Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
  14
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon
  172
Tell A Friend
  17
203 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
16 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Monsanto's Assault on Agriculture

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 10   Well Said 7   Valuable 7  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 3/11/09

opednews.com

Monsanto is a corporation reviled for its genetic tampering and attempts to seize control of agriculture around the world.  While trying to change its public persona into one of benevolence towards the public, the history of Monsanto is littered with continuous efforts to not only seize control of food production, but also supply.  Monsanto's history also includes lives destroyed either financially and/or physically as the result of its activities.

1969-2002 Source: Northern Illinois Business and Industry Data Center
 
Here in the US, Monsanto goon squads routinely trespass onto privately owned land, take samples of privately owned crops and then claim Monsanto's frankenseed crops are being grown illegally...their patents have been violated.  According to Monsanto, these are "unauthorized seeds."  Those two words are a harbinger of things to come and should give you an idea where all of this is headed.
 
Courts have ruled that if Monsanto's seeds sprout in a ditch near the uncontaminated natural crops of a farmer who refuses to grow GMO, the crop belongs to Monsanto along with fines and penalties. 
 
Monsanto attempts to minimize their harassment of non-participating farmers by saying that out of about 250,000 farmers they have only sued about 120.  Monsanto goes on to say that farmers will report other farmers who save seed, and that many of the tips they get about seed saving are from other farmers in the community.  I think the probability of this actually happening is slight and would tend to think more along the lines of the Goon Squads illegally trespassing and reporting; after all, that's what they get paid for.
 
On top of this, Monsanto came up with a new in-house rule after the fact, claiming they had not sold the seeds to the farmers but had merely leased the seeds to the farmer.   This was a de facto legal maneuver.  After all, if you SELL something, how it is used is no longer your business, it doesn't belong to you.  If you lease the same product, you now have continued interest in the use. 
 
Monsanto knows that genetic traits can be passed between grains or other plants either during handling and processing or as a result of pollination and that GMO transfers more readily than traditional seed.  As a result, they also know that genetic traits and makeup indicating the purity of any seed at this point in time is not achievable as a result of the contamination of traditional crops resulting from genetically altered crops being totally uncontrolled and uncontrollable.
 
Knowing that wind drift, bird droppings and other natural happenings would by necessity cause the contamination and cross pollination of natural crops with the genetically modified crops, Monsanto continued to push its malignant creations onto farmers who believed the hype that Monsanto's "authorized seeds" would increase productivity and increase profits.  The passing of time and the analysis of these claims tells a different story.
 
In the case of soybeans:

Roundup Ready Soybeans use two to five times more herbicides than non-GE Varieties.  When you add royalties, fees and other costs the resulting profit for the farmer is $0.  The increase in production is negligible and usually less than a traditional crop.  These crops also require 2 to 3 times more water to grow.
 
Then there's that problem with cotton (Excerpted from the original article at Global Research):

The cotton's agronomic performance is also erratic. When Monsanto's GM cotton varieties were first introduced in the US, tens of thousands of acres suffered deformed roots and other unexpected problems. Monsanto paid out millions in settlements. 

  •  [4] When Bt cotton was tested in Indonesia, widespread pest infestation and drought damage forced withdrawal of the crop, despite the fact that Monsanto had been bribing at least 140 individuals for years, trying to gain approval.

  •  [5] In India, inconsistent performance has resulted in more than $80 million dollars in losses in each of two states.

  • [6] Thousands of indebted Bt cotton farmers have committed suicide. In Vidarbha, in northeast Maharashtra, from June through August 2006, farmers committed suicide at a rate of about one every eight hours.

  •  [7] (The list of adverse reactions reported from other GM crops, in lab animals, livestock and humans, is considerably longer.) (end excerpt)

  • These are just two of the crops being devastated by genetic tampering and the attempts to lay claim to crops traditionally grown successfully without patents, tampering or alteration.
     
    Wherever Monsanto has inserted itself in agriculture, food supplies dwindle, become unaffordable or have devastating affects on human health.  Traditional and proven seed stocks are destroyed or forever contaminated with genetically altered material that can include everything from human DNA to that of numerous animals or many times unidentified genetic material.
     
    And about that Artic Seed Vault... as I asked before, if what Monsanto produces is so beneficial, if it in fact is far superior to traditional seeds, why was none of their mutated stock included in the Vault? 

    Maybe because it isn't fit for human consumption?
     
    (c) 2009 Marti Oakley

    First posted at The Proud Political Junkie's Gazette

     

    A new president but the same old crowd runs the Washington District of Criminals. We are under attack from all quarters by our own goverment. I have written for more years than I care to admit about the corruption of our government. At some (more...)
     
    Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

    The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

    Writers Guidelines

    Contact Editor

    Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

    Monsanto's Assault on Agriculture

    NAIS ALERT: H.R. 814 will make NAIS federal law

    Wisconsin's war against agriculture: Fines, imprisonment and property seizure

    States Claiming Ownership of Newborn's DNA

    Gardasil: Another killer vaccine from Merck

    Vaccines........How to create disease and genocide

    Comments

    The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

    This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

    Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
    15 people are discussing this page, with 16 comments
    To view all comments:
    Expand Comments
    (Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

    Check out this patent for GMO wheat:Monsanto paten... by Barbara Peterson on Wednesday, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:55:29 PM
    Monsanto is the War Criminal of Food. This company... by Rolland Miller on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:00:01 AM
    I agree 100%!!!... by Dave Hunter on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:40:01 AM
    Monkeying with genes is what eventually will make ... by Arktig Silver on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:01:43 AM
    Here in Alberta, appoximately 80% of the canola (r... by lwarman on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:41:25 PM
    your legal system is strange.  I would rule M... by shadow dancer on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 3:22:10 PM
    Monsanto’s assault on traditional agricultur... by Nathan Nahm on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:02:36 PM
    What happens when the heinously uninformed use con... by Monsanto Company on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:20:43 AM
    Garrett, at least Brad Mitchell from Monsanto sign... by Dee West on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:02:36 PM
    If so much joy is being expereinced by India's far... by Marti Oakley on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:06:03 PM
    This is Brad. There is no link between Bt cotton a... by Brad Mitchell on Monday, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:03:19 AM
    Vandana Shiva, a woman intimately involved with In... by Jennifer Hathaway on Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:35:07 AM
    Very timely article! Linn's article about the... by Marti Oakley on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:14:28 PM
    People are clearly wanting this information, and y... by Linn Cohen-Cole on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:38:51 PM
    What a ridiculous rant! How dare you talk about po... by Lee Cornell on Saturday, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:45:07 PM
    While I believe genetic modifications can improve ... by Ray Padgett on Tuesday, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:03:21 AM