Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
15 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

How do you like having your intelligence insulted by Scott McClellan?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (9 fans)

opednews.com

Scott McClellan's book, Oh Migosh, I Just Figured Out That George Bush and His Henchmen and Henchwoman Were Lying About a Whole Lot of Things, makes me so goddam mad I could bite a nail in two.  Where has Scotty been all this time?  Where is any mention that we've known what he's telling us before he knew it?  Where does he get the arrogance and ignorance to presume to preach to us about what we already knew?  It's insulting to the intelligence of those who read and write for OEN.

Some will say that they're so glad that Scotty, at last, has joined with us.  But, we should save our sympathy for those who were misled and deceived by Scotty and his ilk, and properly direct our ire at those who did the misleading and deceiving, like Scotty.  Scotty had access to more information than we did, and we figured out that Bush was lying and he didn't.  It was all right there to be seen, and he didn't see it.  We did.  He has no excuse.  I can forgive the misled, but not the misleader, the deceived, but not the deceiver. 

Take a look at some of the "revelations" Scotty has for us:

Bush is guilty of a "failure to be open and forthright on Iraq and of rushing to war with inadequate planning and preparation for its aftermath."

We knew that, even as Scotty was faithfully passing on Bush lies as gospel truth about Iraq, and everything else, for that matter.

Bush "and his advisers confused the propaganda campaign with the high level of candor and honesty so fundamentally needed to build and then sustain public support during a time of war."

Bush has never confused candor and honesty with anything, he doesn't know what it is.  Scotty distributing Bush's propaganda got him the public support to get and continue his war, didn't it?

"If anything, the national press corps was probably too deferential to the White House."

If the press corps was deferential, it was to Scotty, who was deferential to Bush in passing on Bush's lies.

"The collapse of the administration's rationales for war, which became apparent months after our invasion, should never have come as such a surprise"

The collapse of the administration's rationales for war became apparent while Bush was saying them, months before the invasion, and came as no surprise to us that he was lying about the whole thing.  We knew that all along.  We knew then that there was no evidence for anything Bush was saying.  There wasn't then and never has been any evidence to support Bush's lies.

"I had allowed myself to be deceived into unknowingly passing along a falsehood.  It would ultimately prove fatal to my ability to serve the president effectively."

That's a hell of an admission, that you were fooled by George Bush.  Scotty may have been so easily deceived, but we weren't, and it seems that Scotty was very effective in serving the president by passing on what we knew were Bush's lies.  Since we knew, why didn't he?  He was right there, watching, while the lies were being invented.

Now, for Scotty's ultimate bit of all-knowing, omniscient hubris:

"History appears poised to confirm what most Americans today have decided: that the decision to invade Iraq was a serious strategic blunder.  No one, including me, can know with absolute certainty how the war will be viewed decades from now when we can more fully understand its impact."

Had Scotty just looked around, he would have seen that history (those of us who were paying attention) had already confirmed that the decision to invade Iraq, even before Iraq was invaded, was a strategic blunder.  We can see these blunders coming a mile away.  And, we knew with absolute certainty that Bush's war was a strategic blunder before he blundered.  We won't have to wait decades to know that.  We knew it then and we know it now.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Ed Martin is an ordinary person who is recovering from being badly over-educated. Born in the middle of the Great Depression, he is not affiliated with nor a member of any political, social or religious organization. He is especially interested in (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Conyers' year of tolerating contempt

You need to read this! Rob Kall's declaration of war

The worst is yet to come; foreclosure fraud is the banksters' least problem

Removal of the President from Office

Textbook descriptions of George Bush reveal psychopathy, and much worse.

Will we allow the Republicans to make the poor and the unemployed into the Jews of 1930s Germany?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 people are discussing this page, with 15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

...but it was his job. It was a position of power,... by John R Moffett on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 10:24:47 AM
I could not agree more with what you say.  We... by Nathan Nahm on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 11:38:12 AM
we may be able to identify denizens of this admini... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 4:01:21 PM
Scotty may deserve credit for telling the truth, b... by Ed Martin on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 11:29:19 AM
Ed, I think you analogy is closest to the mark.Sco... by Charlie L on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 12:45:08 PM
McClellan is saying nothing we didn't already know... by Gustav Wynn on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 1:22:19 PM
 Are we fools, certainly, but not to the ... by aberamsay on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 3:03:32 PM
Im just at a loss to try to put my finger on the p... by Antonio on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 3:12:11 PM
...belongs to the future. ... by waldopaper on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 6:53:15 PM
Sorry, but I don't know this "McLelland&q... by Ed Martin on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 8:46:41 PM
I don't know, I still believe better late than... by Archie on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 5:59:42 PM
Moralizing is absurd.  Why is anyone blaming ... by John Hanks on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 8:09:32 PM
Okay.  A certain amount of indignation toward... by Laurence A. Toenjes on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 11:48:06 PM
      DROP IT, IT WONT WO... by GUY P. FRASER on Saturday, May 31, 2008 at 10:26:06 AM
"Democratization" What a joke!!!Doesn... by lucydavis on Saturday, May 31, 2008 at 4:27:13 PM