Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
24 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Guns Everywhere? There's Got To Be A Better Way.

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


opednews.com

It's sad to say, but mass public shootings like the recent Virginia Tech massacre are an all too common American experience. The Associated Press recently reported that at least 100 Americans have gone on public shooting sprees since August 1, 1966, when sniper Charles Whitman hunkered down atop a tower on the University of Texas campus and started picking people off.

To put that in perspective, in the last forty years the number of mass firearm murders in the United States rivals the combined total of Super Bowls played, NBA champions crowned, and Olympics-summer and winter-held. If you're not in the habit of marking time by the passage of major sporting events, perhaps it's more relevant for you to consider that public shooting sprees in that time period outnumber the combined total number of Miss Americas crowned, Oscars for best picture presented and nominees for President of the United States selected by both major political parties.

Any way you look at the numbers, the apparent inability of government at all levels to prevent mass slaughter is frightening. That's why it's not surprising that many concerned gun owners would like to take matters into their own hands, suggesting, for example, that some of the victims of the Virginia Tech massacre might have been spared if students and professors had been allowed to carry guns on campus.

There is certainly truth in the claim that armed citizens have on occasion averted crime and saved lives. But given the nature of a firearm encounter and the variety of potential outcomes, it's very difficult to know if return fire from an armed citizen would turn out to be a good thing or a bad thing.

Even well trained law enforcement professionals occasionally make mistakes in the chaos of a shootout. It's uncommon but not unheard of that threatening but unarmed individuals are mistakenly shot when deadly force wasn't even necessary. And when guns are blazing from both sides, there is always the chance that victims who would have otherwise avoided danger are caught in the crossfire. The chances of such unintended consequences increase considerably when the crossfire is initiated by a shooter who doesn't have the experience or training that might minimize deadly mistakes.

Some have argued that even the possibility of armed response would be enough to deter many would-be killers. That seems overly optimistic to me. Nearly every one of these episodes has a very predictable and violent ending-the murderer is killed by either external or self-inflected gunfire. These murderers are obviously not afraid of facing the business end of a gun. It's even likely that some would prepare for and enjoy the challenge of a shootout against a relatively under-equipped and less prepared opponent.


Ultimately, it's impossible to mathematically determine if the possibility of return fire from potential victims is a net positive or a net negative. Historical data is non-existent and projections of lives saved and lost would be entirely subjective. But this is a decision that shouldn't be determined by that mathematical calculation anyway. That question-how many lives are saved by return fire from potential victims-isn't even the right question to ask. The question that ought to be asked is this: Is return fire from armed civilians the best we can do to prevent or impede mass shootings?

Unfortunately, that's a question our leaders in Washington have decided to ignore. There are a variety of reasons for their silence. Many believe government intervention would do more harm than good. Others believe it's a problem that should be dealt with at state and local levels. But too many have made the political calculation that it's a topic too hot to handle in the run-up to a presidential election.

That's too bad. I don't know if serious debate and discussion in Washington would make a difference. But I do know that there's got to be a better way than every man for himself.

 

http://www.brucewilson.blogspot.com

Bruce Wilson is the author of Disarming the Culture War: How the Silent Majority Can Break the Stalemate and his commentary has appeared in the Salt Lake Tribune, Chicago Tribune, Baltimore Sun, Deseret News, the American Enterprise, RealClearPolitics.com and RenewAmerica.us. You can learn more about him by visiting his website Commentary from Bruce Wilson.

Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Guns Everywhere? There's Got To Be A Better Way.

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 24 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Your column recycles some very old and tired argum... by Jim Clark on Thursday, Jun 7, 2007 at 9:55:57 AM
... by Barry Bright on Thursday, Jun 7, 2007 at 12:18:44 PM
Dear bruce   As a gun owner from texas&n... by mike on Thursday, Jun 7, 2007 at 3:25:06 PM
I am descended from a 1000 years of Italian noblem... by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Thursday, Jun 7, 2007 at 5:19:22 PM
... by Barry Bright on Friday, Jun 8, 2007 at 6:27:34 AM
Sorry but you need to recognize this fact: the gun... by TomK on Thursday, Jun 7, 2007 at 10:28:54 PM
... by Barry Bright on Friday, Jun 8, 2007 at 6:31:12 AM
There are nations with most people armed which do ... by Blue Pilgrim on Thursday, Jun 7, 2007 at 11:53:42 PM
... by Barry Bright on Friday, Jun 8, 2007 at 6:43:41 AM
Guns in homes are 22 times more likely to be used ... by John R Moffett on Friday, Jun 8, 2007 at 8:05:10 AM
Government: Soviet Union Year Citizens Disarmed: 1... by Joe Plummer on Friday, Jun 8, 2007 at 1:13:31 AM
... by Barry Bright on Friday, Jun 8, 2007 at 6:44:47 AM
... by Barry Bright on Friday, Jun 8, 2007 at 6:23:37 AM
... by Barry Bright on Friday, Jun 8, 2007 at 6:34:03 AM
In Israel in the 1st century, my ancestors of Rome... by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Friday, Jun 8, 2007 at 7:06:12 AM
PS-2, I own dozen guns was raised on them, mostly... by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Friday, Jun 8, 2007 at 7:18:46 AM
In the early 1980s I was in a tavern in Salem Oreg... by M. Bennett on Friday, Jun 8, 2007 at 11:27:57 AM
Before there were guns and still today, people use... by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Friday, Jun 8, 2007 at 5:36:31 PM
Three ways to reduce an otherwise intelligent Amer... by Andris on Saturday, Jun 9, 2007 at 4:22:38 AM
As I wrote, "Liberal" scum only support 'free spee... by Barry Bright on Saturday, Jun 9, 2007 at 8:18:17 AM
Jesus never said: "Force they neighbor to be ... by Barry Bright on Saturday, Jun 9, 2007 at 8:20:25 AM
That will be caused by "Liberal"(socialist/communi... by Barry Bright on Saturday, Jun 9, 2007 at 8:25:33 AM
bbright (Barry Bright) got the links to his own si... by Max Ward on Saturday, Jun 9, 2007 at 4:18:49 PM
If Barry Bright was ever faced with a one-on-one s... by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Saturday, Jun 9, 2007 at 9:05:13 PM