Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
16 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Personal Responsibility Deniers, Moochers, Takers, Self-Proclaimed Victims, Welfare Queens, Public Teat Suckers, Unite!

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to None 11/21/12
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

opednews.com

This is a call to action. We have a problem - the fake "Social-Security-Is-Going-Bankrupt!" problem.

Politicians, pundits, and policy wonks falsely claim that Social Security is going-bankrupt-now!, adding-to-the-deficit!, and destroying the Futures-of-Our-Children-and-Our-Children's-Children! They argue for "reforming" Social Security, by which they mean cutting benefits. Other politicians, et al. dignify this malarkey by treating it as if it merited consideration. Some examples:

This exchange, during the 10/11/12 vice presidential candidates' debate, between moderator and ABC journalist Martha Raddatz, and vice presidential candidate Representative Paul Ryan (R-WI):

Martha Raddatz: Both Medicare and Social Security are going broke and taking a larger share of the budget in the process. Will benefits for Americans under these programs have to change for the programs to survive, Mr. Ryan?

Representative Ryan: Absolutely. Medicare and Social Security are going bankrupt. These are indisputable facts.

The Simpson-Bowles Commission's deficit reduction "plan," which proposed a combination of cuts that would reduce the average annual Social Security benefit for middle-income workers by up to 35 percent. (Note: There is no official Commission plan because only 11 of the Commission's 18 members voted to endorse their own work, three short of the 14 needed to send it to Congress.)

Social Security recipients are not cheating future hard-working, tax-paying, by-the-rules-playing citizens, as some people seem to suggest. Rather, cuts proponents are proposing to cheat future benefit recipients by raiding Social Security. People who say otherwise are being poopy-heads, and here is why:

1)     Social Security doesn't contribute one penny to the deficit, and is prohibited from doing so by law.

2)     Social Security benefits 56 million Americans, and keeps 20 million people out of poverty.

3)     Social Security's surplus in 2011 was $2.7 trillion; it can operate at current benefit levels for at least 20 years -- without any "reforms."

These are indisputable facts.

If ever there was a time to expand Social Security's capacity to protect the "average citizen and his family against " poverty-ridden old age," as FDR said, it is now.  Yet we are told that Social Security is in crisis and needs immediate cuts so that it will "be there for people who need it"   several generations from now, that we must remember The Children, etc.

Translation: If I (a Baby Boomer under 55) insist on receiving the uncut Social Security benefits I have earned and will need to avoid poverty, a Terrible Burden could be visited on The Children 40-some years from now.  Motivated by guilt and a sense of urgency, I am supposed to happily forfeit my benefits - right away. (Unless I act now, I might realize something: If reformed Social Security benefits no longer cover my rent and food, it is my children who will feel obligated to pay for these essentials -- while also paying for their kids' child care, saving for college tuition, and who knows what else.)   

Remember the 2011 protests that shifted the national policy focus from the deficit to the destitute and near-destitute? It's time to protest again. We need to call out politicians who continue to insist that during the worst recession in 50 years, they need seniors' stay-out-of-poverty money to pay down a debt largely due to tax cuts for the rich. We need to call out people who pit our needs against our children's.

Picture this: Throughout December, voters show up at their U.S. senators' and representatives' offices, daily, to demand Social Security benefit increases. Senators and representatives are deluged with emails, letters, and phone calls, all advocating this same position. At town hall meetings and other public events, they are urged to increase benefits. When they go downtown, they are greeted by demonstrators demanding more benefits. Each time they check the news, there's another letter to the editor, op-ed, or interview, about increasing Social Security benefit levels.

If they don't hear us, we turn up the volume. Local senior groups*, Occupy chapters, and others who care about seniors join forces and:

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.lisaarnoldconsulting.com

For 25 years, Lisa has worked for and with nonprofits, sharing her expertise in organizing, fund raising, and community outreach. Organizing: Lisa has worked as a community, tenant, and labor organizer, on both local-level and statewide (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Personal Responsibility Deniers, Moochers, Takers, Self-Proclaimed Victims, Welfare Queens, Public Teat Suckers, Unite!

The Sequester Saga - Why We Need "Entitlement Reform" Reform (and How to Do It)

Post-Holiday-Debrief in a "Recovering" Economy

Time for Lady Liberty to Come Clean

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I can't believe that in a country with so much wea... by Lisa Arnold on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:15:22 PM
How can these people, with a straight face, tell p... by Textynn N on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:36:57 PM
"scam" is a great way to describe the cuts!... by Lisa Arnold on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:44:47 PM
For years Social Security contributions provided a... by BFalcon on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:14:02 PM
Social Security is a pay-as-you-go system. It alwa... by Joe Reeser on Thursday, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:37:22 PM
For a clear explanation of Social Security's non-r... by Lisa Arnold on Friday, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:21:17 AM
...needs to do some research. When Social Security... by Joe Reeser on Saturday, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:39:37 PM
A couple of points.1) A "cure" for poverty, yes or... by janet O'Connell on Friday, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:04:09 AM
1) If you need a 'cure' every month, were you ever... by Joe Reeser on Saturday, Nov 24, 2012 at 6:01:20 PM
... do you tear down the barn, or put a lock on th... by Jim Arnold on Monday, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:05:30 AM
"Any FICA revenue not used to pay benefits in the ... by Jim Arnold on Friday, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:17:40 AM
...is a theft, not that you would agree. Your 'but... by Joe Reeser on Saturday, Nov 24, 2012 at 6:18:58 PM
Mr. Reeser shared with us: "Social Security is a p... by Daniel Penisten on Friday, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:59:26 PM
Every penny used to pay SS benefits in any fiscal ... by Joe Reeser on Saturday, Nov 24, 2012 at 6:14:12 PM
Thanks for sounding the alarm on this critical iss... by Tom McDonald on Thursday, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:57:31 PM
thanks for reading the article!... by Lisa Arnold on Friday, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:09:44 PM