Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

"My Country Right or Wrong"; NO! If it's Wrong, Then Make it Right"

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Must Read 2   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 8/1/12

Become a Fan
  (85 fans)


Dissent by 123rf.com

Americans watch as their nation and its government continues to undergo a radical transformation that began at the turn of the new century; they see a grossly incompetent government that is allowing this country and its democracy to rapidly deteriorate; one that has become enslaved by the money, power and influence of the masters of Corporatism. And while this treachery is going on, millions of Americans still cling to the belief of "My country right or wrong."

"My country right or wrong." Does that mean that no matter what this government of ours does, no matter how unconscionable, unjustifiable or illegal its policies and actions in this country or around the world may be, that 313 million Americans have a sacred duty to accept and condone all of them without any objection or resistance? Well, now; that seems to be in direct opposition to Thomas Jefferson who said it best: "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." So during these very trying times should we readily accept whatever our government does, no matter how egregious the acts may be or, rather, react by expressing our dissent in meaningful, constructive ways?

While "My country right or wrong" is very commonly used in situations where the people of America desire to show their solid support of their country and government, Carl Shurz, a general of the Union Army, many years ago, had a different take on that observation when he said: "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." And that's exactly what we Americans should be using as the basis for making judgments of our government's behavior and actions.

So, with this in mind, let's try to analyze and understand how and why the people of America currently react, or fail to react, to what their government is doing. In my observations I have seen three separate kinds of reactions, ranging from complete indifference to blind support to a combination of dissent and constructive alternatives.

The first segment of this society includes those people who want no part of the political process, hold it in contempt, and do not vote in any election, either local or national. They take no time to study the issues and educate themselves; they can see what is going on, know that conditions in America are deteriorating but have no reaction and concentrate on what's happening in their own lives. They could care less about this nation's many problems. We can conclude that there is nothing much that can be done to involve these people in our democratic process and to continue to try is a complete waste of time; they just don't care.

The next segment of this society includes those many millions of Americans who don't have much use for this government, disagree with many of its actions, think it's too big, creates too many regulations, and is totally corrupted. But they still grudgingly accept and support anything and everything it does. They don't really like the endless wars but, then again, good Americans must support their troops and their government even when the nation's wealth and resources are being wasted in building a world military empire. As I see it, this very large group includes Republicans, Democrats, Independents and others of various political persuasions.

Why is it that so many Americans who may strongly object to what their government is doing just go along with it and accept what they believe to be wrong? It is entirely possible that they are caught up or locked in a state of denial. They know that, on many important matters, it's their government that is doing wrong but it's still their country. So, the reality of such a situation can become so intense and so painful that it must be dismissed and ejected from one's mind; that's what's called simple denial in which an individual totally denies the unwelcome facts and stays fully supportive of their country.

Then there is another element of denial called minimization in which, for example, a person decides that these ongoing wars, while they may be troubling, may not be that big of a problem when one looks at the big picture, the security of this nation; that the many problems that this nation faces are not that bad, that corporations have no other choice but to eliminate jobs and ship them overseas; that our economy may be rapidly spiraling downward but that it will, without any doubt, rise again, as it always does, because of its all a part of the normal economic cycle.

And there is yet one more facet of denial that is present in America today. It's called projection and that's when the truth and the facts are both acknowledged but there is a denial of the responsibility of those who are clearly the cause of the problem or the illegal or immoral action. Many Americans still believe that G.W. Bush and Dick Cheney were entirely justified in conducting the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq; it was Saddam Hussein's fault because he fully intended to use his deadly weapons of mass destruction (none were ever found, they did not exist except in the minds of the war mongers) to directly attack America. That's denial taken to the highest degree.

Lastly we have that segment of this society that witnesses the same things that the first two groups of Americans do, that clearly judges certain, very specific government actions as being entirely wrong when measured by legal, ethical and moral standards, and then decides that if "My country is doing wrong, then I need to do everything in my power to make it right." And that's what they do; they object, they will not accept obvious wrongs when they see them, and a great many of them offer constructive recommendations as solutions to the problems.

They are the backbone of America but the problem is that there are just not enough of them. Just some of the progressive writers and activists in this group who are providing great leadership include the anti-war activist, David Swanson, together with Chris Hedges, Glenn Greenwald, Noam Chomsky, Ray McGovern and many of their counterparts who work tirelessly in the effort to stabilize this nation. And there are many nameless, dedicated Americans who are following the lead of these activists and are getting involved with trying to reform this government. All these Americans are following in the footsteps of Jefferson, the Father of patriotic dissent.

The meaning of honest dissent is clear; if you search your conscience and decide that what our government is doing is clearly illegal, unethical or immoral, then your duty to your country must be to speak out against it; but not only to speak out but to personally get involved in trying to find the ways to right the wrongs. These are the people in our society that have some fight left in them; those that are involved with the Occupy Movement around the country trying to highlight the most egregious sources of our problems such as Wall Street and Corporate America and working hard to find ways by which to combat their increasing control over this nation.

But try as they might, those that occupy this segment of the American society are fighting an uphill battle, one that sometimes seems to be totally futile. Right now they are carrying a heavy load in trying to inform and educate the mass of Americans to the dangers that this nation faces. This situation is almost like a modern-day civil war as these reformers have to go up against millions of their fellow Americans who are firmly entrenched within this government, the defense industry and portions of the business sector, and have no intention of joining any fight to disturb their own comfortable positions.

This reformist segment must find the ways to grow and become far more productive, to become even more vocal and greatly expand it influence throughout America. It may well be a very long and difficult task but this movement must find the ways to cleanse this government of the poisonous elements that have now established control over it. It must do away with that misguided notion of "My country right or wrong" and replace that with "If our country is wrong, then we must find the ways to make it right."

We must get to the point where the voices of the American people once again determine the direction in which this nation goes. If the overwhelming needs, concerns and opinions of the people continue to be quashed by this government then we the people will, one way or another, find rational, constructive ways to wrest that control away from those who believe they, and only they, possess it.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Michael Payne is an independent progressive activist. His writings deal with social, economic, political and foreign policy issues; and especially with the great dangers involved with the proliferation of perpetual war, the associated defense (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Orwell's "1984" becoming a reality in modern-day America

Heed the Warning Signs; America is Edging Ever Closer to a Societal Implosion

How Do You Spell Sociopath? G-O-P

The Beginning of the End for the U.S. Dollar as the World Reserve Currency

The Escalating War Within America: A House Divided

Barack Obama Has Severely Crippled His Presidency and the Democratic Party

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Does that mean that no matter what this gove... by michael payne on Wednesday, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:42:33 PM