Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
22 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Dance of Consent

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Well Said 3   Inspiring 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 6/28/13
Become a Fan
  (13 fans)

opednews.com

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/95413346@N00/8346790480/: 91.SilentMarch.WitnessAgainstTorture.WDC.7January2012
91.SilentMarch.WitnessAgainstTorture.WDC.7January2012 by Elvert Barnes
Consent is a slippery thing. If you look inside, there's a little ball of trust. When you give your consent about something to a person, company or government, you are entrusting a portion of your power to them, with the unspoken understanding that they will honor that trust. Unfortunately, it doesn't always turn out that way.

I'm currently working on the 7th and final installment of a series of short stories that I began last year which explores the idea that any time you refrain from speaking out against an insult or injustice, the perpetrator gains a little confidence, and you lose it. (You can read these and my other stories here at OEN or on my WordPress blog.) By not speaking out, you consent to the perpetrator's actions, empowering them to go further the next time. This is the essence of how the world has come to be the way it is. Give them an inch, and they'll take a mile.

Anyone who has ever worked on a poorly controlled fixed-price project is aware of mission creep. You start off confident that you can accomplish what you had agreed to do in the time allotted, and within the budget that had been agreed to. But somewhere along the way, you're asked to do one small thing beyond the scope of the plan, and you accede to the request without renegotiating the cost of the work. You consent to the change because you trust your customer to honor the original agreement. You tell yourself that it's just one small thing, and let it go at that. But the damage has already been done. Your trust has already been violated. And because you have agreed to it, your customer becomes that much more confident that they can ask for another change, and then another, and another. Meanwhile, you have been diminished. Your own confidence has eroded, and you are less likely to object to their next request, simply because you had agreed to this one.

The art of negotiating is a dance of consent. In theory, each party attempts to get the other to consent to something beyond what they had initially agreed to, in exchange for ceding something else. In practice, however, one side often comes to the dance floor with more power than the other, and the dance becomes an assault. This is why negotiating with a company or a government is frequently a lost cause. They have more power than you do, and are confident that you will consent to a bad deal. But they got that power from us, and they can only keep it if we allow them to.

You can start by recognizing all of the ways in which you have ceded power to others, because they were each accomplished by getting your consent, and it's not always done consciously. For example, if you've ever created an account for using a website such as OEN, you have to agree to the terms of a contract that you are unlikely to ever read. If you trust that the people behind the site, like Rob Kall at OEN, will honor the trust that you have placed in his creation, then it's no big deal. But how many websites have you registered at where you don't know the intentions of the owners? You may get angry when you learn that a site turns around and sells information about you to other companies, but you consented to it blindly. And when they later ask for your consent to changes to that agreement, you blithely click your consent, without knowing what else you have agreed to.

But companies are not the only powerful entities that are collecting and using information about you. And that's where Edward Snowden drew the line, when he learned that the US government was violating the trust of its citizens by spying on them. Such spying was itself a violation of the contract that the citizens have with their government, the Constitution upon which that government was based. You're even being taken advantage of by the way it has been described by the government and parroted by the complicit media. Sure we were spying on you, they say, but we're only using 'metadata' -- the record of who you called, emailed and texted, and not the content of those messages. But the truth is that there's more value in knowing the network of connections that this metadata creates than there is in the written or spoken conversations themselves, because the network map tells them who the influential people are, and which ones are likely to cause trouble by spreading dissent. They're relying on your ignorance to protect their power over you.

Whistleblowers, such as Daniel Ellsberg, Bradley Manning, and now Edward Snowden, took huge personal risks to lift the curtain of secrecy and reveal the ways in which the US government had violated our trust, the law and the constitution through power that had been  taken without consent. Such revelations threaten to undermine the government's illusion of power over us that keeps the citizens from revolting. To protect that illusion, the government, and the corporations that control what it does, attack not only the whistleblowers themselves, but journalists, such as Glenn Greenwald, who have the integrity to serve the people rather than those in power.

So we find ourselves beset by a two-headed monster. On one side, there's the Government. It has betrayed our trust, against the best efforts of the few, such as Senator Bernie Sanders and Congressman Alan Grayson, who have railed on our behalf. And on the other side are a group of multinational corporations, controlled by a small number of obscenely wealthy people, who are doing their best to extract whatever is to be had from us. It's been said that communication is only possible among equals. Governments negotiate with other governments, and corporations negotiate with other corporations, but now the two factions are dissolving into one another. Michigan's state government has turned control of some cities over to corporate masters, voiding the citizens' relationship with their elected city governments, and nullifying the guarantees of the Constitution. And ALEC has been dictating what becomes law, pushing corporate rule further and further into the lives of the people.

It's all a nice fantasy for those in government and business who dream of power, but it can't last. It's not sustainable. It makes faulty assumptions about the basis for all of that accreted power. Every one of us is living through a grand narrative in which the powerful have reached the limits of power, and the world is being transformed. Rob Kall talks about it all the time: bottom-up power. Howard Zinn showed us that history is made by the small acts of multitudes, rather than the stories of powerful individuals we are force-fed in school.

And sometimes, those small acts of multitudes are inspired by someone who doesn't even rise to speak, but instead plants subversive thoughts in the minds of their readers. A recent example is the book and movie, "Cloud Atlas", which showed how we are all connected, not simply across distance, but across time as well. As the author, David Mitchell, said through his character Sonmi, "Our lives are not our own. We are bound to others, past and present, and by each crime and every kindness, we birth our future."

For us, though, the question is how do we do it. What small act can I do that will resonate with the multitudes to transform the world? The idea of speaking truth to power sounds fine, but what truth, and to whom do I speak it?

In 1951, Eric Frank Russell published a short story called "And Then There Were None". His story was about a space expedition from Earth that encountered a world that had been settled a long time earlier by a community that did not accept the need for centralized power. It had developed customs and traditions from that, which included the idea of exchanging 'obs' or obligations with one another in exchange for helping one another out. The expedition didn't understand how a society without powerful leaders to control it could exist, and sent out one man to find out more. Time and again, people referred him to a simple sign that read 'FIW', and told him is was the ultimate weapon. Against it, no power could prevail. Any time the leader of the expedition attempted to force the people to do something, they stood fast, refused to comply, and said, "FIW". That one man eventually discovered the secret, and joined the people's opposition to the expedition's attempt at control. Then, one by one, the rest of the expedition followed suit, until there was nobody left to claim power over them.

Russell's secret was wrapped up in a simple phrase: Freedom - I Won't. In other words, Freedom is the ability to stand before such power and declare 'I Won't' consent. Spread the word. FIW!

--- P. Orin Zack

 

Ever since I learned to speak binary on a DIGIAC 3080 training computer, I've been involved with tech in one way or another, but there was always another part of me off exploring ideas and writing about them. Halfway to a BS in Space Technology at (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Short Story: "Terrifying Vindication"

Short Story: "Forced Inquiry"

Short Story: "Health Care Reform"

First Followers; and Tiptoe-Caused-Avalanches of Change

Short Story: "Peace Initiative" (2nd in a series)

Short Story: "Logical Conclusion/Full Circle" (parts 1&2 of a series)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Elsewhere in Cloud Atlas, another character was in... by Philip Zack on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:15:53 AM
Perhaps it can. Or perhaps not-- it takes a lot to... by Rob Kall on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:51:58 AM
If we behave honestly on an individual level, it n... by Paul Repstock on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:02:41 PM
...to refuse my Social Security payments. Guilty a... by Daniel Penisten on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:35:28 PM
Social Security is money that we pay into the fund... by Philip Zack on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 2:19:37 PM
but the people have always satisfied themselves wi... by David Chester on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:00:40 AM
Participating in a bus boycott is one small thing,... by Philip Zack on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:06:41 AM
we should all remember. The ocean is great because... by Daniel Geery on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:21:36 AM
and severely damaged its ability to resurrect itse... by Doc McCoy on Saturday, Jun 29, 2013 at 2:32:44 AM
When considering what OWS accomplished, if you foc... by Philip Zack on Saturday, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:02:47 AM
The momentum did not continue.  The majority ... by Doc McCoy on Saturday, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:43:04 AM
does not exist. Power is always from the top. Let'... by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Jun 29, 2013 at 8:29:38 AM
"Americans are, at best, lethargic.  They lo... by Daniel Geery on Saturday, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:31:02 PM
It appears there have been many cultures without c... by Daniel Geery on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:20:00 AM
Thanks.The narrative that human nature has always ... by Philip Zack on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:56:06 AM
"Disconnecting from corporations", will probably r... by Paul Repstock on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:09:56 PM
You nail the essence of how we can respond to the ... by Paul Repstock on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:18:55 PM
It  is not enough to refuse. You need  t... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 2:25:35 PM
The first step in embarking on a search for what y... by Philip Zack on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:19:50 PM
but I think we all had gone through the phase 1. O... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:35:02 PM
Resistance is not easy, but it is not as fraught w... by John Rachel on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:48:38 PM
good video in the same theme Chris Hayes Absolute... by Textynn N on Friday, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:04:35 PM