Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Justice Serves All? - Perhaps, none, but definitely ONE

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

opednews.com

For lack of a better word it will suffice to say the justice system in the U.S. totally sucks.  It is biased, prejudiced and unfair.  

It is safe to assume if two people commit murder and one is rich and one is poor, the wealthy defendant will receive a much lighter sentence than the individual that does not have the money to purchase adequate representation. 

Public defenders are provided for those that cannot afford a lawyer, but the fact is most public defenders have so many cases they really don't have time to give you their best effort.

In all too many cases the end result will be a negotiated plea agreement because the courts are overrun with cases and judges don't have time to listen to everyone's case, so an agreement between the two opposing attorneys is encouraged and the judge simply reviews and signs the agreed order.

If you're lucky or, unlucky enough, to actually stand before a judge and jury of your peers, remember jurors are simply average people and when you have a group of 12 people in any situation there is going to be one or two that are in control and will probably use their influence to sway the other jurors into their line of thinking.

As flawed as our system is, it worked for hundreds of years until we learned the power of the pen, or in this day and age, the power of a word processor.

The Whitehouse Press Release on June 8, 2007 indicated President Bush has added 9 people to his administration as follows:

President George W.  Bush today announced that he has named nine individuals to serve in his Administration:  

  • The President has named J. Michael Farren to be Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy Counsel to the President...
  • The President has named William Burck to be Deputy Assistant to the President and Special Counsel to the President...
  • The President has named Emmet Flood to be Deputy Assistant to the President and Special Counsel to the President...
  • The President has named Scott Coffina to be Associate Counsel to the President...
  • The President has named Amy F. Dunathan to be Associate Counsel to the President...
  • The President has named Francis Q. Hoang to be Associate Counsel to the President...
  • The President has named Al Lambert to be Associate Counsel to the President...
  • The President has named Michael Purpura to be Associate Counsel to the President...
  • The President has named Kate Todd to be Associate Counsel to the President...

Why does President Bush need NINE new counsels? 

Perhaps the answer is loopholes.  With enough legal loopholes our entire justice system can be overturned in no time at all.

An example of justice being overturned by a legal loophole is the pending motion before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia - United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby - also known as "Scooter Libby," Defendant.  CR. No. 05-394 (RBW)

When you can't win a case using the law as a defense what do you do?  You challenge the law! 

Scooter Libby lost his case and has been sentenced to 30 months in jail for his wrongdoings. 

Twelve professors, in an attempt to delay his sentence, have filed a Motion questioning the constitutionality of the appointment of Patrick Fitzgerald. 

VIKRAM AMAR, RANDY E. BARNETT, ROBERT H. BORK, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, VIET D. DINH, DOUGLAS W. KMIEC, GARY S. LAWSON, EARL M. MALTZ, THOMAS W. MERRILL, ROBERT F. NAGEL, RICHARD D. PARKER, AND ROBERT J. PUSHAW

ARGUMENT
THERE IS A SUBSTANTIAL, CLOSE QUESTION ABOUT THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE APPOINTMENT OF A FEDERAL PROSECUTOR WHO WAS NOT APPOINTED TO THE RELEVANT POSITION BY THE PRESIDENT AND TAKES NO ORDERS FROM A DEPARTMENTAL SUPERIOR, EVEN IF THAT PROSECUTOR IS REMOVABLE AT WILL

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Richard E Walrath and Patricia L Johnson are co-owners of the Articles and Answers News and Information sites.
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Crude Facts About Crude Oil

My Heart And Prayers Go Out To Jim Calhoun, A Major Victim In The Sandusky Crime Spree

Should Limits Be Placed on the Number of Organ Transplants an Individual Receives in their Lifetime?

The Effects Of Tax-Financed Spending V. Debt-Financed Spending

Sleep-Walking Through History with Reaganomics

Boehner -- Straddling the Fine Line between Extortion and Negotiation

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

There is the letter of the law and the spirit of t... by Archie on Tuesday, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:50:18 AM
Thank you for your comment.Both are important -&nb... by Patricia L Johnson on Tuesday, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:43:04 AM