Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

Sellout On The Great Lakes

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 11/4/09

Become a Fan
  (10 fans)
Last week, some very disturbing events took place regarding 52 very large freighters (1000 foot-long class with 40,000 to 70,000 ton cargo holds) based in and on the Great Lakes. These ships, which carry millions of tons of heavy cargoes across the Lakes through the locks of St. Lawrence Seaway to the world, burn the dirtiest dregs of refinery scum in the world -- bunker C oil. This stuff is so sludgy it has to be heated to flow into the old diesels that burn it. 13 of the 52 "Lakers" as they are called have no pollution controls whatsoever. Each puts out enough pollution to equate to over 100,000 cars and trucks. All 52 produce as much CO2 as all the cars in Michigan, and they run these engines 24/7/365.

The story can be gleaned from the Washington Post this week in these three articles:
click here" target="_blank">click here;/a>
click here" target="_blank">click here;/a>
click here" target="_blank">click here;/a>

and the latest herein:
Nation Digest
Thursday, October 29, 2009
ENVIRONMENT

A pact on cleaner fuel for Great Lakes ships

Lawmakers reached a compromise Tuesday on a proposed Environmental Protection Agency rule that would force ships to burn much cleaner fuel.

Language added to an Interior Department appropriations bill would exempt 13 Great Lakes steamships from the rule and allow the remaining 52 U.S.-flagged Great Lakes ships to ask for a waiver if more expensive, cleaner fuel is unavailable or would cause them undue economic hardship. The language also calls for the EPA to report within six months on the rule's economic impact.


The compromise was spearheaded by Reps. David R. Obey (D-Wis.) and James L. Oberstar (D-Minn.) and other Great Lakes legislators because of fears that the rule would increase shipping costs enough to harm the global competitiveness of regional commodities such as steel and grain.

-- Kari Lydersen


Obey and Oberstar have great influence over the EPA. They control the purse strings. There are as you may know great forces at work here to save jobs today at the expense of the environment and deal a crushing blow to the green jobs industries nascent in the Midwest (Wind power systems and ammonia production from renewable power). The advocates for change are subjugated by the old economy stalwarts who are conning the Congressmen to allow the old technologies to continue unabated and destroy the newer alternatives. The EPA is bending to their will.

What should be done is to retrofit all these ships with ammonia-burning systems with ammonia fuel tanks. The ammonia will burn in the old diesels with virtually the same energy efficiency yet produce zero emissions of CO2 and unburned hydrocarbons and toxic gasses (bunker C is loaded with sulfur, lead, mercury, arsenic, radioactive elements, and other crud). The effluent from ammonia combustion is only nitrogen and water vapor. We can feed ammonia to the ships' ports via 3000 miles of pipelines that currently branch into the heartland of the Midwest. Renewable energy producers should be producing ammonia from the new wind farms if the markets within the impacted states allow that to happen, but current ammonia sources can do it today. This is a great opportunity for the EPA to take point in a campaign to stop 5 million cars' worth of CO2 pollution right now.

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Let the EPA rules on conversion of fuels for heavy cargo carriers go into effect

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Designed first all-solar home for Ryland Homes in 1974. At MITRE, led a group of 35 of the best minds in the world (including Dr. Edward Teller, among others) who performed detailed engineering, scientific, socio-economic, and political analyses of (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

American Energy Policy V -- Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion

The Link Between Global Warming and Mega-Quakes - Reprise

American Energy Policy Part II -- Ammonia

The Link Between Climate Change and Geological Disruption: Can Global Warming Be A Cause of Earthquakes?

Middle Class Ordeal

American Energy Policy IV: The Price of Transition

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The WP links should be:click hereclick hereclick h... by Paul from Potomac on Monday, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:12:24 PM