Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
39 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Supreme Court Likely to Endorse Obama's War on Whistle-Blowers

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 8   Well Said 6   Supported 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 3/12/12

Become a Fan
  (342 fans)

opednews.com

This article cross-posted from Truthdig

Totalitarian systems dis-empower an unsuspecting population by gradually making legal what was once illegal. They incrementally corrupt and distort law to exclusively serve the goals of the inner sanctums of power and strip protection from the citizen. Law soon becomes the primary tool to advance the crimes of the elite and punish those who tell the truth. The state saturates the airwaves with official propaganda to replace news. Fear, and finally terror, creates an intellectual and moral void.

We have very little space left to maneuver. The iron doors of the corporate state are slamming shut. And a conviction of Bradley Manning, or any of the five others charged by the Obama administration under the Espionage Act of 1917 with passing government secrets to the press, would effectively terminate public knowledge of the internal workings of the corporate state. What we live under cannot be called democracy. What we will live under if the Supreme Court upholds the use of the Espionage Act to punish those who expose war crimes and state lies will be a species of corporate fascism. And this closed society is, perhaps, only a few weeks or months away.

Few other Americans are as acutely aware of our descent into corporate totalitarianism as Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon Papers in 1971 to The New York Times and is one of Manning's most ardent and vocal defenders. Ellsberg, who was charged under the Espionage Act, faced 12 felony counts and a possible sentence of 115 years. He says that if he provided the Pentagon Papers today to news organizations, he would most likely never see his case dismissed on grounds of government misconduct against him as it was in 1973. The government tactics employed to discredit Ellsberg, which included burglarizing his psychoanalyst's office and illegal wiretaps, were subjects of the impeachment hearings against President Richard Nixon. But that was then.

"Everything that Richard Nixon did to me, for which he faced impeachment and prosecution, which led to his resignation, is now legal under the Patriot Act, the FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] amendment act, the National Defense Authorization Act," Ellsberg told me late Friday afternoon when we met in Princeton, N.J.

Manning, whose trial is likely to begin in early August, is being held in a medium-security facility at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. He allegedly gave WikiLeaks more than 700,000 documents and video clips. One clip showed the 2007 Apache helicopter attack in which U.S. military personnel killed more than a dozen people in the Iraqi suburb of New Baghdad, including a Reuters news photographer and his driver. Manning faces 22 charges under the Espionage Act, including aiding the enemy, wrongfully causing intelligence to be published on the Internet, theft of public property or records, transmitting defense information, and fraud and related activity in connection with computers. If he is found guilty he could spend the rest of his life in prison without the possibility of parole. Juan Ernesto Mendez, the U.N. torture rapporteur, has described Manning's treatment by the U.S. government as "cruel, inhuman and degrading," especially "the excessive and prolonged isolation he was put in during the eight months he was in Quantico."

The Espionage Act was used only three times before President Barack Obama took office. Ellsberg's case was dismissed. The second use of the act saw Alfred Zehe, a German physicist, plead guilty to giving U.S. information to East Germany. The third case saw Samuel Morison, a one-time U.S. intelligence professional, convicted in federal court on two counts of espionage and two counts of theft of government property. He was sentenced to two years in prison on Dec. 4, 1985, for giving classified information to the press, and in 1988 the Supreme Court declined to hear his appeal. President Bill Clinton pardoned Morison on the last day of his presidency.

Obama, who serves the interests of the surveillance and security state with even more fervor than did George W. Bush, has used the Espionage Act to charge suspected leakers six times since he took office. The latest to be charged by the Obama administration under the act is John Kiriakou, a former CIA officer accused of disclosing classified information to journalists about the interrogation of Abu Zubaydah, an al-Qaida suspect. Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, which published the cables and video clips allegedly provided by Manning, is expected to be the seventh charged under the act.

The Supreme Court has yet to hear a case involving the Espionage Act. But one of these six cases will probably soon reach the court. If it, as expected, rules that the government is permitted to use the Espionage Act against whistle-blowers, the United States will have a de facto official secrets act. A ruling in favor of the government would instantly criminalize all disclosures of classified information to the public. It would shut down one of the most important functions of the press. And at that point any challenges to the official versions of events would dry up.

The Obama administration, to make matters worse, has mounted a war not only against those who leak information but those who publish it, including Assange. The Obama administration is attempting to force New York Times reporter James Risen to name the source, or sources, that told him about a failed effort by the Central Intelligence Agency to sabotage Iran's nuclear program. Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA officer, is charged under the Espionage Act for allegedly leaking information about the program to Risen. If Risen confirms in court that Sterling was his source, Sterling probably will be convicted. A Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Espionage Act would also remove the legal protection that traditionally allows journalists to refuse to reveal their sources.

"Unauthorized disclosures are the lifeblood of the republic," Ellsberg said. "You cannot have a meaningful democracy where the public only has authorized disclosures from the government. If they [officials] get control, if they can prosecute anybody who violates that, you are kidding yourself if you think you have any kind of democratic control over foreign policy, national security and homeland security. We don't have a democracy now in foreign affairs and national security. We have a monarchy tempered by leaks. Cut off the leaks and we don't even have that."

The WikiLeaks disclosures -- the first in 40 years to approach the scale of the Pentagon Papers -- may, if Obama has his way, be our last look into the corrupt heart of empire. Those who have access to information that exposes the lies of the state will, if the Espionage Act becomes the vehicle to halt unauthorized disclosures, not only risk their careers by providing information that challenges the official version of events but almost certainly be assured of life sentences in prison.

Ellsberg has called on those with security clearances to release the modern version of the Pentagon Papers about the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. He said his only regret was that he did not leak the Pentagon Papers earlier. If the documents had been published in August 1964, he said, rather than 1971, he would have exposed the lie that the North Vietnamese had made an "unequivocal, unprovoked" attack on U.S. destroyers in the Tonkin Gulf. The fabricated attack was used by President Lyndon Johnson to get Congress to pass the Tonkin Gulf Resolution, which authorized the administration to escalate the war. Ellsberg said that there were intelligence officials who in 2002 could have exposed the lies used by the Bush administration to plunge us into a war with Iraq. The failure of these officials to release this evidence has resulted in the deaths of, and injury to, thousands of U.S. soldiers and Marines, along with hundreds of thousands of civilians.

"Had I or one of the scores of other officials who had the same high-level information acted then on our oath of office -- which was not an oath to obey the president, nor to keep the secret that he was violating his own sworn obligations, but solely an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States -- that terrible war [the Vietnam War] might well have been averted altogether," Ellsberg said. "But to hope to have that effect, we would have needed to disclose the documents when they were current, before the escalation -- not five or seven, or even two years after the fateful commitments had been made.

"Don't do what I did," he cautioned. "Don't wait until a new war has started in Iran, until more bombs have fallen in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, Libya, Iraq or Yemen. Don't wait until thousands more have died before you go to the press and to Congress to tell the truth with documents that reveal lies or crimes or internal projections of costs and dangers. Don't wait 40 years for it to be declassified, or seven years as I did for you or someone else to leak it."

The courage of an Ellsberg or a Manning is rare. It will become even more so in a state where the law is used as a vehicle to protect those who carry out war crimes and to imprison patriots for life. If the Supreme Court rules in favor of the government on any of these six cases, it will invert the law and plunge us into totalitarian darkness.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Chris Hedges spent nearly two decades as a foreign correspondent in Central America, the Middle East, Africa and the Balkans. He has reported from more than 50 countries and has worked for The Christian Science Monitor, National Public Radio, The (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why the United States Is Destroying Its Education System

This Is What Resistance Looks Like

Hope, from now on, will look like this. Chris Hedges Speech Before Joining Anti War Vets in DC Civil Disobedience Action

A Decade After 9/11: We Are What We Loathe

The Radical Christian Right and the War on Government

Criminalizing Dissent

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 39 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

What can an average citizen do?Most people don't e... by for_hibakusha on Monday, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:34:34 PM
I was able to email you before about your writing ... by Janet Gaudiello on Monday, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:32:47 PM
Janet, you asked if there is a group we can join. ... by E. J. N. on Wednesday, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:35:03 PM
Obama is the worst president since Nixon, if not e... by MIKE BAKER on Monday, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:58:53 PM
In "Jefferson Writings" offered by the Library of ... by Blast Dorrough on Tuesday, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:36:58 AM
So you think state secrets are wrong?Do you think ... by Skeptic1 on Tuesday, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:42:17 AM
Of course all state secrets are not wrong. But to ... by Mark Halfmoon on Tuesday, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:06:50 AM
This vid shows what this is about, in case anyone ... by steve windisch on Tuesday, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:58:05 AM
I agree with your Great reply of truth, Mr. Windis... by Blast Dorrough on Tuesday, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:31:00 AM
American presidents now dispose of the equivalent ... by Marika on Tuesday, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:50:03 PM
Wait a minute. Are you seriously and with a straig... by Mark Halfmoon on Tuesday, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:22:20 PM
Most Americans fail to realize that the American a... by Blast Dorrough on Tuesday, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:04:12 PM
Someone who thinks giving away classified document... by Skeptic1 on Wednesday, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:29:41 PM
The article said  "Juan Ernesto Mendez, the U... by Skeptic1 on Wednesday, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:38:12 PM
The Allied Forces have lost some six thousand troo... by Blast Dorrough on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:34:01 AM
Well, maybe you should.It certainly doesn't jive w... by Skeptic1 on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:08:41 AM
"Jefferson and John Adams when they went to call... by Skeptic1 on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:28:31 AM
Regarding Jefferson's statements about religious t... by E. J. N. on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:05:12 PM
I think you are really stretching it to think that... by Skeptic1 on Friday, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:38:44 AM
The statement that "Theocracy, in any form, is not... by E. J. N. on Friday, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:16:08 PM
Lots of fiction in this comment. See if you can pi... by Skeptic1 on Friday, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:06:44 AM
Ayatollah Khomeini Khomeini accordingly deliver... by Skeptic1 on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:23:39 AM
The "Supreme Ayatollah" of Iran picks and chooses ... by E. J. N. on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:23:37 PM
Are you forgetting that "Supreme Ayatollah" is the... by Skeptic1 on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:00:19 PM
Your questioning if I'm "forgetting" who is the re... by E. J. N. on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:18:00 PM
That is a guy is in charge of 70 million people , ... by Skeptic1 on Saturday, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:23:08 AM
I suspect you simply like being contentious, but&n... by E. J. N. on Saturday, Mar 17, 2012 at 12:58:52 PM
I have never been in a church where "rule the worl... by Skeptic1 on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:13:51 AM
Skeptic, you are pretty insistent that Islam is th... by E. J. N. on Monday, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:58:28 PM
Its clear who is the only one who is out to rule t... by Michael Dewey on Tuesday, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:21:33 AM
All man-contrived religioncraft is based on the de... by Blast Dorrough on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:54:26 PM
Most of the Founding Fathers were indeed Deists, a... by E. J. N. on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:36:09 PM
No matter what a person could have done to  v... by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:13:05 PM
I bet Manning had it better off than our GIs in th... by Skeptic1 on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:05:34 PM
While I agree with you that there should be and mu... by E. J. N. on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:15:41 PM
I would argue that recent NDAA and  the Eric ... by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:22:48 PM
Theocrats misinterpret and distort their religions... by E. J. N. on Friday, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:32:40 PM
And until you understand that simple fact, yes it ... by Skeptic1 on Monday, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:14:06 AM
That's the one that worships money and power.... by Mark Sashine on Monday, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:22:48 AM