Share on Google Plus
  1
Share on Twitter
  8
Share on Facebook
  50
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  22
81 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
21 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

How Little We Know About the Origins of 9/11

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 8   Supported 6   Well Said 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 9/8/11

opednews.com


For a decade, the main questions about 9/11 have gone unanswered while the alleged perpetrators who survived the attacks have never been publicly cross-examined as to their methods and motives. It is not conspiratorial but rather obviously plausible to suggest that they have been kept out of sight because legal due process, constitutionally guaranteed to even the most heinous of criminals, might provide information that our government would find embarrassing.

We remain in ignorance as to what drove religious zealots formerly allied with the United States to turn against us, and what was the role of our ally, Saudi Arabia, the country of origin for most of the hijackers and their financing. Why in the aftermath of the attack did the United States embrace Pakistan, which was one of only three governments (Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates were the others) to diplomatically recognize the Taliban and which turned out to be harboring the fugitive Osama bin Laden? And why did we instead invade Iraq, a nation known to be engaged in a deadly war with bin Laden and his al-Qaida?

How little we know about the origins of the Sept. 11 attacks is laid out in the disclaimer on Page 146 of the official 9/11 presidential commission report. A box on that page states clearly that the conventional narrative of how those portentous events unfolded is based largely on the interrogation under torture of key witnesses who have never been permitted a single moment in a publicly observed court of law.

As the bipartisan commissioners ruefully conceded, their examination of the motives, financing and actions of the alleged 9/11 perpetrators had to "rely heavily on information from captured al Qaeda members" that the commissioners, despite having been granted the highest security clearance, were never allowed to seriously vet:

"We submitted questions for use in the interrogations but had no control over whether, when, or how questions of particular interest would be asked. Nor were we allowed to talk to the interrogators so that we could better judge the credibility of the detainees and clarify ambiguities in the reporting. We were told that our requests might disrupt the sensitive interrogation process."

That sensitive interrogation process included the waterboarding of the key witnesses, led by alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was scheduled to go on public, civilian trial in Manhattan last spring, until the Obama administration caved in to hysterical Republican-led pressure and called off the trial.

The fear of a public trial is apparently that it will be an occasion to humanize the presumed perpetrators of barbaric acts, but by that standard no alleged murderer should ever be tried in civilian court. The counter argument is that we as a society have, from the drafting of our Constitution, been committed to due process of law. But an even more compelling objection to the present secrecy flows not from the inalienable rights of the accused to justice but rather from the need to fully inform the public as to the dangers faced by our society.

Major policy developments, including two undeclared wars, were conducted in the name of defeating the perpetrators of 9/11 without the pubic being made aware of the relevant facts. Surely a public trial would have revealed, to the deep embarrassment of the Bush administration, that there was no connection between the 9/11 hijackers and the government of Iraq that the United States overthrew.

At the very least, such testimony would have shed light on the cozy relationship between the U.S. government and the key leaders of al-Qaida, particularly the American-educated Mohammed, recruited by the CIA to join the fight against the Soviets in Afghanistan. It certainly could also have proved embarrassing to former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who, during the Bush administration, opposed public trials and managed last March to get President Barack Obama to reverse his pledge of civilian trials. Gates boasted in his 1996 memoir of his long history of working with Islamic fundamentalists in Afghanistan, dating to his days in the Carter administration. As his book publisher bragged at the time, Gates exposed "Carter's never-before revealed covert support to Afghan mujahedeen -- six months before the Soviets invaded."

Of course 9/11 changed everything; nations were invaded, trillions of dollars were wasted, hundreds of thousands of civilian and military lives were lost, torture became acceptable and the public has come to tolerate a daily governmental assault on privacy as normal. But for all of the high drama and cost of the U.S. response, when it comes to understanding the forces behind the attack, we still do not know what we are talking about.

Cross-posted at Truthdig

 

http://www.truthdig.com

Robert Scheer is editor in chief of the progressive Internet site Truthdig. He has built a reputation for strong social and political writing over his 30 years as a journalist. He conducted the famous Playboy magazine interview in which Jimmy Carter (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Christopher Hitchens: Reason in Revolt

The Peasants Need Pitchforks

Obama Pulls a Clinton

How Little We Know About the Origins of 9/11

Geithner and Goldman, Thick as Thieves

The Democrats Who Unleashed Wall Street and Got Away With It

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 people are discussing this page, with 21 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

would implode faster than its current rate, should... by Daniel Geery on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:20:07 AM
The chaos that would be produced by an implosion o... by McMicah on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:46:14 PM
How logical is it to persist in calling someone wh... by David Chandler on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:46:47 PM
"The perpetrators who need to be questioned are po... by Michael Rose on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:36:26 PM
The beginning of FBI, CIA, military industrial com... by Steven G. Erickson on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:52:26 PM
First the Colorado National Guard was called out b... by Gigi3 on Friday, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:14:10 PM
Consider what preceded the event and the results w... by Keith Pope on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:13:57 PM
... by McMicah on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:53:53 PM
Mr. Sheer, I respect you, but let's get realistic ... by Gary Brumback on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:23:09 PM
It seems to me that you ought to dig much muc... by aberamsay on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:05:27 PM
Does the "Project for a New American Century" ring... by Vaikunthanath Kaviraj on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:13:30 PM
"Religious zealots?". The patsies - who, by the wa... by Paul Carline on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:32:22 PM
Scheer has a point. "We the people of the world" k... by Daniel Noel on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:56:40 PM
"Sorry for splitting the post" 6. This frightenin... by Daniel Noel on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:57:56 PM
You have done an amazingly wonderful and honest jo... by aberamsay on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:17:52 PM
is who blocked the investigation that would have s... by Josh Mitteldorf on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:27:01 PM
I've said many times; the more important question ... by Gigi3 on Friday, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:33:45 PM
The Project for the New American Century (PNAC),... by Blaze Gold on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:47:23 PM
Everyoie who has made even a cursory investigation... by MITYOJAB on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:28:55 PM
Some of 9/11's promoters and perpetrators are now ... by McMicah on Thursday, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:57:24 PM
as far as KSM being tried in civil court..maybe he... by cathy smith on Monday, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:56:43 PM