Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   7 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Should the Government Take Over A.I.G.?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 3/20/09

When the tragic A.I.G. picture completely unfolded with the scandalous picture amid executive leadership stating that bonuses needed to be paid to operatives under existing contracts or lawsuits were inevitable, the first thought that should surface within anyone analyzing this picture is just where were the high-powered lawyers?

The executive leadership of the nation and its two legislative branches have long contained within their ranks those considered to be among the "best and the brightest" legal minds.

If one accepts the aforementioned then one supreme element stands out. Simple protective safeguards could have been invoked that would be routinely applied to important business contracts. Indeed, had some of these critical points been neglected, lawyers involved in the contract writing would be looking for work.

The use of a condition precedent and condition subsequent, two staples of contract law, could have been invoked to protect taxpayers. The condition precedent would have been simple. In order for government money to be received for A.I.G.'s assistance all previous contracts calling for bonuses of any kind would be declared null and void.

The proposed arrangement was termed a "bailout" which presumes emergency circumstances. In emergency circumstances bonuses should not ever be under consideration so the legislation should have included such a protective condition precedent.

A condition subsequent could also have placed within the scope of the defining bailout package. This would have mandated A.I.G. to meet certain conditions consistent with the receipt of taxpayer money during an emergency period.

If those conditions failed to be met then the agreement would thereupon become null and void with the government on behalf of the taxpayers demanding immediate receipt of all funds extended.

In ordinary business circumstances receiverships are promptly sought in a court of equity when individuals are suffering continuing irreparable harm. This can be said about American taxpayers in lieu of what is occurring at A.I.G.

It has been acknowledged that the government, meaning the U.S. taxpayers, own 80 percent of A.I.G. Under any circumstances that should be a controlling interest.

Therefore, with the taxpayers holding a controlling interest in A.I.G., then what about the possibility of a suit in a court of equity to prevent an irresponsible management group from generating more irreparable harm on U.S. taxpayers?

How about suing for a government takeover of A.I.G. at least until such time that order can be restored and its financial house put in order? Receiverships have long been available as a redress under U.S. common law. Should such an action be considered under the present emergency?

With so many lawyers on the government payroll, should we not be hearing more about such tactical procedures? Why was there not protective language in any and all agreements pertaining to recipient of such vast government funds?

These are questions that demand immediate answers.

 

Began in the journalism field in hometown of Los Angeles. Started as Sports Editor and Movie Writer at Inglewood Daily News chain after working in sportswriting of high school events at the Los Angeles Examiner.

Received a bachelor's in (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Koch Brothers Own Scott Walker

The Casey Anthony Photo that Dominates the Trial

Reagan, Deregulation and the Slippery Road to Poisoned Assets

When the CIA Overthrew Iran for British Petroleum

Did 12 Heads of Cabbage Decide the Casey Anthony Trial?

Fox News and the Dumbing Down of America

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Then re-regulate them and split them up into busin... by August Adams on Friday, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:43:28 PM
We should have let them file bankruptcy, and restr... by UncleSim on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:12:16 PM
What "Government"?There is no legitimate... by William Whitten on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:51:05 PM
Here are the relevant code numbers to show who rea... by William Whitten on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:15:26 PM
What would happen if they went bankrupt?  Wou... by UncleSim on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:16:54 PM
AIG is two companies, a long standing (re-)insuran... by BajaWind on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:24:39 PM
Why do so many progressives consistently fail to s... by UncleSim on Saturday, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:35:57 PM