Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  3
Share on Facebook
  43
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 46 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Party Opposition is Not Civil War

Become a Fan
  (6 fans)
By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Today, politics in our nation is waged like war.   Many observe that politics is pursued with the scorched earth strategy of war where the objective is to annihilate the opposition.   But if we are to prosper as one nation, if we desire to end our undeclared civil war, then we must come to a new understanding of party and the idea of opposition.

Polarity:   Fracture or Complement  

  It is common in political-speak today to describe our nation as "polarized."   In an article entitled "Five Things We Learned on Election Night" CNN editor Paul Steinhauser wrote:

"The 2012 presidential election shattered spending records, further polarized a divided country and launched a thousand hashtags"."

But what does polarity really mean? Are opposite poles complements like "male and female," or do they represent irreconcilable contradictions?  

The description of polarity imbedded in the quote has within it a view of polarity as irreconcilable differences or "fracture" as I have begun to call it.   The concept of "fracture" is introduced and thoroughly discussed in my article entitled:   "Law, Truth, Meaning and Lies: A Metaphysical View of Berea College v. the Commonwealth of Kentucky."      

Berea College   

Jim Crow was instituted in the United States at the turn of the century.    Jim Crow laws were intended to reverse the achievements of the Civil War and institute in the place of slavery, a structure of second class citizenship for the former American slaves.  

The State of Kentucky adopted a set of Jim Crow laws in the early 1900's and then began their enforcement.   The aim was to segregate whites from blacks.   The tool was to make illegal certain associations between whites and blacks.   The Berea College case was Jim Crow applied to higher education.   The college was required by the new law to stop teaching whites and blacks together.    

Berea College organized under the General Laws of Kentucky in 1859. Thus, at the time when the State of Kentucky indicted the school (1904), whites and blacks had been attending school together since the school's inception -- approximately 45 years.

The article asserts a few essential concepts.  First:

"Laws, legal argument, and legal analysis all exist by making distinctions"....that traditional legal analysis creates distinctions by creating conceptual oppositional pairs: like the public/private distinction. This is how meaning is created."

In other words, lawyers from law school forward, deal with "oppositional pairs" like the "public v. private" distinction.   We discover that these oppositions are necessary to create meaning and eventually final outcomes.   We work with them on a daily basis our entire careers.   Most of the time we arrive at "meaning" and/or "results" by balancing these pairs of opposites.    But sometimes -- like in the case of Berea College -- the opposing concepts do not achieve their ends via a process of balancing.   Instead they achieve their ends via a process I have called "fracture."

Polarization that balances is the polarization of complementarity: like male and female.   But a polarization that separates and annihilates is a polarization of fracture: like white/black segregation.  About polarization that fractures I wrote:     

  ""....Fracturing, then, is a process of privileging through polarization where the polarizing process is somehow taken to the extreme.   It is this extreme polarization--stretching the rubber band beyond its bounds until it breaks--that creates the fracturing of the relationship.    Extreme polarization destroys.   The method utilized is to destroy the form (oppositional pair) and thereby achieve a destruction of substance."

Republicans vs. Democrats: Freedom, Unity, Party and Purpose  

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.ezlight.wordpress.com

Eric Z. Lucas is an alumnus of Stanford University (Creative Writing Major: 1972-1975), the University of Washington (1981: BA English Literature and Elementary Education) and Harvard Law School, J.D. 1986. Since law school he has been a public (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Redefining Citizenship Can End the War on Drugs

Create the Compassionate Society

Incognito versus Wooden: The Mythology of Ruthlessness

Richard Sherman:"...A Little Further Than Football"

True Service

A Culture of Work: A Social Justice Response

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The technique of fracture has been used before in ... by Eric Lucas on Sunday, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:41:40 PM