Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   3 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Response to "Myths and Facts H.R. 875 – The Food Safety Modernization Act"

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Valuable 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

I recently read a communication being circulated by Food and Water Watch which was apparently intended to dispel "rumors circulating the internet about H.R. 875 The Food Safety Modernization Act".  I fully appreciate FWW and indeed have benefited from their important work (I think the Factory Farming Map on their website is one of the best examples of effective communication on our current struggling Agricultural Paradigm).  I find, however, on this issue that they are missing some of the nuances in this proposed legislation.  I write this not from any pejorative point of view but more from that of a respectful and collaborative stakeholder.  I hope that it is received in the same spirit.

Response to: "Myths and Facts about HR 875 (and S425)"

I find it peculiar that the organizations who should be vetting this proposed legislation (who actually seem to be partial advocates of said) seem to have no knowledge of the shoot first ask questions later record of State and local agencies around the country at the behest of the FDA and USDA.  Trent Hendricks; Mark Nolt; Manna Storehouse; Sharon Palmer; Etc.  In California AB 1735 which established a max 10 coliform limit on Raw Milk (the same limit as pasteurized milk) was recommended by CDFA to "simply comply with fed regulations for interstate shipment".  Seemingly innocuous until you bother to notice that Raw Milk cannot be shipped interstate, which rendered the recommendation an outright lie.  It didn't matter.  The legislators were tricked (they said so themselves in session) but the bill was signed by the governor and stands as law today (and the very vocal consumers and two commercial producers had absolutely no say in the matter).

The first caution of the FDA at the onset of the recent and very serious Salmonella outbreak was to stay away from raw milk, eggs and meat (not peanut butter cookies which was the actual threat).  Unfortunately it is nothing new for the FDA to forsake REAL FOOD for NOVELTIES.  

This current federal  legislation lacks specificity which is the problem.  It poses as regulation for the larger food industry but doesn't exclude the small and local operator.  I'd probably feel very different if I didn't know that the USDA and FDA had a track record of influence, favoritism and indeed leadership by AGRI-Business.  My considerable analysis has left me with the opinion that these agencies have become trade organizations rather than the watchdog for human and environmental health that they should be.  I do not trust an agency which has a history of championing the very questionable rBST and a pendulous policy regarding high fructose corn sweetener.  I'm not diminishing the good they do and have done, I just trust a good farmer more than most of the questionable, reductionist science that has ushered us into the current struggling agricultural paradigm.  I think congress needs to consult the actual farmers rather than intellectual property attorneys on issues that will change their lives let alone their customers.  

The important aspects of this proposed legislation (i.e.: proper manufacture, storage, handling, best practices etc.) need to happen beyond the farm and should be the responsibility of the industry that is necessitating it.  The responsible operator who processes a few head a week and direct sells it to ME at a farmers market or in his farm store, and the very responsible CSA operator who brings me my MIXED BOX of fresh, local, organic vegetables (that are actually touching each other in the same box)  shouldn't have to pay for the sins of the 12,000 hog CAFO, or factories pumping out tankers of "peanut paste" who created the problem.  

I would gladly recommend  a competent panel who could help correct the current congressional vision.  I don't know of a farmer who doesn't know where all of his animals are and ear tags and brands are already pervasive.  If they want to "rfid" an animal do it when it hits the feedlot that way I can be sure my children won't ingest it.  If they want to make it mandatory for animals that are intended for export?  Great.  Make it the responsibility and burden of the exporters not me, my family and countless others who don't want any part of that system.  Leave those of us who have struggled and are struggling, without the help and in spite of the government, to create a humane and survivable agricultural paradigm out of legislation that is claiming to address industrial food safety.  If they want to include us, they need to give us a seat at the table and be prepared to listen.

The "FACTS" about this proposed legislation is that it most definitely could be used to turn all of the "MYTHS" into a hellish reality.  

I recommend that people actually READ THE TEXT OF THESE BILLS!!!!!!  within the context of the history of this country.

Respectfully,

Aaron Lucich

www.WeAreWhatWeEat.org 

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Please Stop H.R. 875 and S 425 in their current form.

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Response to "Myths and Facts H.R. 875 – The Food Safety Modernization Act"

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Kudos! You are correct to ask these questions! Eve... by Lee Cornell on Tuesday, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:54:59 PM
With all due respect, I see nothing in Section 206... by David G on Wednesday, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:03:28 PM
Excuse me, i meant "nothing in Section 206 th... by David G on Wednesday, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:08:32 PM