OpEdNews Op Eds

Thoughts on Anti-Corporatist-Duopoly Ways to Approach the 2012 Election

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 5   Must Read 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 9/8/12

Become a Fan
  (288 fans)
- Advertisement -
Progressives are taking different approaches to the 2012 elections. 

A non-scientific poll of left of liberal Opednews readers has revealed:
Some are supporting Obama 
Some are supporting  Rocky Anderson or Jill Stein
Some are intentionally not voting-- "boycotting the election."
Some are voting against both Romney and Obama-- against the corporatist Duopoly
A small percentage are not sure. 
One percent are voting for Romney.

- Advertisement -
Here's my take on these approaches, but first, you might want to listen, to get in the mood, to Pennywise's song.

Here's an excerpt from the lyrics:
- Advertisement -

Someday you gotta find another way, you better right your mind   
and live by what you say 
Today is just another day unless you set your sights and try to find a way 
I say f*ck authority 
Silent majority 
Raised by the system 
Now it's time to rise against them 
We're sick of your treason 
Sick of your lies 
f*ck no, we won't listen 
We're gonna open your eyes 
Frustration, domination, feel the rage of a new generation, 

First, overall, I feel that there's not much hope that electoral politics will produce change in the US. I've written off any serious expectations that even Democrats will stand by their consituents when they have a choice of supporting constituents or the corporations and billionaires who buy their TV ads. 

We need to put energy into six major efforts:

1-end the two party system and get instant run-off voting (IRV) or something like it in place at a national level. I realize that there are criticisms to IRV, and alternatives. I'm just saying we need something that allows people to select their first choice and then, also, their choice of the lesser of two evils.

2- Eliminate computerized voting and replace it with verifiable, re-countable paper ballot voting. The USA's computerized voting system will, someday, be viewed as a shameful episode of history-- either by a USA that repudiates this system that is so vulnerable to corruption, or by other democratic nations that label the third world fascist state the US has become a failure of democracy. 

3-Reform election finance and end the disaster that Citizens United has wrought.  It will probably take a constitutional amendment to do it. Take all private, corporate, union money, PAC money and "non-profit" money and resources out of politics. Make all elections totally government funded. Actually, if one of the five right wingers on the supreme court is replaced, all it would take would be a simple decision to overturn Citizens United. The same could apply to the right to corporate personhood. If the five right wingers were able to overturn 100 years of precedent to set the Citizens United ruling, then a new five can use THAT precedent to overturn the original supreme court ruling that established the right of corporate personhood. 

4-End Corporate Personhood. The Terminator movie series shows a world where humanity is being wiped out by inhuman things that humans created. That world exists now. The difference is instead of cyborg robots being the threat, transnational corporations, run by sociopaths, are the threat. 

5-Totally revamp the educational system. The current system is still based on the Prussian model of education that was designed to produce obedient factory workers and soldiers. We need a new system that's been described by Paulo Freire and John Taylor Gatto who described educational approaches that teach people to THINK and to challenge information, rather than simply memorize and "bank" information. We need to offer college education for free to all who qualify and we need to take major steps to stop and reverse the privatization and profitization of education. 

6- Establish once and for all that everyone gets to vote, without ID cards or any other impediments to access to the voting booth. History will look at the efforts of 2012 to disenfranchise millions of voters as another shameful element of the white, top-down right's dying effort hold on to control as the bottom-up revolution continued to unfold.

Okay, so that's what needs to be done. Here's my take on the different approaches progressives, lefties, socialists and anarchists seem to be taking.

Boycotting the vote: 
The two party system is rotten to the core. But the vote is the key to democracy. Currently the duopoly has corrupted the system, including the effects of Citizens United.  But the answer is not to stay out of the voting process. The answer is to stay in the game, to vote against the two party system as much as possible and even then, with some caveats. 

Voting Third Party:
If you are in a solid blue or red state-- vote third party, to show your dissatisfaction, contempt, opposition to the two party fraud that is really a duopoly. If you are worried about Obama, that's fine. But if you are in a solid blue state, your vote won't matter. 

If you are in a swing state, for some it's a much tougher call. There, your vote can make a huge difference in the big race between corporatists Obama and Romney. Your participation in the pre-election day actions-- canvassing, phone banking, donations-- can make a big difference. I can see some progressives taking different approaches:
-canvassing and supporting Obama pre-election, then voting for him, or voting third party. 
-canvassing and support third party candidates then voting for them or voting for Obama. 
-staying home, not participating in the process at all. 

I also think that sending the anti-two-party message can be effective if you split your ticket. Particularly look at local candidates from all parties. Find out about them, get to know them. Do good citizen diligence and don't write off everyone. 

Voting for Romney
I think there's a small contingent of contrarian voters who are thinking that the way to get the masses to rise up is to raise the temperature on the boiling frogs, that if Romney wins, the people who voted Democratic might finally get out into the streets. I'm not one of them, but I do think that if Romney wins there may be a greater likelihood of enough street protests to actually make a difference-- if Romney doesn't order people arrested or shot.

Voting for Obama-- about 20% of the poll respondents said they were voting for Obama. Generally, they cite the Supreme Court as the number one reason. More on Obama supporter thinking below. 

First, I've received a number of emails, like these:
email subject heading: THIS MAKES ME SICK AT HEART
Dear Rob,
I just read your poll info and am appalled at the results.
The poll I posted yesterday has produced some very interesting results. Here it is. What about the Greater of Two Evils? Taking the Temperature at Opednews
For example, only 17 of OEN readers are voting for Obama. About two thirds are going third party. OEN is covering the whole election picture, including those who oppose voting or just don't give a damn (12% of our poll respondents.)
You're not going to see that kind of coverage elsewhere.
Last month, John Boehner called his Tea baggers in Congress, "knuckle dragging Neanderthals" in a rare moment of candor.
I don't know what to call our progressives who are disappointed in Obama and so won't vote for him. Maybe delusional? How can any American not know that voting for third parties is the same as voting for the Republicans? Do they not know that like it or not, we have a two party system? I could see voting for other parties if we had a parliamentary system. Then their votes would translate into seats in parliament. BUT WE DON'T. 
Do they not remember that voting for Nader in Florida gave us Bush, a conservative Supreme Court, Citizens United and every other horrible Supreme Court 5 to 4 decision for the conservative causes? And the knuckle-dragging Tea baggers.  People who don't vote, don't deserve to live in a democracy.
Disappointed progressives seem to think the election is all about their feelings. It's perfection they want or they will sulk and pout. When did politics have anything to do with perfection. Or for that matter, promised made at election time. This sets my hair on fire. If Obama loses because of the loss of left wing pouties, we will lose our democracy for sure and then not voting will be the order of the day. International corporations will decide everything according to the law of the Republicans.

And here's another lovely email, in response to my mailing yesterday, announcing the poll results:
Third Party....60 days before the election? YOu're a total a**hole, ROB!
So, it's getting ugly out there. There's a pattern I see among Obama-supporting Democrats. They accuse progressives of being un-realistic and impatient, of wanting too much too fast. They excuse Obama for not getting more done, assuming that's the big issue for progressives who have written Obama off, and blame the nasty Republicans for keeping him from doing all the knight in shining armor stuff they assume he would have done otherwise. 

That's nonsense to me. I never expected much from Obama, especially after he appointed DLC leader and former Clinton chief of staff John Podesta to run the transition team, even less after he appointed progressive-hating Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff. But I did expect him to keep his promises-- to close Guantanamo, to end torture. And I did not expect him to be the worst president in history when it came to the treatment of Whistleblowers. I didn't expect him to cut a deal with hospitals and big Pharma that promised to exclude the public option, never mind single payer. 

There's another angle that Obama supporters raise-- the accusation that it was Nader's fault that Gore lost to Bush. The truth is that Gore won, but the SCOTUS Republicans decided to appoint Bush president before the counting was through. And if the Democrats had been tougher and Gore had fought harder, Bush would have been trounced. There's another angle too, commented on by OEN regular,    Michael Shaw, who wrote, in a comment: <blockquote> I would further add that the votes Nader received  were equally divided between democrats and republicans and the bulk of their votes came from independents who probably would not have voted otherwise!</blockquote>

Okay, so, as an active Obama supporter in 2008, I have felt duped, played and betrayed. Now that gerrymandering and retirements have removed some of the best and last remaining Democrats in congress, I feel that congress offers next to no hope of seeing progressive visions being realized. To me, these elections are a distraction from the more important work of organizing activism, including civil disobedience-- as people like  Chris Hedges  have described and as the heroes of Occupy Wall Street have acted. 

Personally, I live in a swing state, which makes it much harder to decide. If I lived in either a solidly blue or red state, I'd definitely vote third party. But Pennsylvania is up for play. While I see Obama as one of the two corporate duopolist candidates, I also feel that handing the White House and the Supreme Court to the Republicans could cause irreversible, irreparable harm to the USA. So I haven't decided yet what I'll do. I like both Jill Stein and Rocky Anderson, but I also don't want Romney to be picking the next Supreme Court Justice. In my state, PA, the decision about voter ID has yet to get a final hearing at the state Supreme Court. That could be the deciding factor, but probably not, for me. If voter ID is allowed, then I believe PA will effectively become a red state, with 800,000 mostly Democratic voters disenfranchised. 

These are tough times with tough decisions to make. Calling people names for trying to do what they believe is right will only make matters worse. 

It IS time to think through, really thoroughly, what YOU will do. This is not just another election. That's for sure. But I do hope you consider your vote based on the current corporatist duopoly and whether you are in a solid red or blue, or swing state. 



Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind.  Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives  one person at a time was too slow, he founded Opednews.com-- which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big)  to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet and the Psychopathy Defense and Optimization Project. 

Rob Kall Wikipedia Page

Over 200 podcasts are archived for downloading here, or can be accessed from iTunes. Rob is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

Rob is, with Opednews.com the first media winner of the (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

Libertarian Legacy? Ron Paul's Campaign Manager, 49, Dies Uninsured, Of Pneumonia, Leaving family $400,000 Debt

John Kerry's Odd Symptoms-- Eyes and Tongue


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
37 people are discussing this page, with 61 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

This is a difficult discussion that really, REALLY... by Rob Kall on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 1:06:05 PM
Agree with: "Eliminating" money from politics... by BFalcon on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:45:29 AM
before, the votes are counted in secret on compute... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:42:40 PM
That's an excellent idea: Register as 3rd party re... by Jim Arnold on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:48:30 PM
...to Independent a few months ago and it feels go... by Randy Moor on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:24:48 PM
Can teach them some lesson, I agree.... by BFalcon on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 8:21:58 PM
I and a member of my progressive group met with ou... by Scott Baker on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 1:40:57 PM
I believe that a clear message needs to be sent to... by IceT on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 2:35:35 PM
As Rob wrote "handing the White House and the Supr... by Randy Moor on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:45:39 PM
We do NOT want Citizen's United overturned. We nee... by Lexi Mize on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 2:44:25 PM
29th Amendment Rational:Every vote every congre... by Lexi Mize on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 2:45:11 PM
The idea of term limits is based on the assumption... by Jim Arnold on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:37:10 AM
Media reform, effective safeguards against bribery... by PCM on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:59:23 PM
Great Rob, but you left out taking back ownership ... by Jay Janson on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 2:57:56 PM
about Obama supporters is their willingness to ove... by Lois Gagnon on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 3:03:49 PM
Oft quoted & sometimes credited to Mark Twain ... by mrk * on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 3:28:15 PM
Both are correct, Yo-Yo MeSome progressives say we... by Don Smith on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 3:31:43 PM
The premeditated ardor of Mr. Janson's for the peo... by Steve Shapiro on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 3:43:58 PM
I used to be the Director of Communications for th... by Charlotte Scot on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 5:26:12 PM
One of your emails made the following misstatement... by Janet Gaudiello on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 5:53:47 PM
how can we lose something that we already gave awa... by zon moy on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:07:32 AM
fraud, it does not matter how anyone votes.  ... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 6:06:56 PM
No reforms will work until the Corporate Overlords... by Ted Voth Jr on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 6:11:21 PM
if we are lucky, we can actually find a way to mak... by zon moy on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 11:07:44 AM
When a moral person is confronted by the dillema p... by Paul Repstock on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 6:39:08 PM
"NO" or "None of the Above" is not one of the ball... by IceT on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:32:52 PM
...but it should be!Some time ago I submitted an a... by Terry Adcock on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:45:55 PM
But, there is nothing written in stone which requi... by Paul Repstock on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:14:21 PM
I often wonder why TV political ads have to be pai... by john on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:38:15 PM
...and I agree. I believe the media comes from the... by Tommy Wright on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:01:41 PM
I agree with your proposed "six major efforts". As... by Van Crandall on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:43:49 PM
We seem to have a tendency to evaluate independent... by John Sanchez Jr. on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:28:15 AM
Rob, you suggest: "1-end the two party system... by E. J. N. on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:28:10 PM
I sincerely believe that there will have to be a "... by Deborah Dills on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:40:35 AM
The question is what kind of revolution?As The 21s... by E. J. N. on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:53:41 PM
IRV (also known as ranked choice voting -RCV) invo... by June Genis on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:38:15 AM
And the link.... by E. J. N. on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:39:21 PM
The link to getting your "Overturn Citizens United... by Deborah Dills on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:28:12 PM
I love John Taylor Gatto's book-Dumbing Us Down- ... by Deborah Dills on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:14:57 AM
This is a well-thought out piece.  The proble... by Kevin Anthony Stoda on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:24:50 AM
are using the pretense of preventing non-citizens ... by John Sanchez Jr. on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:18:32 AM
the GOP even had the gall to attempt last minute g... by Michael Shaw on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 9:47:05 AM
The fact that we are allowed to choose our dictato... by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:41:29 AM
you should tell us what alternatives you have in m... by John Sanchez Jr. on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:57:51 AM
..leads me to seek alternatives to the failed inst... by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:24:43 PM
The Anarchist Delusion http://www.opednews.com/a/... by Joe Giambrone on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:50:37 PM
The entire earth is a 'collateral damage zone' of ... by Ned Lud on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 8:23:00 AM
In your article you wrote: "The difference is inst... by Rudy Avizius on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 9:03:34 AM
"Do they not remember that voting for Nader in Flo... by Joe Giambrone on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:45:27 PM
It depends upon computer vote counts.  It is ... by Laura Stein on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:21:49 PM
Laura, as I believe you are a member of California... by June Genis on Monday, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:32:09 AM
What do you mean by "ballet images"?  Does ea... by Maxwell on Tuesday, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:05:25 PM
You must be talking about a single very local elec... by Laura Stein on Tuesday, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:43:04 PM
I don't think, in a nation of 300,000,000 people, ... by Maxwell on Tuesday, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:00:56 PM
Stanislevic, a top statistician, originally suppor... by Laura Stein on Tuesday, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:17:35 PM
There are just too many ways those hired to mainta... by Laura Stein on Tuesday, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:47:28 PM
Green Party Nominee Jill Stein & Running Mat... by Deborah Dills on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:28:33 PM
Vast Majority of ideas are excellent. Why haven... by Thomas Brown on Monday, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:05:35 AM
These ideas are excellent. But they are sol... by Thomas Brown on Monday, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:20:35 AM
1.  Mostly two parties is OK as long as there... by Maxwell on Monday, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:36:55 AM
BOTH major parties are controlled by, and serve, t... by Stephen Unger on Wednesday, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:53:33 PM