Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  3
Share on Facebook
  10
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 13 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Is Sec'y of Defense Gates Insinuating a New Arms Race and a New Cold War with China?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 1/9/11

opednews.com


Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was last seen making the talk show rounds touting the Pentagons decision to make $78 billion dollars in defense spending cuts over the next five years. With this revelation announced just a week ago it seems "eerie" that yesterday he said the Pentagon is "stepping up investments in a range of weapons, jet fighters and technology in response to the Chinese military buildup in the pacific". [1] Hmm!

This latest development (which became known to reporters who were accompanying Gates on his flight to Beijing) comes as he is about to meet with Chinese Generals and President Hu Jintao "meant to promote a more open and stable relationship between the American and Chinese militaries". [2]

The new American hardware Gates was alluding to are investments in "new long range, nuclear capable bomber aircraft"and a new generation of electronic jammers" [3] to be used by naval surface ships to defend against potential missile attacks (presumably launched by a newly aggressive China in some future conflict with them) because of his concern over Chinese "development of the anti ship cruise and ballistic missiles". [4]

Gates said, "If Chinese leaders considered the United States a declining power because of the financial crisis they were wrong" [5] adding, "For those both home and around the world who think the U.S. is in decline is that history's dustbin are filled with countries that underestimated the resilience of the United States". [6]

  Just what sort of signal was Gates sending to the Chinese just prior to three days of talks with them?

From here it seems to be an implied threat to the Chinese not to take any measures that challenge U.S. hegemony in the pacific.

Considering the colossal Chinese economic development boom over the past 20 years and becoming the world's largest manufacturer and exporter of material goods, it seems natural they would take defensive measures to protect their interests.

China has shown no imperial desires or designs beyond its borders. It is involved in trade and development all over the world including Iran, Brazil and countries in Africa primarily to enhance energy and resource development in those countries (particularly oil and natural gas) to supply growing Chinese domestic energy usage. Again China has shown no hegemony over its trading partners and particularly with the U.S. (even though China owns trillions in U. S. debt securities).

So Gates' call for a new arms build-up to counter Chinese advances to modernize their defense forces is nothing more than our conjuring up a new potential cold war foe and to justify the unnecessary, bloated spending of our military/industrial/political complex.

It's just another propaganda effort to frighten the American people unnecessarily about a non-existent threat coming from China.

It's all rather simple; if there are no real threats against us out there, imminent or otherwise, just conjure them up.        


[1] U.S. Will Counter Chinese Arms Buildup", by Elizabeth Bumiller, "The New York Times", January 9, 2011

[2]   See footnote #1

[3]   See footnote #1

[4]   See footnote #1

[5]   See footnote #1

Next Page  1  |  2

 

dglefc22733@aol.com

Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

The Danger of an Israeli Attack on Iran

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments