Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Reconciliation: Not New. Not Controversial. And Wouldn't Be Used For Vast Majority of Health Reform

By Press Release  Posted by Steven Leser (about the submitter)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 2/28/10

opednews.com

For Immediate Release Contact: Jacki Schechner 202-510-0605

February 25, 2010

Reconciliation: Not New. Not Controversial. And Wouldn't Be Used For Vast Majority of Health Reform

News Outlets Continue To Get It Wrong On Reconciliation. History Proves The "Majority Rule" Process Is Far From Extraordinary - Even For Health Care Legislation

The idea that reconciliation is unprecedented or a subversion of Senate rules is wrong. It's also wrong to say "health care reform" will be passed through reconciliation. In fact, the vast majority of health care reform has already passed the Senate despite an attempted Republican filibuster that forced repeated cloture votes in December.

If President Obama and Democratic leadership in Congress decide to use the budget reconciliation process to complete health care reform, they won't be using it for the entire bill. In fact, they will only be using it for a narrow list of improvements to the bill, in lieu of a formal conference, which the Republicans have promised to obstruct.

Reconciliation isn't controversial, and it isn't rare. While Republicans frame the process as an extraordinary measure used to "ram through" legislation, reconciliation has been used in most years since its first use in 1980 19 times. In fact, in every Congress since the procedure was created, except for the last Congress (2007 2008), the reconciliation process was used to pass significant legislation, and the last nine budget reconciliation bills were initiated and passed by Republican Congresses. Reconciliation is not the same as the so-called "nuclear option," the unprecedented 2005 Republican threat to rewrite the Senate procedural rules midstream to pass judicial nominees that didn't have the votes for Senate confirmation.

But even if reconciliation were to be used for more than just a narrow list of improvements to the bill, as NPR reported Wednesday, "health care and reconciliation actually have a lengthy history. 'In fact, the way in which virtually all of health reform, with very, very limited exceptions, has happened over the past 30 years has been the reconciliation process,' says Sara Rosenbaum, who chairs the Department of Health Policy at George Washington University....In fact, over the past three decades, the number of major health financing measures that were NOT passed via budget reconciliation can be counted on one hand. And one of those -- the 1988 Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act -- was repealed the following year after a backlash by seniors who were asked to underwrite the measure themselves. So using the process to try to pass a health overhaul bill might not be easy. But it won't be unprecedented."

Full NPR article below:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124009985

Health Care No Stranger To Reconciliation Process

by JULIE ROVNER

February 24, 2010

To reconcile or not to reconcile -- when it comes to a health overhaul bill, that seems to be the biggest argument of the moment.

At issue is a process called budget reconciliation. By writing Obama's health care plan as a budget bill, Democrats can prevent a Republican filibuster in the Senate and advance the bill with a simple majority instead of the 60-vote supermajority they no longer have.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Editor

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

McCain Campaign Violated McCain-Feingold law with Palin Clothing Purchases

McCain attacked 18 year old Chelsea Clinton in 1998 now says Palin's family & kids are off limits

McCain says "Horseshit" on National TV During Debate

North Korea – Impending Missile Launch May Require US Military Action

Palin: Drill Baby Drill, but blame Obama for the Spill!

Palin to McCain - Oops I did it Again

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

A very important reminder at a very important time... by Marta Steele on Sunday, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:12:16 PM
What do we need bipartisanship for anyway? When th... by Progessive 1 on Monday, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:22:15 AM
The majority of Americans do not support the Obama... by BARB BF on Monday, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:00:43 AM
Its time for progressives to form a new party.We n... by Jay Nilva on Monday, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:10:10 AM