutional amendments.  This is especially important for his drastic changes, such as eliminating much of the federal government and putting the country’s currency back on the gold standard.  His supporters never seem to demand details.  Paul and his supporters exhibit therapeutic activism: activism that makes them feel good but lacks details necessary to convince others.

 

Yes, I have advocated a Second American Revolution and Paul’s supporters also want a revolution.  But a revolution requires leaders that can communicate so effectively with diverse Americans that massive public support results.  Paul and his supporters give freedom their highest priority, but do not welcome the exercise of freedom by Americans to reject their beliefs.  As Gary Wood, a Paul supporter correctly observed: “You will create more damage to our cause than good if you continue to spew hatred and poisonous venom rather than reason and kindness. Threats and nasty vile hatred will not spread our message; only detract from the importance of liberty and freedom.”

 

Paul, the professed champion of the Constitution, brings it up in virtually every public statement and claims to believe in a strict reading of it.  But he refuses to honor what is in Article V: the option the Founders gave us to have state delegates in a convention consider proposals for constitutional amendments.  The one and only numeric requirement in Article V has been more than satisfied, as explained at www.foavc.org.  Yet Paul has not demanded that members of Congress obey Article V and their oath of office to obey the Constitution.  This is no trivial matter.

 

You would think he would honor the purpose of the Article V convention option: a way to circumvent an ineffective federal government and restore balance between it and the states.  Paul should use his candidacy to make a public commitment to get the nation’s first Article V convention.  That would be revolutionary.

 

Nor has Paul not forcefully criticized the two-party stranglehold on the political system, despite once losing as a Libertarian Party presidential candidate pushing the same policy ideas.  Nor has he clamored for the impeachment of George W. Bush, whose foreign policies contradict Paul’s isolationist beliefs.  No reason for Paul to be concerned about Bush supporters, only 4 percent of Republicans support Paul.  And thankfully, citizens in Iowa, Wyoming, New Hampshire (a Libertarian stronghold), and now Michigan have not succumbed to Paul’s demonology. Despite having considerable money Paul has won no delegates.

 

Whether other candidates are true reformers remains doubtful.  Obama’s glib talk of more bipartisanship smacks of protecting the status quo political establishment.  Huckabee’s religiosity and Romney’s automaton personality are plain frightening, as are McCain’s and Giuliani’s bellicose beliefs.  Edwards looks like the real thing, but like Kucinich has been out spent by Obama and the ever phony Clinton whose change priority is moving back into the White House.

 

Like others, I want Mike Bloomberg to enter the race as an independent candidate, if only to mount a serious attack on the two-party stranglehold on our political system.

 

http://articlev.wix.com/statusquobuster

Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government. His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Americans Unready to Revolt, Despite Revolting Conditions

Entering a Hospital and On Medicare? The One Question You Must Always Ask

Tea Party Terrorists

9/11 Truth Manifesto

The Most Powerful People in America

Fight Economic Oppression, Target the Top One Percent

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The Constitution is clear that two thirds of state... by Rev. Robert Vinciguerra on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:19:39 AM
I do not believe that Mr. Hirschhorn is much of a ... by Mark Bennett on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:59:20 AM
 Even though many people believe that any of ... by Isaiah Truman on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:41:14 AM
If you can't damn it, you divert it.... by John Hanks on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008 at 2:15:38 PM
Joel, I'll give you one thing... you certainly are... by Dan Druck on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008 at 4:34:50 PM
Why Ron Paul is the only choice for me: Ameri... by Joe Allen on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008 at 5:32:34 PM
Do you even know what Dr. Paul's platform real... by Joe Allen on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008 at 6:54:50 PM
"In their writing and behavior they seem like... by Ingrid on Thursday, Jan 17, 2008 at 8:04:59 PM
re. Ingrid responding to article author "they... by Adnihilo on Friday, Jan 18, 2008 at 9:25:41 AM
I went here http://www.dehp.net/candidate/index.ph... by James Moore on Friday, Jan 18, 2008 at 6:50:32 PM
Learn some discernment.This is NOT the pot calling... by Ingrid on Saturday, Jan 19, 2008 at 8:54:36 AM
I went back and tried to find some articles in whi... by Ingrid on Saturday, Jan 19, 2008 at 9:32:43 AM
All of Ron Paul's supporters here sincerely ne... by Adnihilo on Sunday, Jan 20, 2008 at 1:58:36 PM
As part of your in-depth research of Ron Paul, ple... by Ingrid on Monday, Jan 21, 2008 at 9:31:50 AM
How many times is Mr. Hirschhorn going to repost t... by James Moore on Friday, Jan 18, 2008 at 6:44:02 PM
I'm going to be as nice as I can, this is NOT ... by James Moore on Saturday, Jan 19, 2008 at 6:46:04 PM