Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   5 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Revisionism And Hypocrisy

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 1/17/11

Become a Fan
  (10 fans)

The new project of the Tea Party Movement is to revise American history and sanitize it to the extent that it is a vapid, happy-ever-after, scrubbed and polished neo-modern version of the historical record. From Texas to Tennessee, Tea Baggers are petitioning the legislature to legally make changes to text books used in education to write their version of historical events, especially slavery and the history of other minority peoples.

Stupidity and lunacy oftentimes go together and the Tea Baggers have demonstrated an unusual aptitude for both but their new program of revisionism exposes an inability to grasp a fundamental concept that even a toddler can understand. And just because you will something away that's not to your liking does not mean that it's non-existent. That's just plain stupid reasoning.

The latest thing for the Tea Partiers is to push for a law(s) that would revise history to erase or tone down historical references to the Founding Fathers owning of Black slaves. These laws, if the Tea Baggers have their say, would rewrite the governing of the selection of textbooks.

Now I don't know about you but changing a law to enact revisions and changes to textbooks to make slavery and the Founding Fathers, well, more saintly is stupid because everyone knows that there is enough irrefutable evidence to support the fact that many were slave owners. In fact, there was a particularly odious clause in the constitution that in 1789, African-Americans were defined in the Constitution as "3/5 of a person" for counting representation, and could not vote at all.

That of course has long been a very uncomfortable fact even though that clause was struck from the US Constitution in 1865 following the Civil War. For 90 years thereafter, states did all sorts of things to abridge the right to vote for African-Americans. The main means were seemingly "objective" criteria like "literacy laws," which required that a person be able to read before they could register to vote. Since most African-Americans at the time were illiterate, that effectively prevented their voting. There were many cases before the Supreme Court, mostly in southern states, in which means of blocking the vote were removed.

The real change came during the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s, when the last of the racial restrictions were finally removed. Prior to the 1960s, the Supreme Court had determined that schools could be "separate but equal," which meant there were separate schools for African-Americans. During the 1960s, the Supreme Court enforced the desegregation of the schools on the grounds that "separate is inherently unequal."

Legally speaking, the right to vote came with the 15th amendment. But socially speaking, it took the Civil Rights movement to make it a reality. Now the whack jobs in the Tea Party Movement in Tennessee are seeking to strike these kinds of unsettling facts from History books and other educational material on the grounds that " Neglect and outright ill will have distorted the teaching of the history and character of the United States. We seek to compel the teaching of students in Tennessee the truth regarding the history of our nation and the nature of its government."

Textbooks would be vetted by this standard: "No portrayal of minority experience in the history which actually occurred shall obscure the experience or contributions of the Founding Fathers...." The Tea Party in Tennessee is seeking in its own words to address "an awful lot of made-up criticism about, for instance, the founders intruding on the Indians or having slaves or being hypocrites in one way or another."

So according to the Tea Baggers this history, in their view, is made up and they want to set the historical record straight. But facts are pesky and persistent things and no amount of lunacy and delusions will debunk that or make them go away.   Just as the sexual activities between slave women and their masters are facts so too does the human nature of the Founding Fathers that were part and parcel of the slave owning system in the United States.

To separate the Founding Fathers from the institution of slavery in the United States is like trying to make sugar salt -" it is impossible. So trying to rewrite history to place them above and divorced from the very economic system of the United States at that time is clearly delusional thinking. And just as important is the courageous and important struggles of the anti-slavery movement in the United States since both activities have given the United States, for better or worse, its essential character.

So the dilemma for the Tea Party Movement is how to deal with the other people in the institutionalized system of slavery on both sides of the debate. How will they handle people like Harriet Tubman or Nat Turner? How will they place Governor Wallace the epitome of the pro-segregationist movement? Pretending that they do not exist in the context of America's slave system history is just plain dumb.

It is the latest in a long series of events that are aimed at "taking back our country" -" one of the mantras of the Tea Party Movement. I don't know who has taken away "their country" that they would move to get it back. Maybe America is just a choice piece to real estate to these people. I just don't know.

But in the end it is true that history is a persistent son of a gun and both written and oral traditions make sure that facts endure and no matter the lunacy of a group of people that want to sanitize the America's slave past it will endure for generations to come.

 

MICHAEL D. ROBERTS is a top Political Strategist and Business, Management and Communications Specialist in New York City's Black community. He is an experienced writer whose specialty is socio-political and economic analysis and local (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wordsmiths And The Delusional

Blacks Killing Blacks

2014 FIFA World Cup: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

GOP Sore Losers Brigade

Actually, Guns Do Kill People

Why Black History Is important

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I would listen and agree more vehemently would you... by S. Paul Forrest on Monday, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:17:20 PM
Come on! You have to be joking? and angry? you mis... by Michael Roberts on Monday, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:03:01 PM
...and thought to myself how ridiculous they make ... by JC Garrett on Monday, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:00:33 PM
AMERICAN HISTORY: REVISED, SANITIZED, AND MADE HAP... by Beverly Bentley on Tuesday, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:34:08 AM
Those same Tea Parties are mostly largely made up ... by John Reed on Tuesday, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:14:53 PM