Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
  1
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  4
5 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
12 comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Why Progressives Should Press for Building-7 Exposure

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 11   Valuable 5   Supported 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

opednews.com

Progressives should press for exposure of the problems related to the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. (An abbreviated set of seven of these problems are available at the 7problemswithbuilding7.info website.) Thus far, these problems have been mostly hidden from the public. Exposure could provide a rallying point for efforts to bring accountability and justice in America. It can bring clarity to the press for transparency in government, and it can expose corporate Machiavellian manipulations that have clearly gone on relative to Building 7's collapse.

Transparency in government is badly needed, both within the Administration and in Congress. The happenings related to Building 7 make this abundantly clear.

Within the Administration, a number of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests have been submitted seeking records on the Building 7 collapse-analysis data. The final report on World Trade Center 7 was issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in November 2008; however, going on two years later, most requests have been denied. Most troubling is the reason given for denial. The Director of NIST has determined that release of the information "might jeopardize public safety." This reasoning is outrageous. If anything, not releasing the information might jeopardize public safety.

Congress is guilty of inhibiting transparency in government, for not insisting on accountability, by not holding any hearings on this subject. Apparently, to members of Congress, the collapse of Building 7 is a taboo subject. Yes, some members of Congress will listen to some of the troubling evidence involving the collapse, but the reasons given for not pursuing the matter are usually vague, such as there isn't a consensus this matter should be pursued.

Exposure of corporate Machiavellian manipulations relative to Building 7 is the other major reason this matter should be pursued. Major corporations in mainstream media, in major investment areas generally associated with Wall Street, and in the military/industrial complex should be parties of interest in this matter.

Mainstream media's collusion, for example, can be seen in the way the TV networks quickly let the collapse of Building 7 drop out of the news in the hours and days following the event. The visual image of the building descending at, what now has officially been acknowledged as a free-fall drop, should be a commonly-recognized image, but the obvious manipulations by the media has hidden that image from public view.

The failed financial giants Enron and Worldcom, mired in investigations of corporate fraud by the SEC prior to the Building 7 collapse, should have been brought to Justice by now. However, their records were "conveniently" housed in the SEC offices in Building 7. All these records were, apparently, lost. Why were these critical records not backed up at some other physical location? Isn't that standard procedure in both government and the industry?

And finally, is there not anyone interested in bringing accountability and justice to players within the Military/Industrial Complex? Profits abound from the War on Terror, all justified by the events of September 11, 2001. Many who have studied the available evidence feel the collapse of Building 7 is the Achilles heel in that day's events. Doesn't that at least warrant a new investigation of the Building 7 collapse? The ramifications would be so massive if it was found that the prior investigation was a fraud. It could bring into question the whole basis of the War on Terror, itself.

Aren't these reasons enough for progressives to set aside inhibitions they may have about looking into these matters? Isn't it important to have institutions we can have confidence in -- transparency in government that works as intended -- and corporate entities that don't trample the Main Street public?

 

Retired NASA flight research engineer. Listed on Patriots Question 9/11. Panel member, 9/11 Consensus. Member, Scientific Panel Investigating Nine Eleven (S.P.I.N.E.). Editor-in-chief, Secular Nation magazine (2006-2008).
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Is it Science or Honesty that NIST Lacks?

Why Progressives Should Press for Building-7 Exposure

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The failure of media to properly report the struct... by Daniel Noel on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:57:29 AM
If office fires were truly capable of fully implod... by Robert McGee on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:44:50 AM
Bravo, Dwain! Unfortunately, progressives are betw... by Phillip Michaels on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:01:46 AM
Anyone who takes even the most cursory glance at t... by Guy Razer on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 1:15:34 PM
This is an excellent photo. Though, it doesn't qui... by Dwain Deets on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:37:32 PM
Great article Dwain. How people still defend this ... by Dan Koch on Monday, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:49:07 PM
Anyone who takes even the most cursory glance at t... by Guy Razer on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 1:17:20 PM
It is outrageous that NIST would claimthat release... by Lips Malloy on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:01:06 PM
From the draft of the final report, before NIST ac... by Lips Malloy on Sunday, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:21:19 PM
Some day the 100th monkey will finally realize tha... by Jeeni Criscenzo on Monday, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:32:31 PM
Thanks to OpEdNews for publishing this; too few me... by Rich Besco on Tuesday, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:41:57 PM
Thank you OpEd for printing this article and to th... by Attaboyslim on Tuesday, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:50:59 PM