Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats

Sci Tech

U.S. Medical Science Corrupted By Chlorine Cartel

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H4 6/4/10

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention seem to not know what a
typical cigarette is.

http://health. health-news/ family-health/ cancer/articles/ 2010/06/01/
more-cancer- causing-chemical s-in-us-cigarett es

"TUESDAY, June 1 (HealthDay News) -- American cigarettes could pack a
more toxic punch than foreign brands, say researchers at the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In one of the first studies of its kind, researchers compared the levels
of tobacco-specific nitrosamines -- a main carcinogenic component of
tobacco -- in cigarette butts and in smokers from several countries.


~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~

******* These "researchers" have crafted incomplete, misleading and
deceptive results. This cannot be accidental. The phrase "tobacco
specific nitrosamines" gives away the problem.

How the CDC, in addressing cancer, can ignore all the cancer-causing
pesticide residues in typical cigarettes, the dioxin-creating chlorine
chemicals and the chlorine-bleached paper, the carcinogenic levels of
radiation from certain Still Legal phosphate fertilizers, and the little
fact that a typical cigarette may not even be made from tobacco is a
question. It's a question the CDC cannot answer, and certainly does not
care to be asked.

The dioxins (from industrial chlorine, impossible from tobacco or any
plant) are not only cancer-causing themselves, they are "promoters" of
cancer, accelerating the cell damage. The CDC has no problem with
that---preferring to cast the blame onto Mother Nature's un-patented,
conveniently "sinful", tobacco and nicotine. Un-informed, un-protected,
secretly-poisoned smokers are also blamed, of course. Big Chlorine
paper pulp, etc.) is off the hook again. Its license to poison, kill,
and evade liabilities and criminal consequences has not yet been
revoked. This epidemic situation regarding "studies" of "smoking" and
"tobacco" represents easily the most widespread corruption of medical
science in history. That "tobacco kills" has been made a tenet of
corporate religion. That Industrially-Contaminated Smoking Products is
the big killer is heresy.

By this routine disregard for chlorine in typical cigarettes, and the
resultant high levels of dioxin in the smoke, everyone, not just
smokers, remains endangered by chlorine and dioxin. Everyone's tax
dollars pay for the bogus "science" and illegitimate subsequent laws.
Chlorine keeps its "good name". It's as if Rachel Carson never lived.

If there are more of those nitrosamines in U.S. cigarettes, it
can only come from is the nicotine extract added to the cigarettes if
contain tobacco or not. Manufacturers require uniform nicotine levels in

each cigarette. They cannot depend on tobacco leaves having uniform

This his is about adding something to the products...not about some
mysteriously more potent tobacco plants.

As for the FDA--- The FDA is specifically forbidden by the "tobacco
regulation" law from doing anything about the agricultural parts of the
cigarette industry. True. The FDA may not set foot on a tobacco farm
to see the 450 or so different pesticides registered for tobacco use.
The FDA many not test a cigarette, or a smoking victim, for agricultural
chemicals. The FDA cannot stick a Geiger Counter into the
The FDA may not visit any Curing Sheds to see the pesticides used
there. And---the FDA, apparently, cannot even look at all the kinds of

agricultural waste cellulose, none likely organic, used, in patented
ways, to make fake

Next Page  1  |  2


Long time activist in areas relating to industrial toxics, media content and control, death penalty, Mumia Abu-Jamal, hemp prohibition, civil rights, insurance influence in public governing, religious influence in public governing, unsafe foods, (more...)
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Health Care Cartoons

"Fire Safe" Means Not Fire Safe

Health Care Cartoons II

How The Left Serves the Corporatocracy

Pesticide Industry War On Mothers

Health Care Cartoons III


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

All vegetable matter contains phenol. Combine that... by Matthew Peters on Sunday, Jun 6, 2010 at 11:52:07 AM
Didn't know before about PCBs in smoke from typica... by John Jonik on Sunday, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:23:26 PM