Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
20 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Income Distribution: Does It Really Matter

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to None 3/11/09
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)

opednews.com

The value of the Finance, Insurance and Real Estate Industry first exceeded that of the Manufacturing Industry in 1990.  It is the largest contributing segment of our Gross Domestic Product.  As our economy increasingly has become more service oriented and less dependent upon manufacturing, the value attributed to labor has decreased and that of capital has increased.  So too has the value of the minimum wage decreased; in 2007 dollars it peaked in 1968 at $9.47 per hour.  Households have had to depend upon two worker incomes, longer working hours, and increased debt just to stay even.  With polygamy continuing illegal, they have no means of assisting the economy out of the current recession. Much has been written about the increasingly concentrated wealth amongst the very-very wealthy, the top 0.1 and 1.0 percent.  But what about everybody else?  How was our 2007 national income distributed or as some would say, mal-distributed?  How has it changed in the last three decades?  Why does it even matter?

For purposes of simplicity, lets say ten dollars is distributed to ten households.  Who gets what? Well, two of the households, the top earners, will have $4.97 leaving $5.03 for the other eight households. The next two top earning households will receive $2.34, just under one-half of those "gated community" top earning households.  Between these top four earning households, they have $7.31 of each $10.00 of national income leaving $2.69 for the remaining six households. The middle two households will split $1.48 between them leaving $1.21 for the lowest four earning households.  The mean 2007 income for these two households was $50 thousand; none earned more than $62 thousand.

Of the remaining $1.21, the next lower earning two households received $0.87 and the lowest earning two households received $0.34.
    

Since 1977, the top quintile, the top 20 percent earning households have increased their share of the American income pie from 44.0 percent to 49.7 percent  The remaining eight households have all experienced a smaller share.  The 4th quintile off 1.3 percent, the middle off the most, down 2.1 percent. The 2nd quintile off 1.5 percent and the lowest quintile off 0.8 perceent.  For more than 30 years labor's share of national income has declined while that of capital has increased.

Until or unless the low-to middle-class families in this country regain the ability to, and actually do, achieve significantly increased real income, our current economic quagmire will look better than any we may find in the future.  Nothing in the current stimulus package(s) increases the value of non-executive labor upon which the vast majority depend.  Does this not portend to a long and deepening recession if not a depression?

 

A retired MBA, I am a former corporate ideologue, former 3rd party advocate and current curmudgeon. While a continued supporter of a 3rd party, I have concluded their efficacy cannot be demonstrated until our form of Government is changed to (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Follow the Yellow Brick Road - Who Rules America - Part 3

So you're proud to be an American, right? Part 2

Why Occupy? Here's why.

Follow the Yellow Brick Road - Who Rules America - Part 4

Follow the Yellow Brick Road - Who Rules America - Part 1

The Beginning of Financial Pornography: Earnings, from Insanity to Obscenity

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 20 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

tHIS MAKES ENTIRELY TOO MUCH SENSE FOR ANYONE TO T... by kay solomon on Wednesday, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:56:54 PM
A few months ago, I wrote a couple of articles wit... by PrMaine on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:20:20 AM
I keep waiting for someone in the media to get thi... by Steve Hanken on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:31:38 AM
You refer to, "the American income pie."... by roy lutz on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:49:37 AM
The other side of your argument, one that people l... by PeterJ on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:09:32 AM
Lets see if I've got this right. A person is &... by roy lutz on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:03:32 AM
only has to skim the top of the argument to justif... by PeterJ on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:28:57 PM
Roy, The wealthy are not "motivated to impro... by Harold Hellickson on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:54:51 AM
"Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. C... by Harold Hellickson on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:51:18 PM
Lincoln was right! Labor is prior to capital. And ... by roy lutz on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 3:12:53 PM
but unlikely, Harold. This will only continue unti... by PeterJ on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:01:27 PM
Peter, Kevin Philips points to three historic ins... by Harold Hellickson on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:44:06 PM
It's such a simple point a child could compreh... by PeterJ on Thursday, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:53:17 AM
Peter, I notice you guys cannot successfully confo... by William Whitten on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:43:25 AM
William. Roy's argument confounds itself ... by PeterJ on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:50:28 PM
To add to Peter's response, there are but two ... by Harold Hellickson on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:07:29 PM
Why can't you come up with a "rational&qu... by roy lutz on Wednesday, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:14:40 PM
"All great fortunes were stolen"--Dr. Fo... by William Whitten on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:13:30 AM
You may find of interest the material at aesopinst... by Mark Goldes on Friday, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:24:35 PM
I disagree with any system leaving intact personal... by William Whitten on Saturday, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:49:05 PM