Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

No Surprises Yet from Wall Street's President

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to None 3/23/09

It sure is "horrifying"--to use Paul Krugman's word--that Obama will not seize
those foundering banks, but is instead proposing to blow billions of our money on their toxic assets, far in excess of the latters' worth.

It's horrifying, but it shouldn't be surprising, considering Wall Street's long investment in Barack Obama.

Way back in the spring of 2007, that presidential hopeful outdid all the other candidates at raising money from the employees of Wall Street's top investment banks:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/17/AR2007041701688.html


By June of 2008, the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) was noting that "Wall Street seems to have selected Barack Obama for its own major investment this election cycle":

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/06/wall-street-bets-on-obama-for.html


And here's a fascinating tidbit about one bank in particular: UBS, the Swiss behemoth that lost billions when that huge stink-bomb of subprime mortgages exploded. "For reasons noone can fathom, UBS of Switzerland decided that it had a larger appetite for mortgage-related instruments than any other bank in the world," reported MSN.com three weeks before Election
Day. "Its balance sheet became obese with the junk and forced it to take what seemed like a write-off a week. UBS has fired so many people that it is surprising it still has someone to man the switchboard."

http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topstocks/archive/2008/10/16/ubs-crisis-global-bank-trouble-is-getting-worse.aspx

So it's worth noting here that Team Obama got over $1 million from UBS Americas, whose top dog was quite smitten by the candidate when they sat down to chat: "When I sat down with him, I found him to be unbelievably refreshing and smart and thoughtful," gushed CEO Robert Wolf:

http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/feb2008/db20080212_645487.htm

(Last month, Wolf was appointed to the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, to lend a hand to Geithner, Summers and the other "centrists" tasked with cleaning up the very mess they helped to make.)

                                  2.


So here's another reason why Barack Obama won the last election--aside from his charisma, the absurd opposing ticket, the unprecedented turnout, and the extraordinary vigilance of the election monitors (and, as I and others have reported in detail, the last-minute deposition of Mike Connell, and Karl Rove's consequent decision not to steal that contest, too).

Obama/Biden also won because Wall Street was now pushing for the Democrats to win the White House, which marked a big reversal of their prior practice. Thus Obama was a candidate of "change"--and so was Hillary Clinton, the two of them receiving most of the Big Money poured forth in that race (the most expensive presidential contest ever run).

According to the CRP, the top campaign donor corporation in 2008--that is, the biggest donor to all candidates--was Goldman Sachs (at least $5 million), followed by Citigroup ($4.2 million), then J.P. Morgan Chase ($4.1 million). The industry association that donated most was the National Association of Realtors ($3.2 million):

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/10/us-election-will-cost-53-billi.html


Now, certainly Obama also got a lot of dough, in small donations, from people just like you and me. But We the People weren't the primary engine moving his campaign. True, 48% of his donations were under $200--but 43% were over $2300, while 10% were for $4600, the maximum amount allowable.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Mark's new book, Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008, a collection 14 essays on Bush/Cheney's election fraud since (and including) 2000, is just out, from Ig Publishing. He is also the author of Fooled Again: The Real Case for Electoral Reform, which is now out in paperback (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

This bill will kill small farms, and wreck our food supply

Scott Walker Goes To Chicago, Gets His Mic Checked! (Must-See)

Notorious Saudi prince is Fox News Corp's 4th-largest voting shareholder

Was Prop 8 Actually Defeated??

Peter B. Collins going off the air

Obama won by MILLIONS MORE than we've been told

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
 this remark......."In politics, nothing... by Ernest on Tuesday, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:24:06 AM
This s.o.b. didn't give a crap what we thought... by Mr M on Tuesday, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:34:52 AM
Every President since Wilson has been "Wall S... by William Whitten on Tuesday, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:01:04 PM
The size of this emergency is such that it:Is gett... by kwalsh on Tuesday, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:17:06 PM