Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   6 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

More Federal Judge Abdication

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Supported 4   Well Said 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 5/4/12

Become a Fan
  (110 fans)
The branch designed to be insulated from political pressures has been the most craven of all in the post-9/11 era


(Credit: World Can't Wait / CC BY 2.0 )

The abdication of U.S. federal judges in the post-9/11 era, and their craven subservience to Executive Branch security claims, has been a topic I've written about several times over the past couples of weeks. Yesterday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals adopted the argument of the Obama DOJ that John Yoo is -- needless to say -- fully immune from any and all liability for having authorized the torture of Jose Padilla, on the ground that the illegality of Yoo's conduct was not "beyond debate" at the time he engaged in it.

Everything I wrote a couple of weeks ago about the identical shielding of Donald Rumsfeld by federal courts and the Obama DOJ from similar claims applies to yesterday's ruling, and The New York Times has a good editorial today condemning this ruling as "misguided and dangerous."

In sum, this yet again underscores that of all the American institutions that have so profoundly failed in the wake of 9/11 to protect the most basic liberties -- Congress, both political parties, the establishment media, the Executive Branch, the DOJ specifically -- none has been quite as disgraceful as the federal judiciary, whose life tenure is supposed to insulate them from base political pressures that produce cowardly and corrupted choices. And yet, just consider these two facts:

(1) not a single War on Terror victim -- not one -- has been permitted to sue for damages in an American court over what was done to them, even when everyone admits they were completely innocent, even when they were subjected to the most brutal torture, and even when the judiciary of other countries permitted their lawsuits to proceed; and,

(2) not a single government official -- not one -- has been held legally accountable, either criminally or even civilly, for any War on Terror crimes or abuses; perversely, the only government officials to pay any price were the ones who blew the whistle on those crimes.

That is how history will record the behavior of American federal judges in the face of the post-9/11 onslaught of anti-Muslim persecution and relentless erosions of core rights.

Read this entire article at Salon.

 

For the past 10 years, I was a litigator in NYC specializing in First Amendment challenges, civil rights cases, and corporate and securities fraud matters. I am the author of the New York Times Best-Selling book, How Would A Patriot (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

HSBC, too big to jail, is the new poster child for US two-tiered justice system

US investigates possible WikiLeaks leaker for "communicating with the enemy"

Prosecution of Anonymous activists highlights war for Internet control

The myth of Obama's "blunders" and "weakness"

Are All Telephone Calls Recorded And Accessible To The US Government?

The Remarkable, Unfathomable Ignorance of Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
It's too bad that those Framers didn't provide any... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Friday, May 4, 2012 at 6:02:43 PM
AT THE CLOSE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION, a w... by BFalcon on Sunday, May 6, 2012 at 10:11:54 AM
what did you expect? John Yoo's criminal compatrio... by Douglas A. Wallace on Saturday, May 5, 2012 at 5:34:53 PM
After Bush Jr's first six years [ 2001 - 2006 ] in... by Lance Ciepiela on Sunday, May 6, 2012 at 9:43:15 AM
Since he is not receiving messages why would other... by BFalcon on Sunday, May 6, 2012 at 10:15:47 AM
Constitutional fabric. What place does a lifetime ... by Paul Repstock on Sunday, May 6, 2012 at 12:47:16 PM