Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
7 comments

General News

Obama's Unconstitutional NDAA 'Detained Indefinitely' by Federal Judge

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Valuable 3   News 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 9/12/12
Become a Fan
  (19 fans)

opednews.com


Worse than Bush on Civil Liberties? by gw

A federal judge permanently blocked enforcement of a law signed by Obama late last year that included vague language allowing the military to detain US citizens indefinitely.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest today ruled in favor of Chris Hedges and six other journalists in permanently blocking disputed provisions in the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act for 2012). Forrest placed a preliminary injunction against the law in May because...well, because of the U.S. Constitution. The government appealed then, prompting today's smack down. In part:

"The Constitution places affirmative limits on the power of the Executive to act, and these limits apply in times of peace as well as times of war"

The challenge to the NDAA came within two weeks, filed by a distinguished group of journalists including former New York Times reporter Christopher Hedges,  Noam Chomsky, Daniel Ellsberg and Jennifer "Tangerine" Bolan, noting that Section 1021(b) of the law allows detention of U.S. citizens and permanent residents without due process, and solely on "suspicion of providing substantial support" to al-Qaeda or others engaged in hostilities against the U.S.

Opposition lined up quickly on the left, including Michael Moore, Rachel Maddow, Glenn Greenwald, the ACLU, Johnathan Turley, Democracy Now, Mother Jones, The Young Turks, Naomi Wolf,  Katrina van den Heuval,  Ray McGovern and Matt Rothschild with critical reporting appearing on sites like  HuffingtonPost, FireDogLake, OpedNews, Truthout, Alternet, CommonDreams, Raw Story, DailyKos  and others.

The judicial response to the NDAA was fast and firm, siding with the plaintiffs in a 112 page ruling holding that the law's vague language needs immediate clarification because it endangers reporters or activists based simply on research, speech or associations that should be protected by the First Amendment.

Earlier this week, in Obama's Bush-Era Incoherence on Constitutionality of NDAA we argued the NDAA was making Obama unpopular with the left for his stances against constitutionally protected civil liberties. 

The administration's appeal could go forward, kicking the case up to a higher court, but government lawyers actually have claimed the power to indefinitely detain U.S. citizens captured in the United States  is not derived from the NDAA, but the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force.

A senior administration official told TPM that the NDAA "changes nothing" about the legal question long before today's injunction was held up, asking  "[c]ould a future administration hold a U.S. citizen in military detention? Yes, if the AUMF allowed it, but that would have been true with or without this bill."

"Whether you can pick up a U.S. citizen inside the United States and place them in military detention -- which was done in the Padilla case but was never resolved up to the Supreme Court -- we would argue still sort of an open legal question and is not answered by the NDAA, it's totally silent on that".

The "Terrorist" Ruse

Disturbing assertions were made by Lt. Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, the former chief of staff and counsel to Secretary of State Colin Powell, speaking about the NDAA and the suspension of posse comitatus we haven't seen since Reconstruction. Recalling J. Edgar Hoover's campaign to paint legitimate dissenters as communists, Wilkerson believes the authors of the NDAA are more concerned with the surging ranks of those in the Occupy movement than al Qaeda sleeper cells:

"I don't think they're doing this based on their fear of terrorists. I really think they're doing this based in their ultimate fear of the Occupy Wall Street -- cum -- other movements in this country which are going to deepen and become more profound in every city in this country if we do head into a depression, rather than a recession which, with Europe and our banks so heavily committed to each other, is looking more and more like the future. 

If that's the case, these people are hedging bets against their own people, by making their military a part of the force they will call out against their own people. And to me, that's heinous. Calling the Occupy Wall Street people terrorists is the next move, I mean, that's how you start this kind of stuff."

This would also explain the stealthy, fast-tracked passage of the Trespass Bill HR 347, making it a felony punishable by up to ten years in federal prison to protest anywhere certain government officials don't want you to. 

Next Page  1  |  2

 

(OpEdNews Contributing Editor since October 2006) Inner city schoolteacher from New York, mostly covering media manipulation. I put election/finance reform ahead of all issues but also advocate for fiscal conservatism, ethics in journalism and (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Limbaugh/Hannity Parent Company Admits Hiring Actors to Call Radio Shows

The #OWS Video Rupert Murdoch Doesn't Want You To See

LocalLeaks' Charges of Cover-Up by Parents, Police in Steubenville Rape Forces Official Response [Updated]

Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck Respond To Report That Parent Company Hires Actors for Call-ins

#OWS Cheers As Defiant Judge Stops Obama From Selling Immunity To Wall Street

Obama to Grant Banks Robosigning Immunity in Showdown With Breakaway AGs [Updated]

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

We can breathe again.... by Timothy Gatto on Thursday, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:49:08 AM
we need the AUMF repealed as well but one good thi... by Gustav Wynn on Thursday, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:37:55 AM
" Propaganda will never die out. Intelligent men m... by Ethan Hollow on Thursday, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:18:01 PM
We'll have to see if the judge's ruling stands!... by wwlee4411 on Thursday, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:13:58 PM
I really cannot understand why the signing of thes... by revzef on Thursday, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:15:50 PM
It occurs to me:Let's take all of the people ever ... by Don Caldarazzo on Saturday, Sep 15, 2012 at 1:14:53 AM
On Telemundo, Obama is still mistakenly repeating ... by Gustav Wynn on Saturday, Sep 15, 2012 at 9:46:56 AM