Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
13 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

SCOTUS: America's Supremely Corrupt Supreme Court

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Supported 3   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 11/11/13

Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

opednews.com

Here are five questions I'd like to ask the Supreme Court of the United States :

1.    How can you expect us to take the law seriously when you so clearly don't?  

This is not a frivolous question.   You claim to base your rulings on the Constitution, the highest law of the land.   Everybody knows you were chosen for your political views, not your prowess as jurists or legal scholars.   But once there, you have lifetime tenure.   The pressure is off.   So why don't you shed your prejudices and try a bit harder to approximate impartial justice?

   The senior member of the Court, Antonin Scalia, is a caricature of a judge, a disgrace to the legal profession, and a menace to society.   And yet four of you consistently vote with him on crucial questions that determine our fate!   That's positively absurd.   You should be ashamed of yourselves.    

  
From http://www.flickr.com/photos/32601019@N02/6239587935/: 'The Law'
'The Law'
(image by Rob_sg)


2.   Why do you pretend to be impartial when you so obviously let your own political predilections and prejudices get in the way of the truth at every turn?

For example, everybody knows that corporations are not people.   Four of you are honest about it.   Why do five of you insist on making fools of yourselves and pretending otherwise?

3.   If corporations are people by your twisted definition, why aren't people corporations with the same Constitutional rights, legal protections, bailouts, and tax breaks corporations get?    

Following the 2008 financial meltdown -- a crisis and job-destroying recession engineered by high-flying investment bankers, hedge fund managers, and venture capitalists -- the banks got bailed out while many homeowners were faced with foreclosure.   TARP shelled out $700 billion of the taxpayers' money.   But that was just a drop in the bucket, according to an investigative team at Bloomberg News:   ""at one point last year the U.S. had lent, spent or guaranteed as much as $12.8 trillion to rescue the economy."

   Also, corporations get all kinds of tax breaks not available to real people.   Some of the biggest corporations in America pay no income tax at all.   Others pay at a rate middle class tax payers can only envy.   If corporations are people, why do ordinary people pay more -- a lot more -- on "earned income" than corporate plutocrats do who pay at the "capital gains" rate of 15% or less.   Who was surprised when Mitt ("Corporations are people, my friend") Romney finally admitted that he paid considerably less than 15%?

   Meanwhile, corporate income tax which produced as much one-third of total federal revenue in the 1950s now accounts for a mere 10%.   During this same time-span, however, corporate assets grew 15 times in 2007 constant dollars, nearly twice as fast as household median income.   But personal income taxes paid by the middle class now account for over 45% of total federal revenue, with the remainder coming out of payroll taxes.    So, to repeat, why don't you   rule that making some people (wage-earners) pay more than other "people" (corporations) is unconstitutional?

4.   If you really think corporations are people, why not dogs?

Corporations are worse than most real people.   Dogs are better.    Ask anyone who's ever had a dog.    Dogs are loyal and trustworthy.   They have a heart.   They're nothing like banks and corporations.   Given a choice between dogs and corporations, most people would choose dogs any old day.

   Don't believe me?   Commission a survey.   Go ahead, Supreme Court, I dare you!   Ask this simple question:   In your view, are dogs or corporations more like people?   I think we both know that dogs would win hands down.

   Most people who are not corporations wouldn't give a fig to save JPMorgan or Goldman Sachs of ExxonMobile, but they'd jump into a raging river to save a drowning dog.   That's because most people know a dog would try to save them, too.   I can't say the same for cats, but if you do decide that dogs deserve the same rights as corporations, consider including cats, too.   A lot of cat-lovers will be barking mad if you don't.

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/47422005@N04/5985153020/: The Supreme Court 2011
The Supreme Court 2011
(image by DonkeyHotey)

 

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.worldviewwest.com

Tom Magstadt earned his doctorate in international relations at Johns Hopkins (SAIS). He is a twice-tenured college professor and political science chair. He also served as a foreign intelligence analyst, a Visiting Professor at the Air University (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sick in America: What Today's Reactionaries Don't Want You to Know

Dancing Toward Doomsday: Who Cares?

SCOTUS: America's Supremely Corrupt Supreme Court

Shutdown: Congress, Coup Plotters, And the Ghost of Joe McCarthy

Colorado Sheriffs, Gun Control, and the Rule of Law

What Did Marx Know And When Did He Know It? Capitalism's Dirty Little Secret...

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Supreme Court:  Everybody knows you were all ... by Thomas Magstadt on Monday, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:23:38 AM
Your article is just the tip of the iceberg.  ... by Bob Bennett on Monday, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:31:06 AM
Thanks for your comments, Bob Bennet.   ... by Thomas Magstadt on Monday, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:23:20 PM
Ideology about Peak Earth is why we see the dissol... by Tony N on Monday, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:03:08 PM
Sad when every branch of government is corrupt. &n... by jbnewport on Monday, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:18:56 PM
Well put.  Thank you!  ... by Thomas Magstadt on Monday, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:20:34 PM
Your article is essentially nothing but a rant abo... by Joe Reeser on Monday, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:31:36 PM
Its more then a rant its fact something you conser... by kappie on Monday, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:48:03 PM
You offer sound advice, Joe.  Now take it ser... by Thomas Magstadt on Monday, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:27:55 PM
Well said!  My thanks to author, Thomas Magst... by Bill Dugan on Monday, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:02:43 PM
Amen.  Thanks, Bill!... by Thomas Magstadt on Monday, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:18:13 PM
We are living in an age where bribes & payoff... by JenniferWNY on Monday, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:05:48 PM
Go Jennifer!... by Thomas Magstadt on Monday, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:30:23 PM