Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   43 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Progressivism Fails Because Democrats are Afraid to Advance a Progressive Agenda

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 7/20/10

Become a Fan
  (65 fans)

WI: Sen. Feingold speaks in support of Barack Obama in Eau Claire, August 24, 2008 by aflcio


A USA Today/ Gallup poll based on "telephone interviews conducted June 11-13, 2010, with a random sample of 1,014 adults, aged 18 and older, living in the continental U.S." suggests a majority of the American population does not know if the term "progressive" describes their political views. The poll represents the possibility that many Americans have no idea what it means to be "progressive" or why one might enjoy anointing one's self with the label of "progressive."

One conclusion from these results could be that this provides an explanation for why progressivism has failed so far in the United States. However, that idea seems to ignore the fact that those responsible for advancing progressivism through the passage of legislation, for example, are politicians. Politicians in this country are most certainly aware of the presence of "progressives" and what they stand for, as they are a potential constituency to be won (and divided) in elections.

A failure of understanding among Americans of what a "progressive" is might have more to do with a political failure among Democrats to articulate specifically what a
"progressive" stands for. And, is that necessarily a bad thing? In the "Bottom Line" section of the poll results, the analysis reads, "Given the high degree of public uncertainty about what the term means -- as well as the lack of opposition to it from the political center -- that could be a successful strategy, at least if the goal is to avoid being pigeonholed."

In an article posted on Salon.com titled, "Does the left even know what "progressive" means?" Ned Resnikoff, an NYU student, further illuminates the results of this poll. First, he addresses what the term means noting that, after the left allowed conservatives to turn "liberal" into a slur, "progressive" has replaced "liberal." Essentially, "progressive" has been a political faction's attempt at re-branding in this country.

Resnikoff looks at how progressives have failed to define what a "progressive" is and suggests asking what is a "liberal" in order to gain some insight into what a progressive's worldview happens to be. He highlights the modern conservative movement's ability to articulate their worldview and how progressives have quite often been "a morass of factions and interests that sometimes work in harmony and often don't. A ragtag group that can never seem to find a consistent frame for the policy proposals it puts forth."

Glenn Beck and President Obama, as Resnikoff also points out, have offered definitions of the progressive worldview. Beck's definition of the progressive worldview is unfortunately, for those wishing to become informed, much easier to find than Obama's definition (that's likely because he hasn't talked specifically of progressivism in any interviews or speeches).

Beck thinks, "Progressivism is a cancer in America" and "it is meant to eat our Constitution." Beck delights in offering his own version of the history of progressivism in America and never hesitates to set his sights on President Woodrow Wilson and the progressive ideas he believed in.

This could be part of the reason progressivism has failed. Those who articulate and explain what progressivism is often have as much of an idea of what progressivism is as the people who have no idea what the label "progressive" means. Also, there's a tendency for people like Hillary Clinton to anoint themselves with the label "progressive," which masks real views and can be confusing because it appears progressive just means a willingness to support progress and move forward; to a certain extent, that is progressivism but really it's a lot more than that.

The Center for American Progress (CAP), a progressive think tank, has published reports on "The Progressive Tradition in American Politics" seeking to articulate the originations of the progressive worldview in America. This report points to the slow transformation of Woodrow Wilson into a national progressive president as what "solidified progressivism within the Democratic Party." CAP also notes that "the most distinctive progressive faction" happened to be "within the Republican Party and most fiercely advocated by prominent voices such as Theodore Roosevelt and Robert La Follette of Wisconsin. (Both Roosevelt and La Follette formed outside Progressive Parties to promote progressive ideas after failing to transform the Republican Party from inside.)

CAP claims progressives were responsible for: the 8-hour work day and 40-hour work week, civil service tests to replace political patronage, worker's compensation for on-the-job accidents, national supervision of banks and the creation of a flexiblenational currency, unemployment insurance, regulation of the securities industry, prohibitions against child labor and workplace exploitations, federal insurance of bank deposits, the legal right of people to organize within labor unions and engage in, bans on speculative banking practices collective bargaining for fair wages and benefits, the constitutional right to vote, full legal equality, and the elimination, refinancing and foreclosure protections for home and farm owners of formal discrimination for women and minorities, national infrastructure including electrification, railways, airports, the graduated income and inheritance tax bridges and roads, and the Internet, protections against contaminated food and medicines, Social Security and Medicare to aid the elderly and Medicaid and CHIP to help low-income families and children, hundreds of millions of acres of protected wilderness areas, waterways, minimum wage laws and income support for the working poor and national parks, antimonopoly and anticompetitive regulations of corporations, public education, college loans and grants for students, and the GI Bill, direct elections of U.S. senators, direct primary elections of political candidates, and the initiative and referendum process in the states.

With a list like that, it's not hard to figure out what a progressive might stand for: workers' rights, unions, bank regulations, social programs, equality, the building and re-building of infrastructure, economic protections, antitrust laws and the abolition of corporate personhood, and the strengthening of democracy. Ask yourself: How many of those issues do you hear Democratic Party members discussing openly? What in that list is taboo to the interests and campaigns of Democratic Party politicians either because they fear Republicans will out-message them or they will alienate interests they must court in order to be re-elected?

If that's what progressives stand for, then progressives should be ready and willing to go out and sell their visions for the future to the people of America. According to an April 2010 Gallup poll, support for regulating Wall Street banks was at 50%. A poll conducted as part of Gallup's annual Work and Education survey in August of 2009 found that "48% of Americans now approving of unions" (and while that represented the first sub-50% approval since Gallup first asked the question in the 1930s" that could easily be reversed if there was more defense of unions in this country by political leaders). A 2009 New York Times/CBS poll found that "59% [of Americans] say the government should provide national health insurance, including 49% who say such insurance should cover all medical problems."

Social Security continues to enjoy wide support (although President George W. Bush's push to privatize Social Security four years ago planted doubts in the minds of younger people). Another Gallup poll conducted in 2009 found 68% of Americans think major corporations should have less influence in this nation. A Pew Research Center poll from 2007 found a surge in support for the social safety net with 57% saying they were in favor of helping more needy even if debt would increase. (Interestingly, the poll found 48% of all conservatives were willing to accept deficit spending to help those who could not help themselves.).

In the face of conservative, libertarian, and free enterprise/free market think tank campaigns perpetuated through media and by the politicians of this country, the levels of support for "progressive" ideas and programs, which progressives started, is still high. Those who believe in these "progressive" ideals now need to speak to Americans about progressivism in a way that will lead them to support such a democratic, socially responsible, and much more egalitarian agenda.

A big problem is Democrats' failure to connect the reality they and others are experiencing to the reality the Obama Administration is perpetuating. Gallup published a poll on July 16th that showed Democrats' score on Gallup's Economic Confidence Index at -14 (down from -3 in June and +3 in April) yet no "meaningful change" in approval of President Obama. Such a disconnect may be conscious to Democrats --- perhaps, deep down they no longer wholeheartedly support Obama but say so publicly to not get lumped in with Tea Partiers. Whatever the case may be, progressivism cannot become more understood and rise in popularity and support if what the Obama Administration has done or failed to do is not connected to the situations we all face in society today.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Kevin Gosztola is a writer and curator of Firedoglake's blog The Dissenter, a blog covering civil liberties in the age of technology. He is an editor for OpEdNews.com and a former intern and videographer for The Nation Magazine.And, he's the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

We Do Not Consent to Warrantless "Porno-Scanning" in Airports

Do They Put Lipstick on Pigs at the Funny Farm?

How Private Prison Corporations Hope Arizona's SB1070 Will Lead to Internment Camps for Illegals

Why the Battle Against TSA Groping and Body Scanners is Justified

Give Obama a Chance to Do What?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
17 people are discussing this page, with 43 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
of progressives ideas- they are afraid of their ma... by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:06:10 AM
They despise movements for economic emancipation i... by Kevin Gosztola on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:14:45 AM
that the masters desspise US, the people. What the... by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:30:41 AM
and which leaders (not necessarily political ones)... by Margaret Bassett on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:32:42 PM
Martin Luther King Jr.Sargeant ShriverPaul Wellsto... by Terry Adcock on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:08:13 PM
Two are dead, one is very old and no longer a play... by Maxwell on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:28:17 PM
And whose daughter is married to a conservative Go... by Maxwell on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30:22 PM
Remember, Ms. Bassett asked, "...which leaders (no... by Terry Adcock on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:13:26 PM
If you have ever been put in charge of something t... by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:57:27 PM
I agree 100%. Educating the voter is absolutely ne... by ssg13565 on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:17:13 PM
...you didn't mention peace-making initiatives. Th... by Terry Adcock on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:03:28 PM
However, that was not "my list" but rather the Cen... by Kevin Gosztola on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:12:44 AM
...for calling it "your" list. I meant the list de... by Terry Adcock on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:24:55 AM
I'd like to get down to specifics but yeah, let's ... by Kevin Gosztola on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:57:06 PM
"after the left allowed conservatives to turn "li... by Maxwell on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:23:49 PM
...self-deluded Democrats cling to the misconcepti... by Joe Giambrone on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:24:58 PM
The Green party is also a failure for some of the ... by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:54:01 PM
What do you think the demise of the Tea Party will... by Kevin Gosztola on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:20:34 PM
We need the Green party to organize. I agree 100%.... by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:31:53 PM
Ralph Nader has no problem with running in 2012 an... by Kevin Gosztola on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 7:13:43 PM
Look what has been accomplished in just 1.5 years;... by Peter Wedlund on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:22:34 PM
Government cannot run things like banks, the auto ... by Stephen Smith on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:19:30 PM
Sadly right now, the cartels ARE running the econo... by Terry Adcock on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:04:49 PM
I didn't mean to imply that we should leave it up ... by Stephen Smith on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:22:14 PM
In order to make this incorrect comment, you have ... by Terry Adcock on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:24:36 PM
I defy you to cite ONE SINGLE example ofa governme... by Stephen Smith on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:04:32 PM
Have you noticed anything interesting in common ab... by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:44:01 PM
This really isn't accurate. The mini USB connector... by greg4constitution on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:37:13 AM
We had over 20 years of cell phones with no standa... by Steven Leser on Friday, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:37:36 AM
The Dem and Rep parties/admins/structures run noth... by richard on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:18:58 PM
every article that says "if any mention has been m... by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:20:43 PM
I imagine you find great comfort within your fanta... by richard on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:34:26 PM
comments because they are usually as articulate, c... by NettieMae on Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:48:58 PM
The charade. A functional representative governmen... by mikel paul on Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:19:44 PM
"As we love to point our fingers at historical mat... by Kevin Gosztola on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:57:36 AM
When you mention the building and re-building of i... by Tony Bartoletti on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:39:21 AM
Another reason the Democrats aren't promoting prog... by Perry Logan on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 5:36:54 AM
Your comment leaves out the reality that Republica... by Kevin Gosztola on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:00:36 AM
...called the Democratic Party, what would make yo... by Terry Adcock on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:07:58 AM
Kevin Gostolashared with us an impressive list of ... by Daniel Penisten on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:40:25 PM
Then, in the list of what Progressivism "stands fo... by Daniel Penisten on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:09:40 PM
I have to say, again, as I did above in the commen... by Kevin Gosztola on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:53:18 PM
To what do you refer? In the past year or so, for ... by Tony Bartoletti on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:02:02 PM