Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 47 (50 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   14 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

To The American Media: Time To Face The Reality Of Election Rigging

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 10   Supported 6   Valuable 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 4/9/11

Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

                                                                                                  April 8, 2011

To every Journalist and Media Reformer assembled here in Boston:

How does the Big Lie flourish and prosper?   By being criminal beyond belief.     By operating in safety behind a towering "never happen here" wall of denial.   By a foolish assumption of immunity. By being too big a story to be a story within the bounds of journalistic decorum.  

The gruesome truth is that American elections can be rigged and are being rigged because the American media treats election rigging as something that--all evidence notwithstanding--could never happen here.   Period, end of story, move on.

And we are moving on. To an unrecognizable America.   An America in which, when even obscene amounts of cash can't buy enough votes, those votes can be manufactured (added, switched, deleted wholesale) in the darkness of cyberspace.   It's too easy.   And it's happening.   A Big Lie is consuming America.

We ask each of you in turn--reporter, editor, commentator, reformer--are you willing to sit back and let this happen on your watch?   Can you take 15 minutes to stand before this picture, taking it in, and then ask yourself, if we have been persuasive, what you are going to do?

Let's begin with the voting and counting process itself.   It is now virtually everywhere in America a computerized process and those computers are under the proprietary control of a handful of corporations. Would you cheerfully hand your vote to a little man behind a curtain and wait for him to come back out and tell you who won?   What if he were wearing a "Peace" button, or a "Palin-For-President" button, or some other partisan identifier?  

How is what we are doing as we vote in America any different?  

Study after study--from Princeton, to Johns Hopkins, to NYU's Brennan Center, to the California Secretary of State's office, to the GAO itself ( see http://tinyurl.com/3hz7xj2 ) --conclude that this counting process is obscenely vulnerable to insider manipulation and outsider hacking.   So have many studies examining computerized voting abroad--which is why countries such as Germany, Ireland, and Holland have begun turning back to human counted ballots. There is consensus verging on unanimity among the experts.

How comfortable are you with that? Can you go about your business with democracy hanging from such a thin thread, with America that exposed to a silent coup?

Perhaps we should leave it there.   Because it makes sense, does it not, that we can't continue to accept the risk of systemic sabotage inherent in such a counting process.   Not when a return to public hand counting of the federal and statewide contests would restore transparency and remove the risk of wholesale manipulation, at a civic burden far smaller than jury duty.   Surely we can take a few hours every two years to count some votes for our democracy.

It is a slam dunk. Or should be.   Except . . . , as with global warming and other incipient disasters, mere vulnerability to something that might happen proves to be a poor motivator of decisive and courageous action.   We reform in the wake of calamity, not in anticipation of it.

And here we come to the crux of our dilemma and to our Catch-22.   Because as long as we speak or write about vulnerabilities and hypotheticals, there seems to be at least the hope of dialogue.   Heck, some among the media--Lou Dobbs comes to mind--have raised the very issue in the run-up to elections: "Will Your Vote Be Counted? Tune in tomorrow."   But that permissible question proves transient, and it evaporates as the votes are counted on Election Night and following.   Any attempt to offer evidence of actual manipulation, actual theft?   Not welcome.   Forget it.   Omerta.  

How come? Is it because it remains beyond the pale of belief that such easy vulnerability is actually being exploited?   This even in the age of Barry Bonds, A-Rod, Lance Armstrong, Alberto Contador, Bernie Madoff, Goldman Sachs, and the whole parade of high-stakes cheating scandals, not to mention the mounting wave of cybercrime, to which even sophisticated financial institutions and the Pentagon have proven vulnerable?   Elections are the highest stakes game of all.  

But America is the Beacon of Democracy dammit--it could never happen here.   So Americans are instructed--by you, the media--to accept on pure faith that those in control of, or having access to, our privatized and concealed voting systems will devoutly serve the public trust rather than any conflicting private or partisan agenda.   Any evidence that this faith is misplaced is ignored.   Too dangerous.   Too destablizing.   Too disturbing.   Too un-American.   And yet, without this evidence, everything is just hypothetical, vulnerable, possible, and there is no imperative for change.

So we now bring forth a synopsis of the "evidence," knowing well that it has been as indigestible as shards of glass.   We know of no easy way to make it go down.   We know only that we continue to ignore it at our great peril.   The grave of a democracy is a mass grave--there's room for all of us.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

www.ElectionDefenseAlliance.org

Jonathan Simon, a graduate of Harvard College and New York University School of Law, is a member of the Bar of Massachusetts. He is also a Chiropractic Physician and directs the clinic Hands-On Health Associates in Cambridge.

As a (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Occupy Movement, Rigged Elections, and the Bastille Line

Preliminary election assessment from Election Defense Alliance

The Democratic Primaries 2008: Managing Electoral Dynamics Via Covert Vote-Count Manipulation

Election Forum: Election Integrity vs. HR 550

Independent Exit Polls (IEP) 2006: The EDA Plan and How You Can Help

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 people are discussing this page, with 14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

It's about time someone expressed what so many of ... by Jonathan Simon on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:06:11 AM
The media are bribed and what they are bribed to d... by bogi666 on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:22:39 AM
If true, this is the biggest bombshell to hit the ... by Don Smith on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:49:47 AM
In political monoculture weigh of elections does n... by John Smith on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 12:01:51 PM
In political monoculture weigh of elections does n... by John Smith on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 12:03:35 PM
For me, the most disturbing aspect of the charges ... by Hubert Steed on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:53:54 PM
I decided to remove myself from the USA and become... by maheanuu on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:37:06 PM
First, let me say that there has been election fra... by Dennis Kaiser on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 3:36:23 PM
The site you gave us http://seevote.com doesn't ex... by George Ripley on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:40:46 AM
and I went through it once in a local South Florid... by Bill Hare on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 6:24:15 PM
Americans are in deep denial about so many things.... by intotheabyss on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:30:30 AM
because we found the official count to be less tha... by John Russell on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:11:07 PM
I think the author will agree that it is critical ... by Andy Fields on Tuesday, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:34:22 AM
Andy--You are correct that detractors will seize u... by Jonathan Simon on Tuesday, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:51:36 AM