Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats

OpEdNews Op Eds

Suffer the Little Children

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 3/11/11
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)

When I was growing up in the fifties, my parents, grandparents, and all the adults I knew lived an ethic of sacrifice. During the Great Depression and World War II they'd learned it was sometimes necessary to sacrifice for our children.  This moral precept used to be shared throughout the US, but recently it's been lost.  As a consequence, Congress now threatens to abandon America's children.

Americans cherish the notion that we are the number one nation on earth; that no matter what the metric is the US comes out ahead of other countries.  But that's far from the truth when the focus is on how we treat our children.  A recent study rated developed nations in terms of a "children's index" and the US came in 34 th out 43 -- Sweden was number 1 and Bosnia 43; Canada was 21 and England 24.  The Children's Index included infant mortality and in 2009 the US had an infant mortality rate of 6.3 percent.  According to the UN that placed us 33 rd among 195 nations (the CIA ranked us 46 th among 226 nations) -- Iceland was number 1, while England and Canada were 22 and 23.  Furthermore, among industrialized nations only Mexico has a higher percentage of children living in poverty than does the US.

We're not only not number one in terms of how we treat our children, but over time our ranking has deteriorated.   Why?  What's happened to us?

Despite our differences on other issues, Americans once agreed on the necessity for caring for all our children.  For Christians this ethic stemmed from Jesus' teaching, "And who shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me." (Matthew 18)  For legalists, the admonition derived from the Parens Patriae concept in English common law, the notion that the King was ultimately the "father" of all children and, therefore, the state could intercede to protect them.  Then something shifted in our collective morality. 

Perhaps this change can be attributed to a new generation of conservative Christian doctrine that pays more attention to whether or not an individual adheres to the dogma of a particular denomination rather than whether the believer follows the teachings of Jesus.  Thus, while the US continues to be a "Christian" nation, there has been savage infighting among the factions and our children have often been the "collateral damage."

Perhaps it's the new racism.  Starting with Ronald Reagan's successful 1980 presidential campaign, Republicans -- as part of their "Southern strategy -- adopted "stealth" racism.  It became politically incorrect to denigrate people-of-color because of their race or ethnicity and instead politicians suggested that minorities did not deserve the same privileges as white folks because they were "lazy" -- this was the import of Reagan's infamous "welfare queen" remark.  This stance "justified" cutting back on welfare, housing, medical assistance, education, and social support in general on the grounds that people-of-color were leeches.  And in this blanket indictment, children were dismissed along with their parents. 

Perhaps we've gotten lazy.  In a recent TIME magazine article, journalist Fareed Zakaria proffered a simple explanation for our ethical deterioration: "America's success has made it sclerotic."  In metric after metric the US has fallen from number one to a lower rank: we're now number 6, among developed nations, in higher-education enrollment, number 28 in "perception that working hard gets you ahead," number 84 in "domestic savings rate" and on and on.  

As Americans have grown complacent, our political discourse has been dumbed down.  These days politicians make exaggerated statements and US voters lap it up without questioning the truth of what they hear.  We're told "government is the problem" and tax cuts will solve all our woes.  As political comedian Will Durst delights in pointing out, Americans now believe in "free beer;" many citizens appear to be convinced they can enjoy governmental services for free.  As a consequence, Americans want good schools, but they don't want to pay for them.

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman observed that the victims of this cavalier attitude are our children.  America's sclerosis threatens every aspect of child welfare from health services to education.  For example, House Republicans propose to slash WIC the widely acclaimed program to feed pregnant women and infants.  WIC is the acronym for the "Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children" that provides care for low-income pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and infants and children under the age of five.  It's supported by overwhelming scientific data showing that prenatal and infant nutrition is the major determinant of a child's health and intelligence.  (Some Republicans also want to repeal child labor laws.)

Whatever the reason, America appears to have lost the ethic that it's necessary to sacrifice in order to ensure our children have a better life.  In fact, Republicans would rather cut Federal programs that benefit our children -- programs that are demonstrably successful -- than they would tax millionaires.  

How low will Americans sink before we realize that our collective narcissism is jeopardizing the future of the US?  Or are we willing to abandon our children?


Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer. In a previous life he was one of the executive founders of Cisco Systems.
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ten Telltale Signs of Republican Disease

Big Liars and The Voters Who Love Them

Obama vs. Romney: The Bottom Line

The GOP Chooses Fascism

Obama vs. Romney: The Popularity Contest

2011 Budget Battle: Obama Wins While Democrats Lose


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

As a psychotherapist in practice for 30 years and ... by Sheri Noga on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:35:43 PM
You need to get out in the real world. Just try t... by bern on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:12:17 PM
... good sir, that the word you are not using corr... by Debbie Scally on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:46:18 AM
at the problem is not going to solve anything - ex... by Doc McCoy on Saturday, Mar 12, 2011 at 6:44:28 AM
We build school with gyms, football fields, and t... by bern on Saturday, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:02:01 AM
I notice your evaluation of the "moral precept" ex... by John Creamer on Saturday, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:48:43 PM