Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Ten years to control Climate Change...or not.

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (9 fans)
If you run a car in a garage with a person inside, death is certain in a few hours.

If this person were in a larger enclosed space with several buses running, it might take a few months, but eventually death is equally certain.

Now take 6 billion people on Earth with 200 million cars, 5,000 aircraft and 2,000 coal-fired power plants running 24/7 in a 30 mile deep atmosphere and of course it will take years, but as surely as in the garage, at some point large numbers of people will die.

Not one molecule of CO2 can escape our environment and we have no garage door to open.

We are putting at least 60+ billion pounds of CO2 into the atmosphere daily!

If climate disasters are to be averted, atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) must be reduced below the levels that already exist today…    PhysOrg.com

Carbon dioxide content in fresh air varies between 0.03% (300 ppm) and 0.06% (600 ppm), depending on the location.  Concentrations higher than 1,000 ppm will cause discomfort in more than 20% of people, and their discomfort will increase with increasing CO2 concentration. At 2,000 ppm the majority of people will feel a significant degree of discomfort, and many will develop nausea and headaches.

…To maintain a planet similar to that on which civilization developed, an optimum CO2 level would be less than 350 ppm — a dramatic change from most previous studies, which suggested a danger level for CO2 is likely to be 450 ppm or higher. Atmospheric CO2 is currently 385 parts per million (ppm) and is increasing by about 2 ppm each year from the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil, and gas) and from the burning of forests.

“Out of sight, out of mind,” is a pithy saying that aptly sums up the attitude most industrialized countries have toward ocean acidification. While there has been much (justified) hand-wringing about the terrestrial impacts of climate change, policymakers have largely ignored the threats posed by acidic seas – which are considerable.

There is about 50 times as much carbon dissolved in the oceans in the form of CO2 and CO2 hydration products as exists in the atmosphere. The oceans act as an enormous carbon sink, having "absorbed about one-third of all human-generated CO2 emissions to date." Generally, gas solubility decreases as water temperature increases. Accordingly, carbon dioxide is released from ocean water into the atmosphere as ocean temperatures rise.

The oceans have long buffered the effects of climate change by absorbing a substantial portion of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide. But this benefit has a catch: as the gas dissolves, it makes seawater more acidic. Now an international panel of marine scientists says this acidity is accelerating so fast it threatens the survival of coral reefs, shellfish and the marine food web generally.  NY Times Jan 30, 2009

If we don't dramatically reduce our CO2 emissions, somewhere in the near future catastrophic failure of our eco system is inevitable.

The vast majority of world scientists agree the window is short to prevent disaster. We may have only 6 to 10 years - as the UN Intergovernmental Commission on Climate Change told U.S. Senators. "We're toast if we don't get on a very different path," James Hansen, Director of the Goddard Institute of Space Sciences, told The Associated Press.

"This is the last chance. Human life, the planet itself, is at a critical juncture. How we respond, and how quickly, matters.”



Mark Goldes is Founder and CEO of AESOP Institute in Sebastopol, CA. He is also Co-founder of Chava Energy and Chairman of Magnetic Power Inc. (MPI). Chava is acquiring assets of MPI. Earlier, he founded SunWind Ltd. He previously was CEO of a (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)



Hydrinos: One Barrel of Water can Equal 1,000 Barrels of Oil!


Will Future Cars Pay for Themselves as Power Plants?

The most dangerous "cliff": A fuel pool hanging 100 feet above the ground in Fukushima!


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I doubt it.I no longer own a car and consume less ... by Stanimal on Wednesday, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:02:07 AM
First is the MagGen that will replace batteries in... by Mark Goldes on Wednesday, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:45:24 AM
  As desirable as producing less CO2 emission... by Richard Lee on Wednesday, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:23:07 PM
Now that Exxon-Mobile has admitted paying scientis... by Mark Goldes on Wednesday, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:02:44 PM
While you may not be able to eliminate politics fr... by Richard Lee on Wednesday, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:23:27 PM
Using other data to access the human contribution ... by Richard Lee on Wednesday, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:09:25 PM