Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Jeffery Immelt's Glossary

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 1/22/11

Become a Fan
  (40 fans)

General Electric's CEO, Jeffery Immelt, who was counter-intuitively named to head the President's Commission on Jobs and Competitiveness has written a Washington Post op-ed piece to serve as a sort of mission statement to his new sinecure.

The piece is replete with all of the Business Speak (hereinafter referred to as BS) that one might expect from such a titan of industry, although he does preface the article with an admission that all the palaver about a "service economy" was just so much BS.

He says, "But there is nothing inevitable about America's declining manufacturing competitiveness if we work together to reverse it. For example, we have returned many GE appliance manufacturing jobs to the States by collaborating with our unions and making our operations more efficient." In the Glossary of BS, "collaborating with our unions and making our operations more efficient," means whipsawing our unions against cheap foreign workers, cutting their pay and benefits to make them competitive with south and east Asian workers.

He goes on to point out that, "Currently, the United States ranks lowest among the world's largest manufacturing nations in the ratio of domestically produced goods sold overseas, or export intensity." This may be true if one attaches no value to the jobs and factories that have been Gleefully Exported by Immelt, himself.

"Free trade: America cannot expand its manufacturing base without greatly increasing the volume of goods it sells overseas. That is why I applaud the free-trade agreement recently concluded between the United States and South Korea, which will eliminate barriers to U.S. exports and support export-oriented jobs. We should seek to conclude trade and investment agreements with other fast-growing markets and modernize our systems for export finance and trade control." He adds this since twenty years of "Free Trade" agreements have had such salutary results. He then closes the paragraph with, "Those who advocate increasing domestic manufacturing jobs by erecting trade barriers have it exactly wrong," this, of course, from a corporate profits point of view.

Immelt points out that, "In the past two years, GE has created about 6,000 manufacturing jobs in the States, many resulting from investments in innovations such as advanced batteries, which we will make at our 100-year-old plant in Schenectady, N.Y.," this representing a small fraction of the jobs that Immelt alone has sent overseas.

Immelt adds hopefully, "But government can help business invest in our shared future." By this he means that it is always in order for the corporate world to help themselves to the taxpayers' money, because only corporate welfare is acceptable welfare.

In closing, he points out that, "It is possible to be a competitive global enterprise and still care about your home," in which "home" is best understood to mean the high security gated community or condominium building in town where Immelt resides. A wider definition that would include the United States has no validity in view of Immelt's business pratices.

So, here we have Immelt's playacting at loyal Americanism after so many years of repudiating that very thing. Can we really expect the skunk to change its stripes?

 

I am a lifelong resident of the Chicago suburbs, with a several year hiatus to serve in the Navy when my Vietnam era draft notice turned up. I had been told that guys with last names like mine were among the preferred cannon fodder in the Army, so (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Steal $2.5 Trillion

The "Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme" Hoax

Wisconsin's Union Workers Have Always Paid 100% of the Cost of Their Benefits

Republican Bipartisanship, a Union of Both of Their Faces

Considering Edward Snowden

The Democratization of Energy, or God Bless the Child That's Got His Own

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
putting our views forward? No one at all.Obama ha... by Virginia Simson on Saturday, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:34:41 PM