Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

If It's Tuesday -- You Know ...

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 8/27/13

Become a Fan
  (47 fans)
- Advertisement -
Source: Mike Malloy

 . . . it must be Syria.


Saudi Arabia's Prince Bandar bin Sultan

Does the White House situation room have a map of the Mideast posted on a cork-board and a bunch of darts in a nearby bucket? Is that how our fearless leaders decide which oily nation to bomb/invade/plunder next?

Think they should, perhaps, clean up the other two murderous messes before sending our beleaguered troops and our bombs into another theater in the never-ending terror wars?

- Advertisement -

Naaaaaaaah ... where's the fun in that, right?

Syria is next up on the terror-wheel, and the US will justify its airstrikes because the Syrian government under President Bashar al-Assad has used chemical weapons against its own people. Sound familiar?

Secretary of State John Kerry, doing a long-faced version of Colin Powell circa 2003, presented the justification for another war without end, Amen, at the State Department:

"In some of the most aggressive language used yet by the administration, Mr. Kerry accused the Syrian government of the "indiscriminate slaughter of civilians" and of cynical efforts to cover up its responsibility for a 'cowardly crime.'

"Mr. Kerry's remarks at the State Department reinforced the administration's toughening stance on the Syria conflict, which is now well into its third year, and indicated that the White House was moving closer to a military response in consultation with America's allies.

- Advertisement -

"Administration officials said that although President Obama had not made a final decision on military action, he was likely to order a limited military operation -- cruise missiles launched from American destroyers in the Mediterranean Sea at military targets in Syria, for example -- and not a sustained air campaign intended to topple Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian president, or to fundamentally alter the nature of the conflict on the ground.

"In the coming days, officials said, the nation's intelligence agencies will disclose information to bolster their case that chemical weapons were used by Mr. Assad's forces. The information could include so-called signals intelligence -- intercepted radio or telephone calls between Syrian military commanders."

Or, the information could just come from their preferred source of disinformation, Saudi Prince Bandar, who has made a career out of using the might of the US military to topple his enemies in the Mideast, as  The Independent, UK  reports:

"He has been gone from the capital for eight years, but Prince Bandar bin Sultan, who as Saudi Arabia's ambassador to Washington wielded influence over no fewer than five different US presidents, has re-emerged as a pivotal figure in the struggle by America and its allies to tilt the battlefield balance against the regime in Syria.

"Appointed by the Saudi king, his uncle, last year as the head of the Saudi General Intelligence Agency, Prince Bandar has reportedly for months been focused exclusively on garnering international support, including arms and training, for Syrian rebel factions in pursuit of the eventual toppling of President Bashar al-Assad.

"It is a long-term Saudi goal, that in the past several days has been subsumed by the more immediate crisis over the purported use of chemical weapons by Damascus, which, according to Riyadh, must be met by a stern response. That message is being delivered to President Barack Obama by the current Saudi Ambassador in Washington, Adel al-Jubeir, who is a Bandar protege.

"As ambassador, Prince Bandar left an imprint that still has not quite faded. His voice was one of the loudest urging the United States to invade Iraq in 2003. In the 1980s, Prince Bandar became mired in the Iran-Contra scandal in Nicaragua."

Bandar was the chief apologist for the 15 Saudi hijackers who attacked this country on 9-11-2001. And he obtained safe passage for the bin Laden family to leave America after the attack. He then steered the Bush Crime Family to forget the Saudi involvement in 9-11 and instead, turn it's sights toward Iraq, even though there was no evidence Iraq had anything to do with 9-11, or posed any threat to the US (despite Colin Powell's miserable magic show at the UN Security Council). Why Bandar's bloodlust for Saddam? Because Saddam attacked Kuwait -- a key part of the Saudi oil kingdom.

Bandar's ties and sympathies to al Qaeda are well documented, and yet he is one of our most influential, trusted and revered "friends" in the region. Robert Scheer explains it all:

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.mikemalloy.com

Kathy never expected a career in radio as a talk show producer. Born and raised in Atlanta, Georgia, Kathy was completing her nursing degree when in 2001 - in an emergency - she was asked to fill in as the producer of Mike's program. Within a few (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

March of the Mysogynists

Saving Earth

The Grinch Who Stole Health Reform

Hunger in America

Mixed Nuts

Tea For Two...

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Dear Kathy, Fifteen of the patsies err...alleged "... by Bill Mack on Tuesday, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:52:03 PM
See the NO FUEL ENGINE at http://www.aesopinstitut... by Mark Goldes on Wednesday, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:39:40 PM
1976: Goldes seeks investors with fraudulent claim... by Keyto Clearskies on Wednesday, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:45:06 PM
One of the most laughable of Mark Goldes' many inv... by Keyto Clearskies on Wednesday, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:55:40 PM