Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Worrying and Puzzling Over Obama and the Banks

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 3/6/09

Become a Fan
  (33 fans)

I've been feeling more pain, again, where I contemplate the situation before us. It was a wonderful time, from Election Eve through the Innauguration.

But now we've gone a ways into this administration, and not everything I see is as reassuring as I'd like.

So I'm worrying. I'm worrying that our guy, Obama, may blow it, that he may be making mistakes that would be too costly to countenance.

Here are two things I believe to be true:

1) The success of Obama's presidency depends upon his successfully rescuing us from this financial/economic disaster he inherited. If he succeeds, the American people will follow him to all kinds of good places, and he will be the Transformational President that he has it in his heart and soul to be, and that I devoutly hope that he'll be able to be. But if he fails at this, the American people will turn away from his leadership.

That's a shame, since fixing the economy is not as right down Obama's alley as the kinds of things that are of the heart and soul and vision and moral conviction. But that's the hand he's been dealt.

2) The second thing I believe is that the key to solving the economic problem --declining production, rising unemployment, falling markets-- is properly addressing the banking problem. Get the banking situation squared away OK, and we'll bottom out and at least sooner or later rise, and people will feel OK. We know how to do "recession," and that's a whole lot better than the scary position the economy is in now.

We need for Obama to be very, very competent right now. And in some ways he does seem competent. But the economists I find most persuasive now on the issue of the banking crisis –people like Paul Krugman and Robert Kuttner and Dean Baker—seem deeply concerned that the Obama/Geithner approach is wrong-headed and inadequate.

So I’m worried: so much rides on his getting this right.


And I’m puzzled: why are the Obama-ites not following the path that not only liberals like Krugman, but also conservatives like Alan Greenspan, now espouse?

Should I believe that Geithner knows better than Krugman and the others? I somehow doubt it. Besides, Geithner and Krugman seem to me members of the same tribe of mainstream/liberal economists, both outstanding of kind, who speak the same language and likely understand the situation in similar terms. (And Geithner himself is quoted from the 1997 financial crisis saying the very kinds of things that would point toward doing what Krugman et all say to do.)

But if that’s so, why the gap between Krugman’s prescriptions and Geithner’s medicines?

Here’s one idea that occurs to me:

Perhaps the Obamites have combined a strategic political decision with their economic/financial decision.

Perhaps they sized up the situation, and saw that they could not take too many radical steps at the outset --and passing three-quarters of a trillion dollars as a stimulus package is a radical step-- and thus on this banking crisis they were going to use the failed approach for a little while, until its inadequacy becomes so clear that people beg Obama to do what he already knows he has to do, which is to do what Krugman et al want them to do.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


Andy Schmookler, an award-winning author, political commentator, radio talk-show host, and teacher, was the Democratic nominee for Congress from Virginia's 6th District. He is the author of various books including The Parable of the Tribes: The (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Like Colbert? Article Plus Critique

Mel Gibson's Rant as Profound Clue

To Anti-Obamite Lefties: It Doesn't Matter If You're Right

How Important is the Loss of Friendship?

The Mystery of Obama's Relationship with Power

Power and Corruption: Just What Is Their Relationship?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Dr. Smookler, a very good piece and you hit home w... by virginius "gin" arnold on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:01:36 PM


Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2015, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum