Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
27 comments

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 10/9/12

What All Third Parties Can Agree On

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 5 pages)
OpEdNews Op Eds


opednews.com


What All Third Parties Can Agree On

October 9, 2012

By Roger Copple

The non-electoral methods of the Occupy Wall Street movement are energizing millions who have been alienated for a long time from the two-party system of sham that the 1% controls.  

Some reformers, most likely in support of the Occupy movement, are proposing an amendment to overturn the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling in 2010 that empowers corporations to unfairly influence political campaigns with large financial donations.  

But even if Citizens United was overturned, how many years would it take to make it happen, and would it make that much difference, considering all the other major democratic reforms needed?   I say no.  

All third parties already agree that the ballot access laws in each state should make it easier for third parties to get on the ballot.   Attempts to reform such laws have not been successful.   But even if ballot access laws were dramatically and miraculously improved, third parties, under the current system, would still not get as many votes as the Republicans and Democrats.

Fighting state-by-state battles for easier ballot access for third parties should still continue, but is there a long-term, national strategy that could fully empower third parties? Yes.   Third parties need to agree and widely publicize that they support a Twenty-Eighth Amendment proposal that revises Article V in our current constitution.   Such a proposal, as stated below, would make it easier to amend and also easier to abolish the current constitution.  

The amendment proposal below shows how a system of proportional representation can be used to elect Constitutional Convention delegates, who will then create a new constitution.   The new supreme document will truly reflect the collective will and current worldview of all Americans, not just the will of the far Right or the far Left.     Here is how the proposal could read:

Proposal for a Twenty-Eighth Amendment to Revise Article V: A Proposal That Shows How to Amend and How to Abolish the Constitution More Easily

The United States government can be changed through amendments added to the constitution.   It can also be modified when Congress passes new federal laws or statutes.   But to change the federal government completely by abolishing the constitution, there has to be a Constitutional Convention to rewrite a new constitution.   

How to Add Amendments to the Current Constitution

To change or modify the federal government by merely adding amendments to the Constitution, the United States Congress (including both the House and the Senate) must pass any proposed amendment to the Constitution with at least a 67% majority in both Houses.   Ratification by - of the state legislatures is no longer required.     

How to Abolish the 225-Year Old Constitution

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land.   A radically new constitution and government can be formed through a Constitutional Convention.   It can be achieved in a fair, orderly, and nonviolent way.  The American people have a right to choose whether they want a new constitution.   Through their chosen representatives, an entirely new constitution can be made.   For now on, the decision to create a new supreme civil document will be considered by the American people at every presidential election.   Congress, under these new guidelines, will not be allowed to pass any amendment that cancels this method for abolishing the constitution.  

Every 4 years when Americans vote for a president, they can vote for or against having a Constitutional Convention.   If 51% or more of the voters say yes, then 100 delegates, chosen through proportional representation, will be sent to the Constitutional Convention to create a new constitution.   Then if 51% or more of the Convention delegates approve any document, the new government will be implemented 4 months later.   The orderly process will take approximately 23 months.   

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Why We Should Revise Article V of the Constitution

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.NowSaveTheWorld.com (you have to type the 3 w's)

Roger Copple retired from teaching general elementary and high school special education in the public schools of Indianapolis in May 2010 at the age of 60. He now lives in Bradenton, FL and spends a lot of time trying to understand the world (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
27 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

An Amendment Proposal to Revise Article V by Roger Copple on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:20:59 AM
Amendments no longer require a supermajority of the States? by B. Ross Ashley on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:43:25 AM
A New Amendment Proposal by Roger Copple on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:37:45 PM
Paradise Lost by mijj mijj on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:06:09 PM
It's Not Hopeless Yet by Roger Copple on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:52:04 PM
Progressive Enemy by Techknowledgie on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:08:45 PM
Response to Progressive Enemy by Roger Copple on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:56:35 PM
U.S.Constitution by Phil Linehan on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:28:30 PM
It isn't the Constitution by prsmith on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:22:20 PM
I agree prsmith... by Swamper Tom on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:40:49 PM
Response to Swamper Tom by Roger Copple on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:48:23 PM
You're repeating yourself... by Swamper Tom on Wednesday, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:53:41 AM
Response to Swamper Tom by Roger Copple on Wednesday, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:05:18 PM
My Apology to Swamper Tom by Roger Copple on Thursday, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:22:43 AM
Response to Phil Linehan (US Constitution) by Roger Copple on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:29:34 PM
A new constitution by Jerry Wesner on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:03:24 PM
Exactly what I was thinking by Don Caldarazzo on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:16:28 PM
Response to Jerry Wesner by Roger Copple on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:51:19 PM
So, Roger. . . by prsmith on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:29:46 PM
Response to PRSmith, by Roger Copple on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:02:49 PM
The whole notion by Walter J Smith on Wednesday, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:54:09 AM
P. S by Walter J Smith on Wednesday, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:56:10 AM
Response to Walter J. Smith by Roger Copple on Wednesday, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:06:26 AM
Response to Walter J. Smith by Roger Copple on Wednesday, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:35:32 AM
You forgot something by landshark on Wednesday, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:39:01 AM
Reply to Landshark by Roger Copple on Wednesday, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:38:56 PM
Tweet: How and Why We Can Have a Constitutional Convention by Roger Copple on Thursday, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:08:23 AM