Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Romney Can't Attack Akin and Give Ryan a Pass -- They've Been In Lockstep For Years

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 8/28/12

Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

Republican Lockstep by Meryl Ann Butler for OpEdNews.com
Throughout this election year, Republican candidates have competed to see which one could take the most retrograde positions on issues concerning women's health and rights.   These antics were dismissed by many as little more than posturing for primary votes.   This week, reality will intervene   when the Republican Party embraces some of the worst of these for its official party position .

Just last week, the Romney-Ryan led Republican Party voted to include dangerously restrictive language into their Party Platform position on abortion.   In doing so, they are adopting backward-looking and anti-woman policies that cannot be dismissed as campaign rhetoric.   The positions candidates have been taking are now displayed as the goal they seek. Positions once thought to be extreme are officially main stream for the Republican Party of 2012.

The Republican Party platform includes a human life amendment that would criminalize abortion nationwide, with no exceptions for rape and incest. That's right, the party that claims to abhor the heavy hand of government is using it as a club to impose its own view on a woman's most private and deeply personal decisions, making her and her doctor criminals in the process.

Party platforms are declarations of principles and values that show what the party stands for and are used to reveal   how a party would like to see their leaders govern.   These platforms are written with the direction and consent of their Presidential candidates.   Through this action, we now know precisely what   Mitt Romney hopes to accomplish if elected President.

Some have argued that Romney's position is not as extreme as the platform, that Romney accepts exceptions to the general criminalization of abortion.   They are especially quick to claim Romney's position differs from Paul Ryan's, the person he chose as his Vice Presidential running mate.   Apparently they are fearful that women will come to understand that Ryan is more than ultra conservative on fiscal issues;   he also has co-sponsored 38 anti-abortion measures, one of which attempted to redefine rape as "forcible" rape.  

The attempt to distinguish between Romney and Ryan is an exercise in deception.   Both of them vow to take away federal funding for Planned Parenthood's birth control programs, a vital health care service for millions of women.   More important, the platform language on which Romney will run reflects Ryan's extreme position, the very one apologists attempt to say is "not Romney's."  

The apologists also point to Romney's and Ryan's efforts to distance themselves from Todd Akin and his outrageous comments on legitimate-rape and the mythology that women who are raped rarely get pregnant.   The record shows that Ryan and Akin have been in lockstep on principle, if not rhetoric,   for years -- even working together to narrow the definition of rape and outlaw abortion for rape victims.

In an interview last week with KDKA News in Pennsylvania, Paul Ryan called this important conversation a "distraction." That's what politicians say when the public starts to pay attention to one of their positions that is unpalatable and usually promoted in the shadows of the legislative process to appease the base.

But what is a distraction for Paul Ryan is an existential threat to American women.   Our full social, political and economic equality has never been in greater political jeopardy.   That's why we have got to pay attention, and we have got to get involved.


 

Kate Michelman is one of the most respected and influential women leaders in America today.

For nearly 20 years, she served as President of NARAL Pro-Choice America, catapulting the organization to prominence as the nation's premier (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How Long Will Equal Pay Take to Achieve?

Trading Women's Rights for Partisan Politics

Romney Can't Attack Akin and Give Ryan a Pass -- They've Been In Lockstep For Years

To Hell and Back in Just 45 Years

The Election Is Over, but the Fight Goes On

Why women chose Gosnell: Pa. politicians continue to make it harder for women to get safe abortions

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Now with the Todd Akin RAPE "doctrine" and the To... by ajain31 on Tuesday, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:10:22 PM
But I say vote third party. No matter what.... by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:16:30 PM
I understand your frustration, but this election i... by Dave Kilby on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:51:00 PM
There are at least 12 reasons why Mitt Romney wou... by ajain31 on Tuesday, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:13:07 PM