Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

View of Obama through Socialist eyes

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Obama at the Business Roundtable
14 March 2009 

On Thursday, President Barack Obama spoke before the Business Roundtable, an organization of leading corporate CEOs. Obama used the opportunity to deliver a paean to American capitalism.

The speech, delivered in the midst of the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression, had an air of provocation against the American people about it. Not a few of the CEOs assembled at the conference have overseen the ruination of their own corporations. Collectively, they bear responsibility for the economic collapse and the impoverishment of millions of Americans and hundreds of millions the world over.

Sixty-five CEOs from top corporations attended the event. Prior to Obama, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Education Secretary Arne Duncan, Budget Director Peter Orszag and energy czar Carol Browner addressed the gathering, each promising to cooperate with big business in the formation of policy.

Before this audience, Obama presented an utterly false image of American capitalism. "Your companies have fueled the prosperity of communities across the country and the success stories of countless individuals," Obama declared. "They've enriched our nation; they've served as a tribute to the enduring spirit of American capitalism.... You've looked beyond the bottom line and the next quarter to the long-term health of your company. You've not only served as accomplished leaders, but as engaged citizens."

This homage to American capitalism turns reality on its head. Had Obama the ability to speak truthfully to the CEOs, he might have told them something like this: "Your companies have ruined communities and broken lives across the planet. You've impoverished the nation to your own benefit and exposed the ruthlessness and parasitism of American capitalism before the eyes of the world. Your overriding concern for immediate profits has destroyed your own companies and the entire financial system. Your control of industry and finance, and through them your domination of government, has resulted in a social disaster of epic proportions."

In his comments, Obama made clear that the central point of the gathering was to reassure the financial elite that there will be no limit to the resources his administration will place at their disposal.

"The only way we can truly unlock credit and heal our financial system for good is to address the state of our banking system," Obama explained. "And I know that this crisis is at the top of your list of immediate concerns—and I promise you, it is at the top of mine, as well."

Passing out trillions of dollars to the financiers is not, however, at the "top of the list" for most Americans. The crisis bears down on the working masses in quite a different way than it affects the CEOs, threatening the livelihoods, homes and lives of millions of people.

Obama used the speech to defend last month's stimulus legislation. Sections of business denounced the nearly $800 billion package, singling out for criticism its modest appropriations for social programs and infrastructure and its longer-term ramifications for the federal deficit. However, they have raised few concerns about the bailout of the financial industry, which may now exceed $8 trillion.

To placate such right-wing criticism, Obama pledged his support for big business. "I've always been a strong believer in the power of the free market," he said. "It has been and will remain the very engine of America's progress—the source of a prosperity that has gone unmatched in human history. I believe that jobs are best created not by government, but by businesses and entrepreneurs like you who are willing to take risks on a good idea. And I believe that our role as lawmakers is not to disparage wealth, but to expand its reach; not to stifle the market...."

Obama presented his tax policies as highly favorable to the business elite. "For the top 3 percent of all taxpayers," he said, "the top tax rate across the board will still be lower than they were during the prosperity of the 1990s. It will still be lower than they were during the Clinton era. You will pay a tax rate on capital gains and dividends that is also lower than it was during most of the 1990s."

In the question-and-answer period following Obama's remarks, two CEOs raised veiled criticisms of specific Obama policies. Samuel Palmisano, CEO of IBM, questioned Obama about his campaign promise to close tax loopholes on corporations that earn profits overseas. Obama indicated that he would compensate any closures in this "deferral tax" loophole by lowering the overall tax rate on corporations. He also indicated that groups like the Business Roundtable could cooperate with the Treasury in drafting tax policy. "I don't want you to be placed at a competitive disadvantage with other countries," he said.

Another CEO, Daniel S. Fulton of Weyerhaeuser, warned that Obama's "cap and trade" proposals on carbon emissions would be too costly for business. Obama abandoned the proposal, a prominent part of his presidential campaign, on the spot. "We are not going to be able to move this in an effective way without partnership with the business community," he said. "But we just—we can't get it done."

Obama was warmly received by the CEOs in attendance. The chairman of the proceedings, Harold McGraw, said that the popular presentation of business hostility toward Obama "couldn't be farther from the truth."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://earthhome.us

For 17 years Gene Messick studied and taught Design at NC State University and Cornell. Co-founding the Visual Design Program at NCSU, he established the Photography Program at Cornell, where he taught in the Architecture Department, most interested (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Editor

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Facing Socialism in America

Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson pulled another fast one on American taxpayers.

How can you visualize a trillion dollars?

Opportunities to deal with sociopaths in American politics

Is a forced-feeding tube through your nose "torture"?

More about sociopaths in American politics

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Well, somehow I am just not surprised to "lea... by William Whitten on Monday, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:18:46 PM
is really neither liberal nor progressive. it is r... by Jack Harrington on Monday, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:18:37 PM
"I take minor issue with your idea of getting... by William Whitten on Tuesday, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:39:14 PM