Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

"Free Speech" Winnows the List of Candidates

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
Winnow (noun) The act of separating grain from chaff.

If we are indeed winnowing, then America has been winnowed into three guys left standing on the Republican side and two Democrats. Something like 5 out of 24, depending on who you count. Whether they are wheat or chaff depends upon your point of view.

This, with less that 1% of the electorate having had a chance to put their mark on a ballot or finger on a screen. Free speech is not so free anymore.
The latest numbers (always a calendar quarter behind because of reporting regulations) stripped mainstream America of the voices of

  • Fred Thompson
  • Bill Richardson
  • Ron Paul
  • Dennis Kucinich
  • Mike Huckabee
  • Joe Biden

and are about to add John Edwards to the list.

How you feel about that depends upon how hot you are to see Hillary or Barack, Mitt, Rudy or John lead the country. Is it enough to have the choice by dollars raised rather than votes counted?

If it is, then why not just do a national copy of that thermometer the United Way used to tell us how we were doing on their fund-raising in town?

Forget the rhetoric.

The point I’m trying to make is that the Supreme Court, some decades back, irreparably muddied the distinction between ‘free speech’ and the ‘freedom to speak.’ We are constitutionally protected in our right to the freedom to speak. Stand up and voice your opinion. Write whatever the papers will print.

Blame the media if you care to. Along with an addiction to polls, it’s another American need to find blame, to have someone to pin the goods on and then get on with our lives. There’s no convenient evil upon which to blame the hijacking of speech in America.

But the Court made it law. Time after time after time, in a frenzy of dithering, our highest court stood meekly in defense of whoever had the bucks to demagogue the subject of their choice.

  • Attack ads to defeat gun control—just write the checks.
  • Anti-gay, anti-conservative, anti-liberal, anti-war, anti-Islam—all you need is enough money to swamp the opposition. Not with speech, with media.
  • Lawsuits to manhandle your way into this or that issue? You got the money, honey, I got the time.

I am certainly not so naïve as to think that money wasn't always a weapon for or against public opinion.

But it seems prudent to take a look at the longest-running, most arduent, mind-bogglingly unending presidential race (that has been going on for a year and a half already and has near a year left to run). Essentially, it's been settled for us in five days.

By the electorate? Not on your life. Iowa and New Hampshire. What a laugh.
As Jon Stewart quipped, it's been determined by “cold white people and colder white people.”

Issues will get hot though as this veritable tie among front-runners develops. But they’ll heat up without the voices of Fred, Bill and Ron; Dennis, Mike and Joe. There won’t be a “hey, wait a minute” voice. No designated hitter in this ball-game.

The front-runners will hedge, slice and dice their bets slicker than sub-prime mortgages. American politics has become a mad rush for the center of the ‘base,’ whatever the hell the base is and however the pollsters define it for us.

We've become another commodity. Shake us, bake us, tag our ear and ship us.

In two days we will have the results in Michigan and Hillary and Barack need not spend another moment (during the race or afterward) giving a damn about lost jobs and pensions in the Wolverine State. Hillary and Barack have each raised $100 million and John Edwards (outfunded by three to one) will no doubt throw in the towel in a few days.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.jim-freeman.com

Jim Freeman's op-ed pieces and commentaries have appeared in The New York Times, Chicago Tribune, International Herald-Tribune, CNN, The New York Review, The Jon Stewart Daily Show and a number of magazines. His thirteen published books are (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

WASHINGTON POST DEAD-WRONG IN CHILD PORNO EDITORIAL

The Trans Pacific Partnership, Yet another Opportunity to Chop-Shop America

Eric Holder Exposes A Nation of Law, Going Lawless

Liar's Poker at the Federal Reserve--"Can't anybody here play this game?"

Dressing Up Space Defense in Dominatrix Clothing

ARRIVAL TIME, 2010; A VIABLE THIRD-PARTY OPTION

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

media got you, too.... by Pat on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 1:42:16 AM
isn't the point of the article.But as long as ... by Jim Freeman on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 6:00:35 AM