Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
42 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why Is a Progressive Think Tank Telling Obama to Escalate the War in Afghanistan?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 3/30/09
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

opednews.com

Posted on March 27, 2009, Printed on March 27, 2009
http://www.alternet.org/story/133612/

The Center for American Progress has positioned itself as a "progressive" Washington think tank, especially suited to channel new thinking and expertise into the Obama administration. It therefore is deeply disappointing that CAP has issued a call for a ten-year war in Afghanistan, including an immediate military escalation, just as President Obama prepares to unveil his Afghanistan/Pakistan policies to the American public and NATO this week.

It is likely that Obama will follow most of CAP's strategic advice, assuming the think tank to be the progressive wing of what's possible within the Beltway.

That means a long counter-insurgency war ahead, with everything from massive incarcerations and detention to Predator strikes that amass increasing civilian casualties. CAP begins by calling on the president to meet the request of his commander in Afghanistan for another 15,000 troops in addition to the 17,000 Obama already has committed, which would bring the near-term US total to 70,000. To pay for these additional troops, CAP proposes redirecting $25 billion annually from combat in Iraq to Afghanistan. In addition, CAP favors up to $5 billion annually for diplomatic and economic assistance, also from a redirection of Iraq spending.

Even assuming the economic assistance reaches villages instead of corrupt middlemen, CAP's primary emphasis is a military one, sending larger numbers of American troops on a counterinsurgency mission in southern and eastern Afghanistan, as well as the outskirts of Kabul. Make no mistake, the American mission will be to fight, kill and capture, and, is intended to leave NATO allies in secondary training roles. The CAP proposal seems to flesh out the Obama strategy already described in a New York Times January 28 headline, "Aides Say Obama's Afghan Aims Elevate War Over Development." The CAP report calculates that in FY 2009, "the ration of funding for military forces versus non-military international engagement is 18 to 1."



There is no exit strategy contemplated in the CAP proposal, although the president apparently is been asking for one behind the scenes. Nor is there any projected cap on future escalation The CAP timeline, front-loaded with military force, is as fanciful about Afghanistan/Pakistan as the neo-conservatives were towards Iraq in the Nineties:

    * In the next 18 months, a combat/counterinsurgency push to prevent Afghanistan from being a "safe haven for terrorist and extremist groups with a global reach"; prevent the destabilization of Pakistan by creating "a stable civilian government committed to working toward the elimination of terrorist safe havens" there.
    * In three to five years, create a "viable Afghan economy", curb the poppy trade, promote democracy and human rights, and resolve regional tensions.
    * In ten years, build an Afghan state that can defend itself, and "prepare for full military withdrawal."

As a practical matter, all that is certain is that there will be blood. When the problem is a nail, reach for the hammer. But military occupation, particularly a surge of US troops into the Pashtun region in southern Afghanistan and Pakistan, is the surest way to inflame nationalist resistance and greater support for the Taliban. President Hamid Karzai said last December that "the coalition went around Afghan villages, burst into people's homes and has been committing extraditional killings in our country." A United Nations investigator made the same point in 2008, accusing the CIA and Special Forces "of conducting nighttime raids and killing civilians in Afghanistan with impunity." Pakistan's prime minister said the same years that "if America wants to see itself clean of terrorists, we also want that our villages and towns should not be bombed." As a January 2009 report by the Carnegie Endowment concluded, "the only meaningful way to halt the insurgency's momentum is to start withdrawing troops. The presence of foreign troops is the most important element driving the resurgence of the Taliban."

CAP takes no notice of the torture and detention without human rights protections at Kabul's Bagram prison, now undergoing massive expansion. Obama's team already says his anti-torture executive order does not cover the hundreds detained in Afghanistan, so it is likely that the American forces will launch a massive "preventive incarceration" campaign in the months ahead. CAP's silence on this matter is especially disturbing since the think tank expressed deep concern over the same policies in Iraq.

Many Americans are confused, but it is not necessary to have a West Point or Ivy League degree to understand the heart of the matter. Whether it is the street of LA or the alleys of Kabul, law-and-order always comes first along with promises of jobs and development "later", a later that gradually becomes never. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, the levels of suffering are among the most extreme in the world, and from suffering, from having nothing to live for, comes the will to die for a cause.

United Nations recent development data places Afghanistan 173rd out of 178 countries; Pakistan is 136th. According to such estimates, about sixty percent of children in the Pashtun areas are "moderately" or "severely" stunted. In Afghanistan as a whole, such children will be spared miserable lives because the country has the highest infant mortality rate in the world. No more need be said.

As to the threat from al Qaeda, it is understandable that the president would define himself as an aggressive commander-in-chief. But he must wonder if our killing so many civilians and stunting so many children won't result in yet another generation dying to hate us. He must wonder if he is squandering the good will of the world, including the Muslim world, by sending more Americans to kill and die in a quagmire. He must recognize that he is putting his eight-year presidency on the line.

He must wonder too, as he approaches his meetings in Europe, why NATO is occupying countries so far from its base in the mainly-white Western world. It is hard to avoid the hint that the white man's burden is falling on the shoulders of our first African-American president. The only solution to the Afghanistan/Pakistan quagmires has to be a regional one, as argued forcefully by Tariq Ali in his recent book, as well as by Barnett Rubin and Ahmed Rashid, but NATO is the stranger in the neighborhood. CAP recognizes this critical problem, as does Hillary Clinton who will meet the regional players at the Hague next week. The problem is that NATO, burdened with imperial assumptions, would like China, Russia, and the Central Asian Republics constituting the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, to be satellite parties to the Western occupation of Afghanistan/Pakistan. But the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, while having serious stakes in quelling instability in the region, calls on the US and NATO to go home.

Can the burden be sustained politically and economically for ten years more? Already Canada and the Netherlands have set timelines for withdrawing their forces, assigned now to the most violent regions of southern Afghanistan. Germany may be the next to balk. And with the American economy in shambles, can anyone envision a war whose costs will exceed one trillion dollars a decade from now? Only the neo-conservatives, if Iraq is any example, which makes it tragic that CAP has aligned itself with their strategy of the "long war."

Tom Hayden was a leader of the student, civil rights, peace and environmental movements of the 1960s. He served 18 years in the California legislature, where he chaired labor, higher education and natural resources committees. He is the author of ten books, including "Street Wars" (New Press, 2004). He is a professor at Occidental College, Los Angeles, and was a visiting fellow at Harvard's Institute of Politics last fall.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.tomhayden.com

After fifty years of activism, politics and writing, Tom Hayden still is a leading voice for ending the war in Iraq, erasing sweatshops, saving the environment, and reforming politics through greater citizen participation.

Currently he is (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Tom Hayden on Mark Rudd

Why Is a Progressive Think Tank Telling Obama to Escalate the War in Afghanistan?

Congress Votes for War, 65 Dissent

Has Bratton's LAPD Really Reformed?

Torture Now an Afghanistan Issue

The Heartbreak in Wisconsin

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
19 people are discussing this page, with 42 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Since common sense, the will of the vast majority ... by cpaddock 1252335501 on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:07:19 PM
If these phony progressives think it's a good ... by Mr M on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:22:56 PM
Before Obama was elected I said all that will chan... by ConSion on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:04:04 PM
And oh so true. Coto knew Obama was a war monger f... by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:22:23 PM
Love it. The guy working on that billboard used to... by Patrick Lafferty on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:17:53 PM
I guess the gentleman who penned this brilliant ar... by Munich on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:21:37 AM
in supporting a president unconditionally. Especi... by jersey girl on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:10:56 AM
... it's just not official.... by Mr M on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:06:10 AM
I'd match your drawings against anything I've seen... by jersey girl on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:18:20 PM
... can do anything you want with my ass. ;-)... by Mr M on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:25:40 PM
... Rob is still the landlord.... by Mr M on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:51:55 AM
This piece is too funny coming from Tom Haden. Mr ... by Michael Cavlan on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:37:54 PM
The Taliban nearly eradicated opium production unt... by Rady Ananda on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:38:28 PM
Rady, when the Taliban took over Afghanistan, hero... by ConSion on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:18:32 PM
Obama has ordered a total of 21,000 more troops in... by Patrick Lafferty on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:56:16 PM
... play exposes you in good light. And that w... by Mr M on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:50:42 PM
and they are right.... by Steven Leser on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:34:55 PM
Ah, what a cute little ridicule, did you come up w... by Mr M on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:16:16 PM
... and have already volunteered while I was on ac... by Steven Leser on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:15:50 PM
... couple of weeks ago I saw where a grandmother,... by Mr M on Monday, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:50:37 PM
I know a man who is 45 in the reserves who got cal... by jersey girl on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:29:22 AM
Leser- "... and have already volunteered while I w... by Better World Order on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:48:07 AM
Don't hold your breath waiting for an answer. He w... by jersey girl on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:55:07 AM
which seems to be principally because he is attack... by Elizabeth Molchany on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:05:12 AM
The war there is about two things: drugs & fuel. I... by Cinderfella on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:02:03 AM
I am surprised once again to see no-one read the o... by E. Nelson on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:06:25 AM
... before we arrived. All we did is make a bad si... by Mr M on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:03:20 AM
On this one, Tom Hayden, whose energy and contribu... by Jim Pivonka on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:36:01 AM
There are other deserts to consider; for example t... by Allan Wayne on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:05:52 AM
I was wondering about that post to elizabeth. It s... by jersey girl on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:52:28 AM
WAR IS NEVER THE ANSWER !  War is a monstrous... by jersey girl on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:22:57 AM
Remember who started it all. It was Bush ( I disca... by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:31:05 AM
The US must have a war or two going to justify spe... by Roger Thomas on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:55:50 AM
If you want a little SUNLIGHT Why do any of u... by Patrick Lafferty on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:50:11 AM
Thank you for stating the obvious fact, which gets... by cpaddock 1252335501 on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:00:35 PM
I'm still waiting for Stephen to explain when Afgh... by Stanimal on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:28:12 PM
I'd be very surprised if Steven dared show his fac... by jersey girl on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:14:52 PM
I hear people talk about Tom Haden. I actually agr... by Michael Cavlan on Tuesday, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:32:01 PM
Haden, along with many others on the left lost the... by jersey girl on Wednesday, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:41:58 AM
Haden, along with many others on the left lost the... by jersey girl on Wednesday, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:42:43 AM
Yup. So seeing the likes of Tom haden, Carl D... by Michael Cavlan on Wednesday, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:16:06 PM
This might sound naive but I believe that the only... by Caronome on Monday, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:40:48 PM