Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
15 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

How "Liberal Media" Keep Blaming Obama for GOP's Radical Behavior

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 3/6/13
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

opednews.com


Reading what has now become  a cavalcade  of Beltway pundits, led by  New York Times  writers, denouncing President Obama for failing to avoid the drastic budget sequestration, and berating him for not "leading" by getting Republicans to abandon their chronic intransigence, I keep thinking back to the earliest days of Obama's presidency when the press concocted new rules regarding bipartisanship.

Specifically, I recall a question NBC's Chuck Todd asked at a February 2009 press briefing as the president's emergency stimulus bill was being crafted in Congress. With the country still reeling from the 2008 financial collapse, and the economy in desperate need of an immediate stimulus shot in the arm, Todd asked if Obama would consider vetoing his own party's stimulus bill if it passed Congress without Republican support.

Todd wanted to know if Obama would hold off implementing urgent stimulus spending in order to pass a different piece of legislation, one that more Republicans liked and would vote for, because that way it would be considered more bipartisan.

I mention that curious Todd query because only when you understand the warped prism through which so much of the Washington, D.C. press corps now views the issue of bipartisanship does the current blame-Obama punditr y regarding sequestration begins to make sense, even remotely.

Here's what the prism looks like, and here's what it's looked like for the last four years: Blame Obama for Republican obstinacy. (Or, as a backup: Both sides are to blame!)

And remember, most of the pundits currently taking misguided aim at Obama on sequestration are part of the supposedly "liberal media" cabal, the one that conservatives insist protect Obama at any cost.

As key observers have noted  in recent days, the facts on sequestration are not in dispute: Obama has made repeated offers to meet Republicans in the middle with a proposed deficit reduction plan built around a mix of spending cuts, reform to entitlement programs, and revenue increases. Republicans have countered by saying they will not agree to any deal that includes revenue increases. In terms of "leading," Obama has done everything in his power to try to fashion a deal with Republicans. In response, the absolutist GOP has refused to move off its starting point; it's refused to move at all. (Hint: They wanted sequestration to occur.)

So, because Obama, who just won an electoral landslide re-election, wasn't willing to concede to Republicans everything they wanted, the sequester impasse was reached and $85 billion worth of across-the-board spending cuts went into effect. From those facts, too many pundits have rushed in to blame Obama. Why him? Because he hasn't been able to change Republican behavior. He wasn't able to get them to agree to a bipartisan solution.

Question: If you're an obstructionist Republican and the press blames Obama for your actions, why would you ever change your obstructionist ways? Answer: You wouldn't. And they haven't.

Remember, the recently concluded confirmation battle over Chuck Hagel becoming Secretary of Defense wasn't just about the Republicans' unprecedented opposition to the cabinet choice. It was also about the press' ongoing refusal to acknowledge the GOP's radical obstructionism. A refusal that simply encourages more of the same destructive behavior.

Not surprisingly that theme now runs through the sequestration coverage, as pundits and commentators do their best to downplay those obstructionist tactics in order to clear a way at their real rhetorical target: Obama. (Notable exceptions are appreciated.)

My sense of deja vu on the sequester media mess is especially intense. I noticed this same trend 49 months ago:

"If Republicans simply do not want to cooperate in any meaningful way with Democrats, is there anything Obama can do to change that? No, not really. But according to the press, Obama -- and Obama alone -- is supposed to change that mindset."

For four years this nonsensical narrative about how it's up to Obama to change the GOP's conduct has been promoted and celebrated inside Beltway newsrooms. And now all the savvy pundits agree: Republicans' obstinate ways created the sequestration showdown, so that means it's Obama's fault. By failing to lead, by failing to change Republican behavior, Obama must shoulder the blame.

As noted though, the agreed-upon sequester facts are not in dispute. So in order to blame Obama for Republican obstructionism, pundits have been inserting boulder-sized caveats to their illogical writing that ultimately points the finger at the president [emphasis added]:

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Eric Boehlert is the author of Lapdogs: How the Press Rolled Over for Bush (Free Press, 2006). He worked for five years as a senior writer for Salon.com, where he wrote extensively about media and politics. Prior to that, he worked as a contributing (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Struggling Clear Channel And Rush Limbaugh's $400 Million Payday

How Fox News Is Destroying The Republican Party

Gingrich Assailed by Conservative Press; Conservatives Blame "Liberal Media"

FOX NEWS INSIDER: "Stuff Is Just Made Up"

The Truth About Glenn Beck's TV Ratings

The Self-Destruction Of Limbaugh, Murdoch and Beck

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Left and right is a bunch of bologna for simpleton... by Textynn N on Thursday, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:15:41 AM
I think we are awake to their scheme my friend-and... by Deborah Dills on Friday, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:58:55 AM
Eric doesn't seem to have quite comprehended the "... by Alan MacDonald on Friday, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:51:17 AM
as far as you go.   In fact, I entirely agr... by Nathan Nahm on Thursday, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:19:08 AM
whether the Republicans would behave the same wa... by Nathan Nahm on Thursday, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:22:19 AM
Because he is the one who resurrected the sequestr... by E. T. SIMON on Thursday, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:47:24 AM
I see it more along the lines of all Obama's gra... by Gail Harrison on Thursday, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:42:30 AM
Actions identify the true nature of a person.Presi... by SherryGT on Thursday, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:38:22 PM
I blame Obama and the Democratic Party for their f... by Deborah Dills on Friday, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:51:23 AM
Not sure which planet you're referring to, or if y... by FrankieC on Friday, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:04:42 AM
part 2News reporting today is no longer a case of ... by FrankieC on Friday, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:07:26 AM
including Obama and the Democrats are covering up ... by intotheabyss on Friday, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:18:59 AM
recognize this whole drama for what it is: a r... by frang on Saturday, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:41:44 AM
The author is right - you can't blame Obama for no... by Tracy Goode on Monday, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:06:26 PM
If you think that casting your vote for a Republic... by Tracy Goode on Monday, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:22:36 PM