This religious, cultish element is integral to a report done for the U.S. Department of Energy in 1984 by Battelle Memorial Institute about how the location of nuclear waste sites can be communicated over the ages. An "atomic priesthood," it recommends, could impart the locations in a "legend-and-ritual"retold year-by-year." Titled "Communications Measures to Bridge Ten Millennia," the taxpayer-funded report says: "Membership in this "priesthood' would be self-selective over time." http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1828&dat=19841115&id=4C0oAAAAIBAJ&sjid=XL4EAAAAIBAJ&pg=1115,9428066
Currently, Allison Macfarlane, nominated to be the new head of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, says she is an "agnostic" on nuclear power--as if support or opposition to atomic energy falls on a religious spectrum. http://atomicinsights.com/2012/06/transcript-of-atomic-show-61-allison-macfarlane-atomic-agnostic-june-15-2007.html Meanwhile, Gregory Jaczko, the outgoing NRC chairman, with a Ph.D. in physics, was politically crucified because he repeatedly raised safety concerns, thus not revering nuclear power enough.
Years ago, while I was working on a book about toxic chemicals, the publisher asked that I find someone who worked for a chemical company and get his or her rationale. I found someone who had been at American Cyanamid, the pesticide manufacturer, who said he worked there to better support his growing family financially.
But when it comes to nuclear power, it's more than that--it's a religious adherence. Why? Does it have to do with nuclear scientists and engineers being in such close proximity to power, literally? Is it about the process through which they are trained--in the U.S., many in the nuclear navy and/or in the insular culture of the government's national nuclear laboratories? These laboratories, originally under the Atomic Energy Commission and now the Department of Energy and managed by corporations, universities and scientific entities including Battelle Memorial Institute, grew out of the World War II Manhattan Project crash program to build atomic bombs. After the war, the laboratories expanded to pursue the development of all things nuclear. And is it about nuclear physics programs at universities serving as echo chambers?
Whatever the causes, the outcome is nuclear worship.
And this is despite the Chernobyl or Fukushima Daiichi catastrophes. It's despite the radioactive messes exposed at the Rocky Flats nuclear weapons production facility and at Los Alamos and other national nuclear laboratories most of which have been declared high-pollution Superfund sites where cancer on-site and in adjoining areas is widespread. It's despite the continuing threat of nuclear war and the horrific loss of life it would bring and nuclear proliferation spreading the potential for atomic weapons globally. Still, they press on with religious fervor.
"Most of them are not educated about radiation biology or genetics, so they are fundamentally ignorant," says Dr. Helen Caldicott, a founder of Physicians for Social Responsibility whose books include Nuclear Madness. "They are "brought up' in an environment where they are conditioned to support the concept of all things nuclear." Further, "nuclear power evokes enormous forces of the universe, and as Henry Kissinger said, "Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac." And "they practice denial because I think many of them in their heart really know that what they are doing is evil but they will defend it assiduously, unless they themselves or their child is diagnosed with cancer. Then many of them recant."
Linking the "nuclear priesthood" to the Manhattan Project is Michael Mariotte, executive director of Nuclear Information and Resource Service. "The scientists involved weren't really sure what they were unleashing, and had to have a certain amount of faith that it would work and it would not destroy the world in the process. After they saw the destructive power of the bomb, they were both proud and horrified at what they had done, and believed they had to use this technology for "good.' Thus nuclear power was born," says Mariotte. "The problem is when you have this messianic vision that you are creating good out of evil, it is very difficult to turn around and realize that the "good' you have created is, in fact, also evil."
Kevin Kamps, radioactive waste watchdog at Beyond Nuclear, says ever since the first test of an atomic device, "the diabolically-named "Trinity' atomic blast, when Manhattan Project scientists placed bets on whether or not it would ignite the Earth's atmosphere, it's been clear something pathological afflicts many in the "nuclear priesthood.' Perhaps it's a form of "Faustian fission'--splitting the atom gave the U.S. superpower status with the Bomb and then over a 100 commercial atomic reactors, so the "downsides' have been entirely downplayed to the point of downright denial. Perhaps the power, prestige and greed swirling around the "nuclear enterprise' explains why so many in industry, government, the military, and even apologists in academia and mainstream media, engage in Orwellian "Nukespeak' and monumental cover ups".The "cult of the atom' has caused untold numbers of deaths and disease downstream, downwind, up the food chain, and down the generations from "our friend the atom' gone bad."
A parallel situation exists in Russia, the other nuclear superpower. Dr. Alexey Yablokov, a biologist, member of the Russian Academy of Sciences and environmental advisor to Presidents Yeltsin and Gorbachev, says the nuclear scientists there refer to themselves "atomschiky" or "nuclearists" and "think and act as a separate, isolated caste." From the beginning of nuclear technology in the Soviet Union, they "were enthusiastic about the great, the fantastic discoveries of splitting the atom and developing enormous power. This "secret knowledge' was magnified by state secrecy and a deep belief--in the Soviet Union as in the United States--of atomic energy "saving the globe'"There is a remarkable similarity in the argumentation of these groups here and in the United States. Step-by-step, they turned to an atomic religion, closed societies, a "state inside a state.'"
Dr. Heidi Huttner, who teaches sustainability at Stony Brook University, explains: "As in so many parts of our industrialized and mechanized culture, there is no thought of consequences, or connections to the larger web of science, health, and human and nonhuman life"The nuclear culture becomes absolutely caught up in its own language and story. This self-enclosure feeds, validates and perpetuates itself. Without an outside critique or 'objective' third eye, any such culture loses the ability to self-regulate and self-monitor. This is where things become dangerous."
Russell Ace Hoffman, author of The Code Killers, Why DNA and Ionizing Radiation Are a Dangerous Mix, says: "It is a cult. It fits all the classic definitions of a cult. It's an elitist, war-mongering, closed society of inbred, inwardly-thinking, aggressively xenophobic, arrogant pseudo-nerds stuck in ideas that are at least half a century out of date"Another cult-like behavior is they don't care about the suffering of their victims. Not one bit."
Dr. Barbara Rose Johnston, an anthropologist and senior research fellow at the Center for Political Ecology in Santa Cruz, recounts spending three days at a U.S. Department of Energy-sponsored conference for people involved in the atmospheric monitoring program at the nuclear weapons test site in Nevada. "Many of the scientists and technicians in attendance were from southern Utah and St. Georges County area where the heaviest atomic fallout from the Nevada test site occurred"I did not find a single man who saw a connection between fallout and cancer rates, despite the fact that most had suffered. My initial reaction was that these folks truly "drank the Kool-Aid'--true believers through and through."
"The nuclear industry requires buying into an orthodoxy," explains nuclear engineer Arnie Gunderson. "I know, as I was in it as a senior VP." He tells of how, after he voiced concerns and criticism, an industry lawyer "told me, "Arnie, in this industry, you are either for us or against us, and you just crossed the line.' The same thing happened to [outgoing NRC Chairman] Jaczko I know of one nuclear engineer with 40 years of experience who committed suicide five days after Fukushima because he simply could not accept that his life's work was based on erroneous assumptions. He had worked on the Mark 1 design [the GE design of the Fukushima Daicchi plants]."
Alice Slater, New York representative of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, says the "nuclear scientists are out of touch with reality. They talk about 'risk assessment'--as though the dreadful, disastrous events at Chernobyl and Fukushima are capable of being weighed on a scale of "risks and benefits.' They're constantly refining their nuclear weapons--Congress has budgeted $84 billion for over the next 10 years to maintain the "'reliability of the nuclear arsenal,' and $100 billion for new 'delivery systems'--missiles, submarines and airplanes. After the horrendous effects on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, everyone knows these catastrophic weapons are unusable and yet we're pouring all this money into perpetuating the national nuclear weapons laboratories. They're not including the Earth in their calculations and the enormous damage they are doing. They're involved in the worst possible inventions with lethal consequences that last for eternity. Still, they continue on. They're holding our planet hostage while they tinker in their labs
1 | 2