Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   18 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama's Missing the Opportunity the Banking Crisis Presents

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 3/23/09

Become a Fan
  (32 fans)

On Thursday, with the AIG-bonus scandal breaking, I found ideas –concerning Obama and the handling of the economic crisis—just tumbling out of me. I posted them as they came –on…-- some 3,000 words—and now I will attempt to order and condense them into a more coherent and manageable presentation.

I would love for my worries about Obama’s present course to be misguided. I’d love it because I’ve loved seeing this guy’s wisdom and genius and singing his praises more than seeing him making a serious mistake. I’d love it because the nation would be a whole lot better off if I’m wrong. And I’d love it because it seems increasingly clear that Obama has chosen his course and will be sticking with it.

But this is how it looks to me. And not just me.

These thoughts, the more free-flowing original form of which were written last Thursday at http://www.nonesoblind.org/blog/?p=2229, were partly sparked by a piece by E.J. Dionne about the need for Obama to get out in front of “populist anger.” In the ensuing days, a whole chorus of voices have been addressing such themes.

I hope we’re all wrong.

************************ 

There are two dimensions of this economic crisis: the technocratic dimension (how to get the system out of the ditch and back onto the road) and the “morality play” (how to deal with the forces of greed and corruption that drove the country –and the world—into this disaster).

Obama is, most unfortunately, in danger of blowing it on both accounts.

The Stakes: The stakes couldn’t be higher.

On the technocratic side: Obama evidently has great potential as a transformational president, but unless he is seen as successful in dealing with the economic crisis, the American people will not follow him on the rest of his agenda. And unless he solves the banking problem, he’ll not succeed with the banking problem.

On the “morality play” side: Obama has begun his presidency backed by enormous public respect and enthusiasm. But unless the American people continue to see him as on the right side of the issues they feel most strongly about, they will not continue to trust him. And as the AIG-bonus scandal shows, the American people feel strongly about the arrogance and greed and corruption so clearly on display with these bonuses.

The economic crisis is not just a threat to the Obama presidency, but is an enormous opportunity. The American people have far more intense passions –fear, outrage, need-- connected with this crisis than with any of the other issues that make up Obama’s agenda. Everyone feels deeply impacted by the economic breakdown, whereas only some feel any deep need with respect to the issues of education and health care and renewable energy.

The economic crisis therefore provides an opportunity for Obama to cement a more profound leader-follower relationship with the American people than virtually any other situation could have afforded him.

So, how Obama handles this crisis can truly either make or break his presidency.

Blowing It: The consensus seems to be gathering that Obama’s on the wrong track.

First, with respect to the technocratic dimension, he seems committed to the Geithner/Summers approach, which involves treating the main corporate actors as salvageable, and pouring more money into to the institutions and the hands that created the mess in the first place. Such economists as Krugman, Roubini, Kuttner, Baker, and Galbraith (and more and more others) see this as a) throwing good money after bad and, even worse, b) transferring money from the victims of this crisis (the American people generally) to the perpetrators.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Andy Schmookler, an award-winning author, political commentator, radio talk-show host, and teacher, was the Democratic nominee for Congress from Virginia's 6th District. He is the author of various books including The Parable of the Tribes: The (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Like Colbert? Article Plus Critique

Mel Gibson's Rant as Profound Clue

To Anti-Obamite Lefties: It Doesn't Matter If You're Right

How Important is the Loss of Friendship?

The Mystery of Obama's Relationship with Power

Power and Corruption: Just What Is Their Relationship?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

in which the financial crisis is addressed is the ... by Richard Mynick on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:45:39 AM
Thank you for your comment, Richard. I'd just l... by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:14:42 PM
How about just the facts? He chose Geithner as Sec... by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:04:53 PM
The Kool Aid is getting in the way of rational fac... by Michael Cavlan on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:46:45 PM
Time being short right now, Jersey Girl, I'll resp... by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:02:26 PM
Sorry Andrew. You can't have it both ways. Ei... by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:43:47 PM
COTO Was Right All Along. Even as we were screa... by Michael Cavlan on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:56:08 PM
Maybe you know enough, Jersey Girl, to warrant the... by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:00:47 PM
But didn't Obama approve of the 700 billion ba... by jersey girl on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:10:55 PM
But neither does that prove your prosecutorial cas... by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:36:17 PM
Firstly, Obama DID have a choice. He could have an... by jersey girl on Tuesday, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:41:10 AM
Firstly, Obama DID have a choice. He could have an... by jersey girl on Tuesday, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:05:21 AM
I am glad to leave it there, regarding Obama. R... by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:41:38 AM
If getting elected (e.g. to the presidency) requir... by jersey girl on Tuesday, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:34:16 AM
"That's the problem isn't it? Politicians are corr... by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:30:42 AM
if candidates like Kucinich were afforded the same... by jersey girl on Tuesday, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:50:58 AM
The American people got to see plenty enough of Ku... by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:30:17 PM
which it to continue business as usual, with his "... by Stanimal on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:04:21 PM