Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
22 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Palin's "Living Language' Gaffe Fells Fundamentalism

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Funny 3   Well Said 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 7/21/10
Become a Fan
  (24 fans)

opednews.com

By Robert S. Becker July 21, '10

If Palin were aware of the world outside her head, she'd have quit on "refudiate" before committing a more serious theological blunder. Unless attention and celebrity solely define your notion of brassy cleverness or career advancement.

There's something to be said, aside from "you can't fix stupid," about marching backwards but never retreating. It's a calamity William Osler summarized some years ago, "The greater the ignorance, the greater the dogmatism."

Palin was stuck, hesitant to admit only a typo turned "repudiate" into "refudiate." She had used the same non-word on FOX when attacking the president regarding NAACP charges of Tea Party racism. But when you stridently defend a howler, invoking no lesser being than Shakespeare, you make things worse. Adults then think your "mistakes" are not about spelling but intelligence or literacy, the ability to use a dictionary, even basic communication etiquette, more damning than any typo.

The inability to admit even tiny errors raises the worst case of all: the total inability to admit error, thus defaulting to delusions of infallability. Yes, yes, I know, living saints don't make errors so they don't have to admit what never happens.

Undermining Biblical Literalism

But now, she's really done it, coming with up a viable theory of language that, when implications come forth, should cause an evangelical firestorm. By positing English is a "living language," doesn't Palin "refudiate" the core assumption on which fundamentalist literalism depends, the key to her quaint version of distorted Christianity? Whether unconscious or oblivious subversion, admitting language is living, especially in the trivial pursuit of being defensive, is not where any born-again charismatic wants to go.

If language is "living," then sinful speakers continually distort the pure original. Then, as language evolves, what gets created dooms literalist notions: ambiguity that mandate periodic interpretations. That elevates the enemy of linguistic literalism: history and context, which every linguist worth his/her salt acknowledges informs ultimate meaning, intention, and function.

So, now, we have both a language and religious free-for-all: everyone can make it up as they go along. No word, no blunder, no confusion is against the rules, for there aren't any. Even if bodily dangers result. Any cop devoted to Palinese, having stopped you for a missing back light, yells, "Don't move or I'll shoot," when he simply means, "Don't mope or I'll scoot." Practically the same notions.

I tell you: make Palinese the national language and civilization will truly descend, even faster than were she to become president. Project her White House instructions during wartime: "don't shoot if you see the whites of their skin," or is that "kin" or is that "shoot up." Or "don't sh*t . . . " whatever. If it's good enough for Palin's "living English," it's everyone for herself.

Freedom Can Be Overdone

Further, is English the only "living language" for Palin how about the Aramaic Jesus spoke, or the Hebrew, Latin, and Greek that carried the history of the Jews (and the Gospel) into her inspired Biblical English? If the Bible is the literal word of God, then it is the perfect word of God, thus immune from personal whims and vagaries. Or is the language of the Bible not "alive," some special museum variety fixed like ancient monuments (though these still get re-interpreted every generation)?

Of course, no one who studies language ever divorces actual texts, even in translation, from the source, the context, the history and people who create them to communicate. Here, Palin endorses the book-learned know-it-alls she regularly impugns. Literalism is impossible, whether in analyzing yesterday's chatter or holy books, mocking the nature of language, from farcical gestures or pig Latin to church Latin. Only those justifying their faith with absurdly fixated language theories believe any single word has one and only one meaning, that context and circumstance do not matter. Even numbers, fairly unambiguous symbols, mean more than one thing.

Belligerent Ignorance, The Rogue Model

So, badly-educated, contemptuous Sarah tosses off her defensive joke that she's following in Shakespeare's footsteps but in fact undermines the very key assumptions that drive her rightwing intolerance and ignorance. It couldn't happen to a nicer girl or a more absurd belief system. I mean, in no time I bet, fundamentalists will predict some force descending to earth, embracing his faithful and whisking them rapturously to Heaven without a moment to say goodbye to pets. Just imagine.

Not only can't you "fix stupid," as Ron White joked, but brashly unapologetic, chin-thrusting ignorance smashes its blunt cudgel against those who know more and know better. What if every sixth grader responded to their own bonehead errors the way Palin does: "I didn't break any rules because there aren't any: I only imitated Shakespeare, our greatest writer, and Sarah Palin, our greatest missionary-patriot."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Educated at Rutgers College (BA) and UC Berkeley (Ph.D, English) Becker left university teaching (Northwestern, U. Chicago) for business, founding and heading SOTA Industries, high end audio company from '80 to '92. From '92-02 he did marketing (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Summer in the GOP Asylum: "Who are these guys?"

Trickle-down Gulf Wreck-onomics

"Apocalypse Now' Vogue Engulfs Chicken Littles

Moses Kaput -- Rightwing Ten Commandments To Serve Looming Theocracy

"God Particle' Refudiates the Religious Right

Tea Party Palin Is Toast, Forfeiting Senate Supremacy While the GOP Romps

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

What a fabulous observation. If dogmatic blowhards... by Jack Flanders on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:26:06 PM
Actually, look at the words refute and repudiate. ... by Andre Ouellet on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:31:59 PM
Making up words, even portmaneau neologisms, is no... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:56:28 AM
She just did not admit who.Don't misunderestimate ... by Aurora on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 5:24:27 PM
to a brilliant article!... by Meryl Ann Butler on Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:14:44 AM
Adoring comments always accepted.RB... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:36:24 AM
Thank you Meryl :)Don't they have their own altern... by Aurora on Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:18:58 PM
The woman is aN IDIOT!Unfortunately, she has nothi... by Dennis Kaiser on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 7:12:48 PM
Dennis, I was flagged on another OEN forum for cal... by Recce1 on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:41:12 PM
I have no hatred for either Palin, Bush, Cheney, o... by Dennis Kaiser on Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:36:34 AM
Dennis,The other side of the coin with Rights on i... by Recce1 on Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:27:19 PM
animosity, I think. As I understand it, the animus... by Debbie Scally on Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:47:11 PM
Debbie,Your definition is an interesting alternate... by Recce1 on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:17:08 AM
Just no respect in terms of being a potential lead... by Dennis Kaiser on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:56:35 AM
Dennis, Palin may not be presidential material, bu... by Recce1 on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:43:22 PM
Name the lies..... she is a quitter, she spouts no... by Dennis Kaiser on Saturday, Jul 24, 2010 at 8:46:48 AM
Dennis, your pop psychology is quite puerile as is... by Recce1 on Saturday, Jul 24, 2010 at 8:57:48 PM
Palin's approach is not about being precise.......... by Ernest on Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:57:24 AM
The very idea that such a person can be taken seri... by Bill Cain on Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:34:17 AM
... I wish that people would just stop giving the ... by Debbie Scally on Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:41:14 PM
I think making fun of both Palin and her mindset i... by Robert S. Becker on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:13:13 AM
I have to agree with you.The way I look at it, all... by Debbie S on Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:38:04 PM