Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 7 (10 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   23 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The dissolving Constitution: The Enumerated Rights Are Hanging By A Thread

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 14   Valuable 7   Well Said 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 1/28/11

Become a Fan
  (385 fans)


While people in Tunisia and Egypt have taken to the streets in attempts to gain their liberty, Americans are losing their liberty with minimal protest. Even the American Civil Liberties Union seems unfocused. At a time when we are being surrounded by a police state and the federal judiciary is being taken over by the Federalist Society and unitary executive theory that places the president above the law, we need a heightened appreciation of civil liberty and the Constitution on the part of the American people. The American people need to come together and to take a united stand against the police state and unaccountable executive branch power.

During my many years of writing in defense of law as a shield of the people instead of a weapon in the hands of the state, I have identified two important reasons that Americans are losing the protection of the legal principles that made them free. One reason is that a significant portion of the population, especially among those who think of themselves as conservative, there is indifference and even hostility to civil liberties. The other reason is that Benthamite thinking has made inroads into the Blackstonian conception of law that is the basis of the Constitution. Jeremy Bentham argued for pre-emptive arrest before a crime is committed, for torture in order to obtain confession, and for subverting the attorney-client privilege. Bentham's views, fiercely hostile to those of our Founding Fathers, are now represented on the federal bench (federal appeals court judge Jay S. Bybee, for example) and in prestigious law schools (John Yoo, UC Berkeley, for example).

In chapter 3 of The Tyranny of Good Intentions, Larry Stratton and I contrast Bentham's views with those of William Blackstone and our Founding Fathers. This article is about the division of the American public on the matter of civil liberty.

Court decisions by "activist judges" in behalf of criminals, abortion, homosexual rights, and against school prayer, all in the name of constitutional rights and civil liberty, have resulted in many Americans identifying civil liberty with procedures that provide protections and immunities for criminals and with judicially created rights that are destroying morality. All the fights over Supreme Court appointments have to do with "social issues" such as abortion. The enumerated rights in the Constitution, such as habeas corpus, due process, free speech and association, long ago receded into the background and play scant role in Senate confirmations of Supreme Court appointees.

As a member of the ACLU, I look to that organization for the legal defense of our enumerated rights. The ACLU does stand up for the enumerated civil liberties spelled out in the Constitution. However, reading the current issue of the ACLU newsletter, I found myself wondering if the ACLU is unconsciously contributing to the public's indifference and hostility to civil liberty. The newsletter's list of legal highlights for 2010 presents the ACLU's activities as being concentrated in efforts to legalize homosexual marriage, to protect abortion from curbs, and to end the promotion of religious beliefs in public schools.

These are all issues that infuriate conservatives, and these are the issues that conservatives identify with civil liberties. Therefore, much of the public is not the least bit perturbed to hear that civil liberties are under attack when many understand civil liberties to consist of criminal rights, prayer bans, abortion, and homosexual marriage. This is dangerous, because in the public's mind, civil liberty can easily morph from  procedures that coddle criminals into procedures that coddle terrorists. Should this occur, all would be lost. Defense of the enumerated rights would become "giving aid and comfort to terrorists."

It is not my purpose to argue the validity of the ACLU's position on abortion and homosexual marriage. I am sure that the ACLU is convinced that homosexual and abortion rights are somewhere in the Constitution, but they are not enumerated rights, and the conservatives know it. When the Constitution and Bill of Rights were written, I don't know if abortion and homosexual acts were the statutory offenses that they were during much of my lifetime, but they were not socially approved behavior that the Founding Fathers thought worthy of Constitutional protection. The separation of church and state means no state church or taxpayer support. It does not mean no prayer in public schools. Ironic, isn't it, that today with faith-based initiatives we have taxpayers' money going to religious institutions, but no prayer in school.

When the issue is raised that perhaps the Constitution, like common law, can change as people's mores change, conservatives reply that if the Constitution can change, anything can be put into it or be taken out, such as the civil liberties that I am complaining about Bush taking out. As for abortion and gay marriage, these are things that conservatives think activist judges and the ACLU put into the Constitution. Strictures against abortion and homosexuals should have been overturned legislatively, not by inventive interpretations of the Constitution. 

The unintended consequence of the judicial branch exercising the legislative function in the name of Constitutional rights has been the alienation of a large percentage of the population from civil liberty concerns. Today much of the population views the ACLU as a threat to society comparable to terrorism. 

With the police state destroying protections against searches, the First Amendment, habeas corpus, due process, and the right to an attorney, with grand jury subpoenas issued to war protesters, with lists of American citizens to be assassinated, with ongoing war crimes committed in wars based in lies and deceptions, with the executive branch's seizure of the power to violate statutory laws against torture and spying without warrants, should the ACLU refocus, stop alienating conservatives, and bring the people together against the police state?

Should the ACLU be devoting its scarce resources to convincing courts to legalize homosexual marriage when the executive branch can declare people to be suspects and throw them into a dungeon? Reproductive rights and homosexual marriage will not stop people from being thrown into dungeons. If the enumerated rights are lost, no other rights are meaningful.

Dr. Roberts is coauthor with Lawrence Stratton of The Tyranny of Good Intentions, a book that documents the erosion of the legal principles that protect liberty.

 

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/

Dr. Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury for Economic Policy in the Reagan Administration. He was associate editor and columnist with the Wall Street Journal, columnist for Business Week and the Scripps Howard News Service. He is a contributing editor to Gerald Celente's Trends Journal. He has had numerous university appointments. His book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is available here. His latest book,  How America Was Lost, has just been released and can be ordered here.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Libya - The DC/NATO Agenda And The Next Great War

The Road to Armageddon

American Job Loss Is Permanent

A Story...The Last Whistleblower

Pakistan TV Report Contradicts US Claim of Bin Laden's Death

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 people are discussing this page, with 23 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

PCR's analysis of the ALCU problem of focusing on ... by Lewis Yang on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:06:25 AM
I't not a question of homosexual legitimation, but... by Timothy Gatto on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:15:24 AM
CONservatives do seem to be a self-righteous lot w... by Donald on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:38:33 AM
Thanks for another excellent article.... by Donald on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:40:31 AM
Well researched, well written, concise, I love you... by Steven G. Erickson on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:16:50 AM
long ago, it was taken over, and now, it is part o... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:40:59 AM
it was working to preserve our civil rights while ... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:48:51 AM
I don't have a criminal record but in 2005, I was ... by Kay Sieverding on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:03:21 AM
Perhaps it would help YOU, US to tell us who USMS ... by Yes on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:40:23 AM
I am intrigued by your posting. I have recently su... by manifesto 2000 on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:25:29 PM
US MARSHALL SERVICE... by sherry clark on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:43:03 PM
Don't feel so bad about the ACLU. With the "conse... by Herb Ruhs on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:21:11 AM
realized that we vastly outnumber the rulers and t... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:39:58 AM
I cannot agree with the basic premise of this. For... by Mike Cormany on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:48:35 AM
stolen? It was here, but it said nothing. Where ... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:28:54 PM
pretended that the ACLU was doing the best that it... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:04:34 PM
Hi Mark, I've always enjoyed your writing. I've be... by Elizabeth Hanson on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:22:20 PM
I don't think it's that Dr. Roberts is unconcerned... by sherry clark on Saturday, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:05:09 AM
Independent thinking is rare on blogs. Keep it u... by Al Rodbell on Saturday, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:38:25 AM
Is larceny the root problem?..Stolen oil, stolen ... by Yes on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:25:15 AM
"The separation of church and state means no state... by Mike Budd on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:11:41 PM
The 10 Commandments, and as Jesus has put 2 other ... by Debbie S on Friday, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:38:44 PM
There is no Constitution, our federal courts fre... by Beverly Prather on Monday, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:19:59 PM