Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
10 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

How to fix Scarecare

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 5   Supported 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 8/22/09

Become a Fan
  (58 fans)

opednews.com


baucus six

To proceed with Healthcare reform, which has become so fractious it could be considered Scarecare, the Democrats should proceed with Reconciliation, so they only need 51 votes in the Senate, not 60.

The notion that 60 Senate votes somehow reflects 60% of the American populace is erroneous. By and large, it is the Republican Senators from largely rural states who are opposing the Public Option, which is supported by 77% of the American people in the latest Survey USA poll. The Baucus Six -- the Senators from the six states with the most clout on the Health Care issue - come from Maine, Iowa, Montana, North Dakota, New Mexico and Wyoming. They represent less than 3% of the nation's population and hold less than 2% of the nation's uninsured. They represent virtually none of the nation's major medical research centers or renowned hospitals and an infinitesimal portion of the country's tax base that might have to pay for additional health care.

The recalcitrant Republican Senators, as a whole, probably represent (even making the very generous assumption they are reflecting the will of their own constituents), maybe 20% of the country's population. One could fit Public-Option reluctant Democratic Senator Kent Conrad's North Dakota population into downtown Manhattan. This isn't to say that rural states should not be represented in the debate, but they are clearly over-represented.

This is quite aside from the fact that the Democrats are fitness-challenged by Sen. Kennedy's and Sen. Byrd's chronic illnesses, and are being penalized by the Senate's antiquarian rules that a member must be physically present in order to vote.

The fact that reconciliation hasn't been seriously pursued indicates that the Dem's heart is not in real reform, but that they are counting on the Loyal Opposition.

The cost issue for a public option could be nearly wiped off the table by simply charging people under 65 full cost for Medicare. People already know, and like, Medicare, so this would wipe out any lingering Scarecare doubts about Death Panels and Rationed Care. It's hard to believe that the Senate has not considered extending Medicare to non-seniors, and hasn't thought about ways to pay for it, so what is really going on here?

One has to consider that it is not cost that is constraining these politicians -- after all, most of them voted for the Bush increases in Defense spending, the wars and the tax cuts that helped Bush double the national debt during his tenure. It may simply come down to ideology. They simply do not want a country in which the government provides a vital service like health care. It is too late for them to do anything about Medicare, though many Republicans have supported "privatizing" even that. But what they are truly fearful of is not that the government will get healthcare wrong, but that they might get it right, which would undermine their free-market-is-always-right argument on a host of issues. For the Republicans, it would lead to a fatal erosion of their Get-the-Government-off-my-back base. The next thing to go would be opposition to Energy and Infrastructure upgrades for a green economy, then opposition to high-speed trains and support for Mass Transit. This is a slippery slope the Republicans have no desire to fall down.

Of course, the fact that most of Europe, Japan, and Canada all have free markets and some sort of government-supported healthcare (not to mention they are ahead with bullet trains and green energy) doesn't seem to phase them -- those are Socialist countries in their minds.

In the current debate, we are paying for their ideological security with our own healthcare insecurity.

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
End the Scarecare debate

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Scott Baker is a Senior Editor/Economics Editor and Writer at Opednews, and a blogger for Huffington Post.
Scott Baker is President of Common Ground-NYC (http://commongroundnyc.org/), a Geoist/Georgist group. He has written dozens of (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama Explains the FEMA Camps

Let the Sun Shine on a State Bank in Florida

Batman, The Dark Knight Rises...and Occupy Wall Street Falls

The Least Productive People in the World

Cutting Loose: Hungary pays off IMF debt, may eye EU exit - Russia Today news

Creating a Geonomic Political Party in New York State

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Is socialism or socialist programs merely ways for... by Simple Truth on Saturday, Aug 22, 2009 at 4:14:49 PM
Seems to me that Socialism is more the WAY OF CHRI... by Bia Winter on Sunday, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:53:14 AM
But I think comparing 6 states' population to one ... by Margaret Bassett on Saturday, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:09:06 PM
They oppose the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendmen... by Jason Paz on Saturday, Aug 22, 2009 at 9:48:13 PM
The won't be so quick to repeal the 13th and 14th ... by Scott Baker on Saturday, Aug 22, 2009 at 11:37:32 PM
Israel, while THEY already HAVE Socialized medicin... by Bia Winter on Sunday, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:00:12 AM
It is so silly to see people in town hall meeting ... by Gloretha Gray on Saturday, Aug 22, 2009 at 11:44:52 PM
Um, you might want to stop calling it Medicide - a... by Scott Baker on Saturday, Aug 22, 2009 at 11:55:45 PM
The wayI look at it is that Conservatives conflate... by Johnny E on Saturday, Aug 22, 2009 at 11:52:42 PM
I have had endless arguments with people who hav... by Bia Winter on Sunday, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:11:54 AM