Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (7 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   27 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Waiting for the Revolution

By       Message Bob Burnett     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 4   Must Read 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 6/14/13

Author 93
Become a Fan
  (23 fans)
- Advertisement -

In the latest recovery, 93 percent of the gains went to the top 1 percent.  How long will it take before the 99 percent realize they're getting shafted?  When will American workers revolt?

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/59625437@N04/8349194121/: Tahrir Square protests 23 November 2011
Tahrir Square protests 23 November 2011 by IHRC

It's clear to most observers that the American economy has lost its heart and now is being run for the benefit of the rich.  Over the past twenty years, US GDP and productivity increased while average household income was stagnant. 

There's no shortage of insightful commentary on US economic inequality. Nonetheless, American workers don't seem to be distressed about what's happening.  A 2012 Gallup Poll asked, "Do you think the United States benefits from having a class of rich people"?" 63 percent of respondents answered yes.  Gallup asked those who do not consider themselves to be rich if they would like to be rich and the majority answered yes.                                

This Gallup poll reveals two levels of delusion.  The first is the widespread belief that if you're not rich now you may someday be rich.  A recent study by the Federal Reserve found that most Americans stay in the class they were born into.  "If you were born in the bottom 20%, your chances of ending up in the top 20% are about one in 20: 5%."

The second delusion is about the level of economic inequality.  Writing in the Washington Post, Ezra Klein observed that Americans consistently underestimate how skewed income inequality is; it's far worse than they imagine.

Nonetheless, it's too simplistic to blame ignorance or apathy for America's indifference to the growing economic divide.  Each age cohort has its own denial mechanism. 

Millenials (born after 1980) are struggling to make it.   Their unemployment rate is greater than 16 percent and 43 percent are burdened by  student-loan debt, typically more than $100,000.  Millenials are depressed.

- Advertisement -

Those in Generation X (born between 1965 and 1980) are self-absorbed.  It's a cohort that suffers from a deadening combination of cynicism and narcissism.

The Boomers (born between 1946 and 1964) have seen many of their dreams slip away.  Now they're anxious about their retirement and what the future holds for their children. 

Finally, members of the Silent Generation (born between 1928 and 1945) are despondent.  They wonder what happened to the country they fought for.

Most of the 99 percent are traumatized.  Many deal with this by self-medicating.  Some turn to therapy.  And millions rely on religion.

41 percent of Americans believe the end times are near; they feel Jesus Christ will return by 2050.  If you're of this persuasion, it's unlikely that you're concerned with temporal matters, such as income inequality.  Besides, most Christians who believe in the rapture are Calvinists -- they think the rich are the elected, the chosen ones.  The version of Christianity developed by the sixteenth century French theologian, john Calvin, taught that God has predestined who will be saved. In "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism," German sociologist Max Weber observed that Calvinists see worldly success as a measure of the likelihood of one's salvation. 

- Advertisement -

For a variety of reasons, most Americans have chosen to ignore the ever-widening economic divide.  That doesn't mean the 99 percent will stay unconscious forever. But it does mean workers won't spontaneously rise up and cast off their chains.  They have to be mobilized.

From a progressive perspective, it's clear what needs to be done.  Workers need to be paid a living wage; they need to acquire an equitable share of the benefits that have arisen from the economic recovery.  Therefore, CEO salaries should be limited along with CEO-to-worker pay ratios.  Unions must be strengthened.  Taxes should be increased for the 1 percent and estate taxes restored.   We must eliminate corporate tax loopholes and raise corporate taxes.  The government has to breakup big corporations, penalize monopolistic practices, and prosecute corporate fraud. 

The Progressive challenge is accomplishing these objectives in the face of worker inertia and fierce conservative opposition.  Progressives shouldn't expect to outspend plutocrats and corporations.  Progressives have to out organize them -- that's what happened in the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections. 

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Well Said 4   Must Read 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer. In a previous life he was one of the executive founders of Cisco Systems.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ten Telltale Signs of Republican Disease

Big Liars and The Voters Who Love Them

Obama vs. Romney: The Bottom Line

The GOP Chooses Fascism

2011 Budget Battle: Obama Wins While Democrats Lose

Obama vs. Romney: The Popularity Contest