Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Tell Me Again, Who Can't Film on Federal Property?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (10 fans)
- Advertisement -
Many times liberty activists handing out information for the Fully Informed Jury Association have been told that they can't film on federal property by the US Marshals and other law enforcement officers at the US District courthouse in lower Manhattan, New York City. Here are some examples of this federal anti-liberty behavior:

In Philadelphia, PA there have been attempts to shut down filming of the pamphleteering too:

- Advertisement -

Allentown, PA is where the worst incident happened. The US Marshals actually arrested and charged George Donnelly. I'd show you the video but the feds kept it. (I wonder what they're hiding.)

Things sure are different at the US District courthouse at 500 Pearl St in NYC when they want the public to see a juicy criminal coming or going. There was plenty of filming when con artist extraordinaire Bernard Madoff was there:

When Faisal Shahzad, the suspect in the failed Times Square bombing plot, was there there were many cameras rolling:

Look at all those cameras on the courthouse property in the last two videos. Isn't it interesting how the federal government is happy to allow filming there when they want coverage? When liberty activists show up, handing out jury nullification information, suddenly, there's no filming allowed.

This is clearly a case of the federal agents wanting to shut down activists handing out information they don't want people to know about. They also may not want us filming Julian Heicklen's arrests in case something goes wrong we won't have evidence of their abuse. Additionally, they may realize that they look pretty thuggish busting Julian for pamphleteering. Whatever their reasons this double standard has got to stop. Liberty activists have the same rights as the main stream media to cover events happening at this courthouse. The next time a US Marshal says "no filming on federal property" we'll all know he's lying. Even Department of Homeland Security policy allows filming of federal buildings. Let the cameras roll!

I invite readers to put links in the comments section to other examples of filming on federal property. Thank you.

Darren Wolfe, otherwise known as The International Libertarian, is the former Eastern Vice Chair of the Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania. He grew up in Puerto Rico and lived in Venezuela for seven years, including the first year of Chavez' rule. (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Judicial Crackdown on Jury Rights Activists in Florida

The Evil Lincoln

Boycott Philly? Why Philadelphia's Licensing and Taxing of Blogs is Creeping Fascism

POLICE STATE 2010: Philly Cops Stopping & Searching Random People On The Street; Over 250,000 So Far


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

is entirely legal under the Constitution (remember... by John Shriver on Tuesday, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:35:19 PM
John,Thx for the comment. If they had any understa... by Darren Wolfe on Tuesday, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:03:56 PM
Since the Patirot Act was enacted, now anyone is d... by Stanimal on Wednesday, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:00:37 AM