Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why Wikileaks is Labeled a "Terrorist Organization," and the Mainstream Press is Not

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 12/8/10

Wikileaks is a threat. We've heard it incessantly, from Democrats and Republicans, the State Department and Paypal. Some have gone so far as to call the open-publishing project a "terrorist organization."

It's true. Wikileaks is a threat. But it is not for any of the flimsy reasons we've been hearing.

The true threat of Wikileaks, and the reason it is being labeled a terrorist organization by both politicians and, disturbingly, some journalists, is not the content of its documents but the premise of its work.

Wikileaks is a "threat" because it challenges the secrecy, control and power upon which all mainstream media outlets and authoritarian regimes depend.

To understand the threat of Wikileaks, we need to step back and look at the changing media landscape. There has much hyperbolic talk about the "internet revolution" and blogs. Turn on CNN or go to any major media outlet, and they are frantically trying to find out what "The Bloggers" are doing. There is truth to some of this buzz--blogs represent a democratization of publishing, and although the most popular are about funny kittens and celebrities, there is potential here.

A limitation to this potential, though, is the fact that bloggers primarily rely on other people's reporting. Bloggers may skewer mainstream media, but they are bound to it. They hyperlink to it. For the few that are able to blog fulltime, they (mostly) still lack the time, resources, or training to break national stories. The vast majority are not calling sources, following leads, or tracking down documents: they are talking about what traditional media outlets are doing.

Meanwhile, newspapers are dwindling. Papers are downsizing. Bureaus are closing. News outlets are relying more heavily on wire content and fluff. Even top-tier dinosaur publications are struggling to create a news business model for a digital age. And as they are focused on staying alive, they are not focusing on investigative reporting.

Enter Wikileaks.

What's truly radical about Wikileaks is that it is a completely new model of journalism. It uses the web not to distribute content, but to distribute sources.

It's to say: Here are documents. Read them. Link to them. Write whatever you want. You don't have to be a White House correspondent. You don't have to have a "Deep Throat" or other high profile source. You don't have to be a so-called "real" journalist. You can be a blogger, an activist, a student, they are all equal.

To the mainstream press, this is a threat to a career which has increasingly become more about cozying up to politicians than speaking truth to power.

To the government, this is a threat to secrecy and control.

Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, has threatened to release a "poison pill" of documents if he is arrested or assassinated.

In many ways, the government and even some journalists have already swallowed that pill before he had the chance; politicians labeling Wikileaks a "terrorist organization," and reporters sickeningly labeling Wikileaks "subversion," are crystal clear indications of the power of this journalism model, and the potential it holds for holding both government and the fourth estate accountable.

UPDATE: Today the State Department proudly announced in a press release,"U.S. to Host World Press Freedom Day in 2011." Not even The Onion could have written a more Orwellian, perfectly-timed press release.

 

http://www.GreenIsTheNewRed.com

Will Potter is an award-winning reporter who focuses on how lawmakers and corporations have labeled animal rights and environmental activists as "eco-terrorists." Will has written for publications including The Chicago Tribune, The Dallas Morning News and Legal Affairs, and has testified (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Utah Bill: Videotaping a Factory Farm is Same as Assaulting a Police Officer

Appellate Court: Encouraging Civil Disobedience is Not Protected Speech

FBI Says Activists Who Investigate Factory Farms Can Be Prosecuted as Terrorists

The FBI and Federal Prosecutors Say My Journalism Is "Extremist"

Avatar Labeled "Recruiting Film for Eco-terrorists"

"Ag Gag" Bill Reintroduced in Florida, as Animal Activist Faces Felony for Photography

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
the admissions by Congress and the DOJ in Why does... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Wednesday, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:14:30 PM
The lights are on and the vermin are scrambling fo... by Donald on Thursday, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:56:04 AM