Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
23 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Supreme Court Might Decide Their Second Election

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Well Said 2   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 3/29/12
Become a Fan
  (37 fans)

opednews.com

It was a similar crew of conservative justices on the Supreme Court that decided that their long-held beliefs on states' rights were irrelevant and made George W. Bush our next president in 2000. Now, they're back!!! And they might decide yet another presidential election.

It was a similar crew of conservative justices on the Supreme Court that decided that their long-held beliefs on states' rights were irrelevant and made George W. Bush our next president in 2000. Now, they're back!!! And they might decide yet another presidential election.

Imagine the damage it does to President Obama to strip him of his signature accomplishment right before the election. It would also allow the Republicans to say -- "See, we told you so! It was unconstitutional all along. It was a wild, socialist over-reach of big government." It creates a permanent stain on the law -- as if there was something horribly wrong with it all along. And it takes it off the books at a moment when it is still relatively unpopular. So, before any of the popular provisions are put into effect it would go in the record books as a complete disaster.

Why don't you just hand the Republicans the election? Which is, of course, exactly what the conservatives of this court would love to do. These conservative justices are given far too much deference in the media. They are largely partisan hacks.

Antonin Scalia is a complete fraud. He will bend any so-called principle to get to the political result he wants. If it's upholding anti-gay legislation or striking down federal laws he doesn't like, he is a huge advocate for states' rights. But if it's marijuana legalization or euthanasia or Bush v. Gore, then he hates states' rights. So, which one is it? Here's how you can tell -- which side is the Republican Party on?

Remember, this is a guy who goes duck hunting with Dick Cheney and attends political fundraisers with the Koch brothers. Of course, he doesn't recuse himself from any cases that involve those people. In fact, he votes on their side nearly 100% of the time.

We've been hearing for at least thirty years about the dangers of activist judges. That it is so wrong for unelected officials, like judges, to invalidate laws made by the people's representatives. Now, all of a sudden, the Republicans love that idea! They want to interpret the Commerce Clause in a way that it has not been interpreted since 1937. They want to invalidate a sitting president's signature piece of legislation for the first time in 75 years. And their hack, partisan justices on the Supreme Court can't wait to do their bidding.

The way Scalia, Alito and Thomas are going to vote is certain. There isn't a single Republican position those guys haven't wanted to fondle. They will enthusiastically wrap their legs around the idea that the mandate is unconstitutional. And they will double down by saying it strikes down the rest of the law with it.

John Roberts plays a moderate on TV, so there is some questions about which way he'll go. But in the real world, he always votes with the conservatives because... he is deeply conservative (or more accurately, party line Republican, no matter where the so-called conservative position lies).

So, that leaves us with Justice Kennedy, who is a genuine swing vote. But remember he is the one that swung toward Bush and meddled with how Florida counts its votes despite decades of empty talk about states' rights. If he sides with the rest of the conservative justices, he will forever cement his place on the Hack Hall of Fame as one of the most deeply partisan justices we have ever had. If he helped to decide two presidential elections based on which party he likes rather than his so-called deeply held beliefs, like his oft-repeated deference to precedent, than it would be hard to find a more political and disingenuous justice.

One last thought, which is on the sad incompetence of the Democratic Party. They should be screaming "activist judges" from the rooftops. Instead they are meekly mumbling about how it's unclear which way the court is going to go and how we shouldn't pre-judge. I got news for you -- the Republicans have been pre-judging your bill for years now. You should consider fighting back.

But the primary responsibility is the president's. Why did you agree to the Republican idea of mandates in the first place?

Orrin Hatch (R-UT) was the original sponsor of the mandate in the Senate back in 1993. The Heritage Foundation championed the idea. Mitt Romney was applauded wildly by conservatives when he passed a mandate in Massachusetts. Did the president think they would like him more if he agreed to their idea? No, they have always opposed you at every turn, and they always will. They turned on their own idea the minute you agreed to it -- and now they're using it to kill your whole bill.

When is the president ever going to learn that agreeing with Republicans never helps him? It never helps the country. All it does is make it easier for them to beat you because you made the fatal mistake of agreeing with them.

 

Cenk Uygur is host of The Young Turks, the first ever live, daily web television talk show. The Young Turks are on XM Satellite Radio 8-9PM ET (XM 167, America Left) and on Sirius Left 146. The Young Turks is one of the Top 100 You Tube Partners, with over 18 million views a month on (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Fox News Comes Out of the Closet

Glenn Beck's Horrific Lie

Where Are the Tea Party Protests About Wall Street?

How the Rich Conduct Class Warfare

Who is More Conservative: Ronald Reagan or Barack Obama?

Is Barack Obama Stupid?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 23 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

It is a terrible law that hopefully the Supreme Co... by sbaker on Thursday, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:05:38 AM
I think this is a bad law too and hope it will be ... by Patricia Gray on Thursday, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:30:55 PM
Will pay?... by BFalcon on Thursday, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:47:08 PM
Kagan admitted that this is a subsidy. (We went to... by Miriam Callaghan on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:35:20 PM
to president Obama, which I thought was much bette... by BFalcon on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:34:56 PM
If the mandate is stripped it essentially guts the... by James Mc Shane on Thursday, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:14:07 AM
The idea that the Commerce Clause, intended to all... by Techknowledgie on Thursday, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:21:18 AM
cited the Commerce Clause in Gonzalez v. Raich to ... by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:59:22 PM
Cenk Uygur wrote:It was a similar crew of conserva... by Phil Weingart on Thursday, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:29:53 AM
why is it that Antonin Scalia said that the decisi... by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:33:16 PM
Mr. Sanchez seems to have appointed himself the au... by Phil Weingart on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:02:10 PM
that prompts my rebuttals. It has a great deal to ... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:19:33 PM
Good to hear the truth after all these years. ... by Patricia Gray on Thursday, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:36:23 PM
Isn't Scalia the one who asked whether he was expe... by Dennis Kaiser on Thursday, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:56:23 AM
and better informed in the ways of political event... by Bill Dugan on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:15:25 AM
And yet we still have to hear "get over it".... is... by Dennis Kaiser on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:36:40 AM
Seven - Two An unheard of result when talking abou... by sbaker on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:29:02 AM
It was the felonious five who said the people do n... by Dennis Kaiser on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:03:12 AM
Bush got one hundred percent of the African Americ... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:13:24 AM
...where you don't know the facts.The vote on cert... by Phil Weingart on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:16:09 PM
... the ballot punch found in the back seat of a D... by Phil Weingart on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:32:58 PM
which is the Republican method of choice for steal... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:26:21 PM
...the Democratic Party...should be screaming "a... by Joe Steel on Sunday, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:16:42 AM