OpEdNews Op Eds

Top US Official Confirms Pakistan Facing Threat

Become a Fan
  (7 fans)
By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 3/23/09

opednews.com

OpEdNews is the first news outlet which hinted at the threat to the very integrity of Pakistan, which is frontline state in war on terror months ago. But now the new US administration has succeeded in bringing stability to Pakistan, but still a lot to be done. The confirmation of top US official that Pakistan is facing serious threat and needing more attention is a proof that OpEdNews is the most credible and progressive media outlet.

Though there may be a lot of people, who will not agree with me, but this is the fact that Pakistan is needing more attention of the world. Actually Pakistan system of goverance is corrupt, therefore, it has failed to face the threat from terrorism. Now the people are looking to the US for remedy. Till now the US new administration headed by Barack Obama has shown very good performance. One thing should be kept in mind no problem can be resolved through use of military force. Democracy is the best weapon through which terrorism can easily be defeated. The US diplomacy is successful at the moment.

The Pakistani state could collapse within six months if immediate steps are not taken to remedy the situation, warned a top adviser to the US Central Command.
 
David Kilcullen, who advises CENTCOM commander Gen. David H. Petraeus on the war on terror, urged US policy makers to focus their attention on Pakistan as a failure there could have devastating consequences for the entire international community.
 
In an interview to The Washington Post published on Sunday, Kilcullen, who is credited with the success of the US troop surge strategy in Iraq, warned that if Pakistan went out of control, it would "dwarf" all the crises in the world today.
 
"Pakistan, hands down. No doubt," he said when asked to name the central front in the war against terror.

 
Asked to explain why he thought Pakistan was so important, Kilcullen said: "Pakistan has 173 million people, 100 nuclear weapons, an army bigger than the US Army, and al-Qaeda headquarters sitting right there in the two-thirds of the country that the government doesn't control."
He claimed that the Pakistani military and police and intelligence service did not follow the civilian government; they were essentially a rogue state within a state.
 
"We're now reaching the point where within one to six months we could see the collapse of the Pakistani state, also because of the global financial crisis, which just exacerbates all these problems," he said.
 
"The collapse of Pakistan, al-Qaeda acquiring nuclear weapons, an extremist takeover--that would dwarf everything we've seen in the war on terror today."

 
Kilcullen, an Australian anthropologist who advises governments on Muslim militancy throughout the West, disagreed with the suggestion that it was important to kill or capture Osama bin laden.
 
He discussed two possible scenarios for catching the al-Qaeda leader. Scenario one is, American commandos shoot their way into some valley in Pakistan and kill bin Laden.
 
This, Kilcullen said, would not end the war on terror and would make bin Laden a martyr.

 
The second scenario: a tribal raiding party captures bin Laden, puts him on television and says, "You are a traitor to Islam and you have killed more Muslims than you have killed infidels, and we're now going to deal with you." They could either then try and execute the guy in accordance with their own laws or hand him over to the International Criminal Court.
 
"If that happened, that would be the end of the al-Qaeda myth," said Kilcullen.
 
He said that three lessons learned in Iraq could also apply to Afghanistan. The first one is to protect the population. "Unless people feel safe, they won't be willing to engage in unarmed politics," he argued.
 
The second lesson is to focus on getting the population on America's side and making them self-defending. And then a
third lesson is to make a long-term commitment.
 
Kilcullen said that the Obama administration's policy of reaching out to moderate elements of the Taliban also had several pitfalls.
 
"If the Taliban sees that we're negotiating for a stay of execution or to stave off defeat, t
hat's going to harden their resolve," he warns.
 
"I'm all for negotiating, but I think the chances of achieving a mass wave of people turning against the Taliban are somewhat lower in Afghanistan than they were in Iraq."

Source: dawn.com

 

Muhammad Khurshid, a resident of Bajaur Agency, tribal areas situated on Pak-Afghan border is journalist by profession. He contributes articles and news stories to various online and print newspapers. His subject matter is terrorism. He is also (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Is Osama Alive Or Really Dead?

Public Execution By Taliban Increases Terror In Tribal Areas

Obama Doing Well On The Foreign Front

US, Pakistan Heading Toward A Complete War

'Jaw Jaw Is Better Than War War'

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

before the US attacked Afghanistan and bombed that... by Elizabeth Molchany on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:30:39 PM
But I am not sure that what you wrote addresses mu... by Steven Leser on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:51:18 PM
I wish I had the courage you have.... by Steven Leser on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:49:08 PM