Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   9 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Real Lessons of Pearl Harbor, Part 2

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (7 fans)

Part 2:   Economic Pressure and a Vulnerable Naval Base

In Part 1, we learned that Americans became disillusioned after World War I, and opposed entering the new European war.   However, President Franklin D. Roosevelt intended to provoke an attack by the Axis powers to change public opinion and convince America to enter the war on the side of Britain and France.



1942 propaganda poster by Wikimedia Commons

Meanwhile, President Roosevelt was having far more success in his efforts to increase military spending.   A contributing factor was the lingering economic depression, and the popularity of Keynesian economic theories.   According to the British economist John Maynard Keynes, any government spending - even spending that diverts resources away from production of consumer goods and capital goods - contributes to economic growth.   The logical conclusion of this theory is that any government spending, including military spending, stimulates the economy.   Other economists (such as Henry Hazlitt) criticized this theory as merely a variation of the broken-window fallacy.    However, the idea that military spending contributes to economic growth is still with us to this day.   As a result, some Congressmen who opposed intervention in foreign wars may have been willing to increase military spending anyway.   Admiral Theobald describes the intense American military buildup:

On September 3, 1940, the United States obtained long-term leases to outlying bases in British territory, in exchange for 50 old destroyers.   On September 16, the Selective Service Act became law.   By the end of 1940, Congress had voted: an immediate increase of the Army to 1,000,000 enlisted men, with an eventual goal of 4,000,000; 50,000 planes for the Army Air Corps; 170,000 enlisted men for the Navy, and 34,000 for the Marines; 15,000 planes and 10,000 pilots for the Naval Air Force; and a naval building program which envisaged an eventual two-ocean navy and embraced 17 battleships, 14 heavy cruisers, 40 light cruisers, 197 destroyers and 74 submarines.

Continuing his efforts, the President, on December 29, 1940, made a radio plea to the country for support for further large increases in the Army and Navy; and the budget submitted in January, 1941, recommended the then tremendous peacetime appropriation of $10,811,000,000 for the military and naval establishments.

But despite some low-level conflict with German submarines, FDR had failed to provoke Germany into an attack. As George Victor wrote in The Pearl Harbor Myth: Rethinking the Unthinkable, "He seems to have concluded - correctly as it turned out - that Japan would be easier to provoke into a major attack on the United States than Germany would.   As Secretary of War Henry Stimson later told a Congressional investigation, 

In spite of the risk involved... in letting the Japanese fire the first shot, we realized that in order to have the full support of the American people it was desirable to make sure that the Japanese be the ones to do this so there should remain no doubt in anyone's mind as to who were the aggressors.

Also, Stimson met with President Roosevelt, Secretary of State Cordell Hull, Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox, General George Marshall, and Admiral Harold Stark, the Chief of Naval Operations, on November 25, 1941.   At this meeting, Secretary Hull remarked that the Japanese might attack at any time.   Later that day, Secretary Stimson wrote in his diary, "The question was how we should maneuver them into the position of firing the first shot without allowing too much danger to ourselves."

By then, Japan had been subjected to intense diplomatic pressure and economic sanctions.   These sanctions included ending exports of aviation fuels and lubricants to Japan under the Export Control Act, scrap iron and steel, and oil.   Roosevelt also froze all Japanese assets in the United States.   The diplomatic pressure exerted on Japan is described in Charles Callan Tansill's book, Back Door to War; Roosevelt Foreign Policy 1933 - 1941 and in William L. Neumann's essay, "How American Policy Toward Japan Contributed to War in the Pacific" in Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, edited by Harry Elmer Barnes.

According to George Victor:

Expecting to lose a war with the United States - and lose it disastrously - Japan's leaders had tried with growing desperation to negotiate.   On this point, most historians have long agreed.   Meanwhile, evidence has come out that Roosevelt and Hull persistently refused to negotiate....   It was after learning of Japan's decision to go to war with the United States if the talks "break down" that Roosevelt decided to break them off.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt baited his trap by moving the Pacific Fleet's base from San Diego, California, to Pearl Harbor in April, 1940.   The Commander in Chief of the Pacific Fleet, Admiral James Richardson, objected to the move because in his opinion it left the fleet vulnerable to enemy attack.   Roosevelt removed Richardson from command and replaced him with Admiral Husband Kimmel, who commanded the fleet at the time of the Japanese attack.   General Walter Short was also placed in command of the island's shore defenses, including the harbor.   During the attack, Admiral Robert "Fuzzy" Theobald, author of The Final Secret of Pearl Harbor, was in command of the Pacific Fleet's destroyers.



Photo of the attack on Pearl Harbor from a Japanese aircraft. by U.S. Navy/Wikimedia Commons

Pearl Harbor is a relatively shallow harbor, and the aerial torpedoes with which American military leaders were familiar would have become stuck in the mud before rising to the surface and hitting their targets.   Roosevelt (who had served as Assistant Secretary of the Navy under Woodrow Wilson) and his staff were not aware that Japan had developed new torpedoes that would be effective in the shallow waters of Pearl Harbor.   Therefore, it is likely that they underestimated the damage an aircraft carrier-based attack could cause.

However, U.S. Army Colonel Billy Mitchell had proved that battleships were vulnerable to aerial attack as early as February, 1921.   And in war games in 1932, Admiral Harry Yarnell had proved that Pearl Harbor itself was vulnerable to a carrier-based naval attack, even without Japan's shallow-depth torpedoes.   So, it requires a leap of faith to conclude that Roosevelt and his advisors really thought that Admiral Richardson's objections to basing the fleet at Pearl Harbor were unfounded.   After all, Pearl Harbor was located in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, thousands of miles from the mainland ports of San Diego and San Francisco.   And yet, that is exactly what the apologists for Roosevelt's strategy would have us believe.

Roosevelt's attempt to provoke a Japanese attack proved effective.   In his essay, "Japanese-American Relations, 1921 - 1941; The Pacific Back Road to War" in Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, Charles Callan Tansill quotes Captain Oliver Lyttleton, the British Minister of Supplies, saying

America provoked Japan to such an extent that the Japanese were forced to attack Pearl Harbor.   It is a travesty on history to say that America was forced into war.

Or, as Admiral Theobald put it,

Diplomatically, President Roosevelt's strategy of forcing Japan to war by unremitting and ever-increasing diplomatic-economic pressure, and by simultaneously holding our Fleet in Hawaii as an invitation to a surprise attack, was a complete success.

Prior to the Japanese attack, Roosevelt deliberately withheld information from Admiral Kimmel and General Short, which would have warned them that an attack was imminent.   In fact, both men were intentionally kept ignorant of events leading up to the attack, and then used as scapegoats afterward.   Roosevelt and his staff appear to have been concerned that Admiral Kimmel could have stopped the Japanese attack by merely sailing the fleet out of the harbor, if he knew it was imminent.   They may have also been concerned that the public would expect Roosevelt to resolve the conflict through diplomacy, if the attack were repulsed too easily.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Alan Pyeatt is an award-winning Civil Engineer who lives in Monrovia, California. He also enjoys music, organic gardening, economics, and audio/video production.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Look at Libertarian Party Nominees Gary Johnson, Jim Gray

Will Obama Support Internet Freedom in his Second Term?

The Real Lessons of Pearl Harbor

Happy Bill of Rights Day, America

The Real Lessons of Pearl Harbor, Part 2

Are Sin Taxes an Example of the Tyranny of the Majority?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

As Harry Elmer Barnes wrote in Perpetual War for P... by Alan Pyeatt on Friday, Dec 28, 2012 at 6:54:04 PM
When I finished the first part of Gar Alperovitz's... by Gentry L Rowsey on Sunday, Dec 30, 2012 at 5:24:57 AM
I meant StiMson.... by Gentry L Rowsey on Sunday, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:43:40 AM
I first heard about Eisenhower saying the bomb was... by Alan Pyeatt on Monday, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:11:14 AM
It is well known to economic historians that war s... by Derryl Hermanutz on Sunday, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:18:10 PM
I agree that you can't really understand history w... by Alan Pyeatt on Monday, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:32:02 AM
Omitted however, is the most "mechanical" part of ... by Gentry L Rowsey on Monday, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:10:10 AM
...that the Japanese interpreted the fleet's move ... by Darren Wolfe on Monday, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:29:57 AM
You can't really blame the Japanese for that inter... by Alan Pyeatt on Monday, Dec 31, 2012 at 5:53:17 PM